For
NBC, that means no new episodes of producer Dick Wolf’s “One Chicago”
and “Law & Order” franchises. But there will be new episodes of
“Quantum Leap” and “Magnum P.I.” (which is moving over from CBS to
finish out its run) because both series completed filming before the
strikes.
ABC
is sticking with unscripted staples such as “Dancing with the Stars”
and “The Golden Bachelor” a spinoff of “The Bachelor” featuring a
71-year-old widower from Indiana. ABC will also air reruns of “Abbott
Elementary.”
On
CBS, along with expanded versions of the reality shows “The Amazing
Race” and “Survivor,” the lineup also includes reruns of “Blue Bloods,”
“NCIS” and “Yellowstone” (the latter of which originally aired on the
Paramount Network).
She has no dates and you may notice that
she is wrong about MAGNUM PI. It is not moving over from CBS. It
already moved over and its first episode broadcast on NBC was back on
February 19th. The next group of episodes will start airing October
4th. That is supposed to be the end of the series at that point (it
would be the fifth and final season). However?
The
show delivered approximately 3.5 million viewers on NBC Sunday nights
and yet the show on after it, THE BLACKLIST, lost around two million on
each episode. MAGNUM P.I. lacked a strong lead-in program and no one
was watching THE BLACKLIST anymore but MAGNUM still managed to deliver
viewers. They would be smart, NBC would be smart, to factor that in and
consider a sixth season for the show.
Tuesday, September 5, 2023. Iraq's high court nullifies the border
agreement with Kuwait, it also prevents a handover the prime minister
had announced, Australian politicians prepare to visit the United States
to call for Julian Assange's release, Ronald DeSantis continues to
struggle on the campaign trail.
Iraq's Federal Supreme Court decided Monday to invalidate a maritime
border agreement with Kuwait under which the two countries shared a key
waterway in the Gulf.
The decision against the Khor Abdullah
agreement followed a trial related to an ongoing dispute over the deal,
which was signed in 2012 and ratified in 2013 and concerned maritime
borders and navigation regulations.
The court cited its
inconsistency with the Iraqi Constitution, which mandates approval
through legislation passed with a two-thirds majority in parliament,
said a statement.
Following Iraq's invasion of Kuwait in 1990, the
UN Security Council passed Resolution 833 in 1993 which determined the
land border between Iraq and Kuwait.
However, the delineation of the maritime border was left to the two countries.
As
we've noted before -- most often with regards to Iraq and Iran --
neighboring countries and Iraq never can agree on borders. This one
had been in place for over a decade but now is being tossed aside.
Kirkuk is a multiethnic city home to Kurds, Arabs, and Turkmen, as well
as an Assyrian minority. The city was under joint administration before
2014, when Kurds took full control after Iraqi forces withdrew in the
face of a brazen offensive by the Islamic State (ISIS) group threatening
the city. Kurds held Kirkuk until October 16, 2017, when Iraqi forces
retook control and expelled Kurdish security forces following the
Kurdistan Regional Government’s (KRG) independence referendum. While
other Kurdish political parties remain active in Kirkuk, the KDP refused
to return, saying the city was “occupied” by Shiite militias.
An order from [Iraq's prime minister] Sudani in August asked the JOC to evacuate their offices
in Kirkuk and hand them over to the KDP to allow the Kurdish party to
resume its political activities in the province. The buildings were used
by the KDP prior to the expulsion of the Peshmerga forces from Kirkuk
in October 2017 when Iraq's Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) gained
control of the province.
Sudani’s decision was strongly rejected by the PMF and their supporters,
who set up tents and held sit-in protests near the JOC headquarters in
Kirkuk, blocking the main Kirkuk-Erbil highway and vowing to continue
demonstrations until the Iraqi premier revokes his decision and leaves
the matter to the judiciary. The protesters claimed that the KDP’s
return would be detrimental to the province’s security.
Footage emerged on social media depicting the PMF protesters
disrespecting the flag of the Kurdistan Region and Kirkuk’s Peshmerga
statue located near the JOC headquarters, further enraging the city’s
Kurdish population who were already frustrated with the ongoing blockage
of the key highway for nearly a week.
In the leadup to this handover, IANS notes, clashes began taking place, "The Arabs and Turkmens have been protesting over the past few days
against the return of the KDP, including blocking streets, setting
tyres on fire, and staging a sit-in outside the building to prevent the
KDP from reclaiming their headquarters."
Saturday,
the clashes turned extremely violent and at least four people (Kurds)
were killed with over a dozen more left injured. Following that, Kirkuk
was placed on curfew Saturday night. The curfew was only lifted after
the Supreme Court weighed in the following day. REUTERS reports:
Iraq's
federal supreme court issued an urgent temporary ruling on Sunday
obliging the government to delay procedures regarding the handover of a
building in Kirkuk to the KDP, the state news agency reported.
The
court ruling halted an order issued by Prime Minister Mohammed
al-Sudani in his capacity as the commander-in-chief of Iraq's armed
forces to hand over the army building to the KDP on September 1,
according to a copy of the ruling seen by Reuters.
Masoud
Barzani, a veteran Kurdish leader, accused “rioters” of blocking the
highway from Kirkuk to Erbil, the Kurdish capital, with their sit-in.
He said this was “creating a tense and dangerous situation for residents”.
Barzani
said it was “surprising” that security forces had not prevented “the
chaos and illegal behaviour of those blocking the road”, while on
Saturday, “violence was used against Kurdish youth and demonstrators”.
Kurdistan Region Prime Minister Masrour Barzani described the Iraqi
Federal Supreme Court’s Sunday decision on recovering the Kurdistan
Democratic Party’s (KDP) former headquarters in Kirkuk as a “farce”.
“Today's ‘federal court’ decision is a farce,” Barzani wrote on X platform, formerly known as Twitter.
[. . .]
Kurdistan Region Prime Minister Masrour Barzani on Sunday ordered the
Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) Ministry of Martyrs and Anfal
Affairs to register the killed protestors in Kirkuk as “martyrs” and
provide medical assistance to the wounded, the spokesperson announced.
THE NATIONAL quote Barzani point out, "It's surprising that in the past few days security forces in Kirkuk did
not prevent the violence and illegal behaviour of some groups, but
today the Kurdish protesters were faced with violence and (the) blood of
Kurdish youth was spilt, and it will carry a heavy price."
Turning
to the topic of Julian Assange, the journalist who exposed War Crimes
in Iraq and Afghanistan. Julian remains persecuted by US President Joe
Biden for the 'crime' of journalism as the world watches. Now, however,
some members of his country's government are not just speaking out from
Australia, they are planning on traveling to the United States.
A delegation of
Australian politicians from across the board will travel to the United
States in September to lobby against the extradition of Julian Assange
from a London prison.
The contingent is set to visit
Washington DC to meet with top US diplomats and urge the government to
end its prosecution bid, following years of unsuccessful intervention
attempts to free the WikiLeaks founder.
MPs spanning the political
spectrum, including Barnaby Joyce from the National Party, Tony Zappia
from Labor, Alex Antic from the Liberals, independent MP Monique Ryan
and David Shoebridge and Peter Whish-Walson from the Greens, will be
part of the lobby group.
“Australians are united in their view
that this matter must come to an end now,” Assange Campaign group’s
legal advisor Greg Barns said in a media release.
THE FAMAGUSTA GAZETTE quotes
Gabriel Shipton (Julian's brother), "The vast majority of Australians
can't understand why the U.S.
continues to act in a way that keeps Julian locked up in one of the
worst prisons in the UK. Even Australians who didn't support Julian's
actions believe he has suffered enough and should be set free
immediately." His brother also Tweeted:
If Julian's going to be set free (and he should be), it's going to require pressure from the Australian government.
Patrick Bell (Australia's ABC) explains, "The parliamentary delegation will include former Nationals leader
Barnaby Joyce, Labor MP Tony Zappia, Liberal senator Alex Antic,
independent MP Monique Ryan, and Greens senators David Shoebridge and
Peter Whish-Wilson."
AAP notes,
"The delegation will meet with members of Congress and Senate, the US
State Department and the Department of Justice. They will also meet with
think tanks and organisations including the
American Civil Liberties Union, the Foundation for Individual Rights and
Expression, the Committee to Protect Journalists and Reporters Without
Borders."
Should he be deported from the U.K., Julian Assange, the Australian publisher of WikiLeaks,
faces up to 175 years in a U.S. prison on charges related to his
release of information that revealed U.S. war crimes and torture. His
legal team has stated that they plan to appeal
the extradition case to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in
Strasbourg, France, arguing that the British litigation process has been
rife with malpractice.
However, experts say, there is little likelihood that Assange, who is
currently being detained without British charges at London’s Belmarsh
Prison pending extradition, will be allowed to physically attend any
ECHR hearings in Strasbourg, which lies in France’s Alsace region.
“The U.K. authorities’ case against bail has always been that he is
‘a significant flight risk’ and a reminder of his seven years in the
Ecuadorian embassy,” Tim Dawson of the International Federation of
Journalists, a group opposing Assange’s detention, told Truthout. “I can’t see that they are going to allow anything similar to arise.”
In other news, today on NPR's MORNING EDITION, Ashley Lopez notes
Ronald DeSantis' campaign for the Republican Party's presidential
campaign which continues to struggle for support. Or maybe it's just the
focus on smearing others. That's LGBTQ+ people, that's
African-Americans, Democrats . . . He can't even stop smearing his
fellow Republicans. Josh Christenson (NEW YORK POST) reports, "The strategist for a super PAC for Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis has
privately boasted to donors that his group is behind recent negative
press about GOP presidential hopeful Vivek Ramaswamy, a new report says." Ben Blanchet (HUFFINGTON POST) adds:
“Every misstatement, every 360 he’s conducting or 180 that he is going
through in life, is from our scrutiny and pressure. And so, he’s not
going to go through that very well, and that will get worse for him,”
said Jeff Roe of the DeSantis-supporting Never Back Down super PAC in
audio obtained by the news organization.
Meanwhile,
Ronald looked even less like a leader than usual when he refused to
stand with the president in surveying the state of Florida and its
recent damage from the hurricane.
The criticism has been building over the long weekend. Ben Blanchet notes:
In a CNN
appearance Friday, Kinzinger criticized the Florida governor, who had
expressed logistical concerns over Biden’s trip to survey hurricane
damage and remarked that the visit could be “very disruptive.”
“There’s a 1 to 2% chance it’s logistics, there’s a 98 to 99% chance it’s the optics,” Kinzinger told CNN’s John Berman.
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis has been accused of "petty politics" after he snubbed President Joe Biden when he visited the state on Saturday to survey the damage caused by Hurricane Idalia.
DeSantis
and Biden met when the president toured Florida after Hurricane Ian hit
the state last year, and in the aftermath of the Surfside condo
collapse in Miami Beach in 2021.
The pair have been speaking
regularly this week about Idalia, but DeSantis avoided being
photographed with Biden as he visited Florida on Saturday.
[. . .]
"In times of crisis, the American people expect our leaders to put
aside their differences and find strength in unity," said Nikki Fried,
chair of the Florida Democratic Party
"By refusing to meet with President Biden, he's proving again what
we've known for years—Ron will always put politics over people. I hope
his fundraisers in Iowa are worth it."
Victor Shi, a Gen-Z
activist and Biden supporter, said media reports should make clear that
it was DeSantis who refused to meet with Biden and not the other way
around.
Let's wind down with this Tweet from Paul Rudnick.
In good news for Shonda Rhimes, her new show SCANDAL:
TRUMP EDITION is a huge hit. In fact, they're at capacity with the
studio audience and may have to move to a larger venue:
Former President Donald Trump's
criminal trial in Georgia may have to move to a larger courtroom to
accommodate more attendees, the judge presiding over the case said on
Thursday.
During
a hearing addressing whether or not the trial would be televised to the
public, Judge Scott McAfee said that if the number of attendees for the
proceedings grows, a larger courtroom may be requisitioned.
The
judge also announced that all the proceedings involving Trump and his
18 co-defendants would be broadcast on the Fulton County Court YouTube
channel, following the precedent set by Fulton Judge Robert McBurney.
But
if everyone wants to see inside the courtroom, today's episode was all
about what was taking place outside. John Eastman (Clint Howard in what
should be his break out role) went on Laura Ingram's talk show
SOMETHING A-STINKIN' IN MY KITCHEN (Laura is played by David Spade and
I'm hoping he'll be Emmy nominated) and spilled the tea all over the place:
But,
in his interview defending himself in the case, the attorney actually
made a shock admission which legal experts say amounted to him
confessing to a crime.
When
host Laura Ingraham asked what his “constitutional” plan was on 6
January 2021 — as Mr Trump and his allies sought to overturn the results
of the 2020 election — Mr Eastman admitted that he tried to stop the
certification of the election results and wanted then-Vice President
Mike Pence to at least halt Congress from certifying them for a week.
“Some
people had urged that Vice President Pence simply had power to reject
electors whose certification was still pending,” he said.
“I
explicitly told Vice President Pence in the Oval Office on January 4,
that even though it was an open issue, under the circumstances we had I
thought it was the weaker argument, and it would be foolish to exercise
such power.
“What
I recommended, and I’ve said this repeatedly, is that he accede to
requests from more than 100 state legislators in the swing states, to
give them a week to try and sort out the impact of what everybody
acknowledged was illegality in the conduct of the election.”
His
response left many legal experts baffled — as it appeared that the
attorney admitted live on air that he was guilty of one of the crimes
with which he is charged.
Bradley
P. Moss, an attorney specialising in national security, posted a clip
of the interview on X/Twitter, saying: “He literally just confessed to
the crime.”
Georgia
State University law professor Anthony Michael Kreis said that Mr
Eastman was “admitting to committing federal crimes on television” in
his comments.
“John
Eastman, on trial for trying to impede the certification of
presidential electors, admits on Fox that he explicitly wanted to impede
the certification of presidential electors,” chimed in Democratic
strategist Max Burns.
Friday, September 1, 2023. Crooked Clarence makes more claims, Iraq
convicts in the killing of an American citizen (convicts but apparently
does not name), we review the clownish Cornel West, a brief moment on
water rights and more.
Harlan Crow has paid for even more travel trips for Crooked Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.
The news broke yesterday and Betty posted early with "Crooked Clarence lies again"
because the media was just repeating -- without question or comment --
Clarence's claim that his security detail told him he should try to
travel by private plane.
As Betty points out,
if that was the case -- if he's not lying again -- they didn't tell him
to let other people pay for his private plane travel.
And
I'm not sure they told him that. Clarence has a long history of lying
and I'm failing to understand why with all the FBI agents available and
with the Supreme Court of the United States Police Department if, after
DOBBS was leaked to the press, a threat assessment required more
protection, it wouldn't come from government agents? Doesn't make
sense.
I want to see that report. I want to
see a report where his security detail states he needs to travel by
private plane. And since this would be based upon a threat assessment, I
want to know why it wasn't covered by the US government.
Clarence
is lying yet again and Betty's right. This needs to be called out and
that's why we're starting with it in the snapshot.
Right-wing U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas revealed Thursday that he took three flights on the private jet of conservative billionaire Harlan Crow last year, a disclosure that came more than four months after
ProPublicareported that the powerful judge has been accepting luxury trips from the Texas real estate magnate for decades.
The trips are outlined in Thomas' required
financial disclosure
for 2022. Last May, according to the document, Thomas flew on Crow's
private jet to Dallas, where the justice delivered a keynote address at a
conference held by the right-wing American Enterprise Institute.
The disclosure states that the May flights to and from Dallas "were by
private plane for official travel" because Thomas' "security detail
recommended noncommercial travel whenever possible," citing "increased
security risk following the
Dobbs opinion leak."
That opinion, which was
formally handed down on June 24, 2022, ended the constitutional right to abortion in the U.S.
Kyle Herrig, a senior adviser to the progressive group Accountable.US,
said in a statement that "it's no surprise that Justice Thomas has kept
up his decadeslong cozy relationship with billionaire benefactor Harlan
Crow with even more lavish jet rides and vacation reimbursements."
"For years, Thomas has used his position on our nation's highest court
as a way to upgrade his own lifestyle—and that hasn't stopped," Herrig
added.
Thomas, who has
faced calls to resign
over the gifts from Crow and other billionaires, also acknowledges in
the filing that he "inadvertently omitted" bank account information in
financial disclosures dating back to 2017. Thomas previously had to
amend two decades of disclosures after he neglected to include information about his wife's income from conservative groups, including the Heritage Foundation.
"In
a pathetic attempt to clear his name, Thomas' latest financial
disclosure confirms his financial dependency on right-wing billionaires
and his scorn for basic judicial ethics and common decency," said Brett
Edkins, managing director of policy and political affairs at Stand Up
America. "It's no wonder the Supreme Court is mired in an unprecedented
crisis of legitimacy."
And a friend just called regarding DEMOCRACY NOW! yesterday. I didn't catch it but we're noting this segment.
AMYGOODMAN: This is Democracy Now!, democracynow.org. I’m Amy Goodman, with Nermeen Shaikh.
NERMEENSHAIKH: “America Is Using Up Its Groundwater Like There’s No Tomorrow.” That’s the headline to a major New York Timesinvestigation
that examines how the nation’s aquifers are becoming severely depleted
due to overuse in part from huge industrial farms and sprawling cities.
The depletion of the nation’s aquifers is already having a devastating impact. The Times
reports that in Kansas, corn yields are plummeting due to a lack of
water. In Arizona, there is not enough water to support the construction
of new homes in parts of Phoenix. And rivers across the country are
drying up.
AMYGOODMAN:
We’re going now to Oklahoma, where we’re joined by Warigia Bowman, who
has been closely tracking this issue, director of sustainable energy and
natural resources law at the University of Tulsa College of Law.
Thank you so much for being with us. Can you start off by just
explaining what an aquifer is, why these groundwater resources are under
such threat, why they’re so critical not only to the United States but
all over the world?
WARIGIABOWMAN:
Well, thank you so much, Amy. It’s really an honor to be on your show.
I’ve been listening for years, so I am grateful for the opportunity.
For your listeners, an aquifer refers to, essentially, a container of
soil and rock that holds water under the ground. This is not an
underground river. Rather, it’s water flowing through porous rock and
soil. So, if you have an aquifer very close to the surface, we usually
call that artesian, and that’s when you see a spring. So, if you see a
spring bubbling out of the ground, that means that the aquifer is very
close to the surface. Some aquifers are very deep below the surface, and
they were formed by glacial rainwater billions and millions of years
ago. So, an aquifer is just a fancy way of saying, you know, the place
that holds our groundwater.
Now, aquifers are critical for both the United and the world, because
we get so much of our drinking water from groundwater. It’s really a
significant percentage. In California, it could go as high as 60% in a
drought year.
NERMEENSHAIKH: And so, Warigia, if you could talk about how the federal government and state governments manage public water supplies?
WARIGIABOWMAN: OK. Well, the federal government does not deal with groundwater. They have the power to. The Supreme Court has said, in Nebraska v. Sporhase,
that the federal government has that opportunity. But all water law is
done at the state level for the moment. And what that means is that each
different state has a different approach to managing its water. So,
actually, who manages water at the local level, that’s a municipal
issue. That’s a little bit more of an infrastructure issue. But in terms
of who owns the water and the legal regime to utilize it, that’s a
state law issue.
AMYGOODMAN:
And can you talk about how aquifer depletion isn’t solely a problem in
the west of the country, how the tap water crisis is emerging in other
parts of the country, as well?
WARIGIABOWMAN:
OK, well, I’m not an expert on the tap water crisis, but I will say
that all coastal regions in the United States are really being
threatened by groundwater and aquifer problems. Some of the hardest hit
are going to be Louisiana and Florida. Obviously, New York will
eventually be hit.
Let’s take Florida. I’m sure you guys have already heard about how
residents in Miami are trying to move their properties or find property
on hillier areas, but in places like the Everglade, you have a very
delicate balance of freshwater and saltwater. But when we overdraw our
aquifers, then you get something called saltwater intrusion, which
upsets that balance. And that’s also a serious problem in Louisiana.
And surprisingly, under the Mississippi River between Mississippi and
Arkansas, there’s enormous aquifer depletion. It’s hard to believe
because the Mississippi is such a big river. But the farmers in that
region are withdrawing so much water so fast that actually the aquifers
underneath the Mississippi River are one of the most endangered aquifers
in the United States.
NERMEENSHAIKH:
So, Warigia, if you could talk about, very quickly, in the last minute
we have, how the climate crisis worsens this aquifer depletion and
accelerates it?
WARIGIABOWMAN:
Well, there are a few different ways. The first way is precipitation is
declining. Snowmelt is declining — I mean, snow is declining. But one
thing to understand it that aquifers and groundwater, they recharge
incredibly slowly. So, it can take millions of years to fill an aquifer,
but they can be depleted, you know, in 50 years. But as surface water
supplies, like rivers and streams and lakes, are depleted, farmers and
industry are going to draw more from groundwater, and so that
accelerates the depletion.
AMYGOODMAN:
Well, Warigia Bowman, we want to thank you so much for being with us,
associate professor and director of sustainable energy and natural
resources law at the University of Tulsa College of Law.
If you want to sign up for our daily digest, news in your email box, go to democracynow.org. I’m Amy Goodman, with Nermeen Shaikh. Thanks so much for joining us.
That's an important story, and there's so much more to it.
If you live in Goodmanville and you've got a lake and you think this doesn't effect you, you're mistaken.
I've
whined here for years about how this isn't what I want to write here.
This is what we have to and I've whined since the start that I wanted to
cover water rights. This isn't not going to be that because there's no
time. And let's keep it conversational and emphasize just one key
point.
Danny Schechter was a media analyst. He
and I kept bumping into each other in 2004 (we already knew each other)
on campuses because I was speaking out against the Iraq War and he was
promoting his documentary on the media selling the Iraq War. Since we
were often bumping into one another, we'd sometimes plan a lunch
together for a future date. I believe we were in Dallas -- I was
speaking to three campuses and he was doing a film festival there. He
brought along someone who'd done a documentary about water issues who
also brought along a college professor.
The
college professor explained that Denton, Texas had all this water around
it. But Dallas didn't have enough for the coming years. So the City
of Dallas actually had the rights -- purchased them -- to Denton's
lakes.
This isn't just an issue to the areas
that will be depleted, it's all an issue to areas that can look out the
window and think they're safe -- oh, look, the lake's got plenty of
water -- because you may not be. Your city government may have sold off
your water rights.
I've condensed that but that's the basic point. You need to know who has the rights to area's water.
The Iraqi government has
discussed establishing a nuclear reactor for peaceful purposes as the
country grapples with crippling electricity shortages.
The media office of Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani said in a statement that
the most recent meeting of the Ministerial Council for National
Security discussed “establishing a limited nuclear reactor for peaceful
purposes and the production of clean electric energy that contributes to
reducing dependence on other sources of energy such as gas and oil.”
The
Iraqi Minister of Electricity, Ziyad Ali Fadel, announced last June
that Iraq produces 24 thousand megawatts per day, an increase of 22
percent over last year. However, providing electricity 24 hours a day
requires production of 34 thousand megawatts per day.
Oh, look, 20 years after Bully Boy Bush was lying about "yellow cake uranium," Iraq may finally get some.
So
US troops remain on the ground in Iraq supposedly to train and help
with terrorism -- rooting it out -- and yet Iraq's the place for a
nuclear reactor. Hmm.
In other news, the US State Dept issued the following yesterday:
Press Statement
Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson
August 31, 2023
We welcome the Iraqi court’s decision to convict and sentence
multiple individuals on terrorism charges for their roles in the killing
of U.S. citizen Stephen Troell. It is critical that all those
responsible for the brutal, premeditated assassination of Mr. Troell
face justice and accountability. We once again extend our condolences to
Mr. Troell’s family and hope this verdict brings them some measure of
justice.
The officials did not identify the Iranian and provided no further details about the case.
The Interior Ministry also confirmed the sentences in a statement, saying four other accused are still wanted.
"The Iranian man was the mastermind of the crime," one legal source told Reuters. All five were arrested in Iraq soon after the fatal shooting, the source said.
At
the time of the killing, Mr Troell was working in the local English
school, the Global English Institute, run by the Texas aid group
Millennium Relief and Development Services.
A
native of Tennessee, he had lived in the Iraqi capital with his wife
Jocelyn – who was the language school's manager – three daughters and a
toddler son, since 2018.
Shortly
after the killing, social media accounts close to Iran-backed Shiite
militias accused him of being a spy, although they produced no evidence
for the claim.
"Let's just go with Tina Louise." Yesterday's snapshot
was an apparently an eye opener for some. Again, let me repeat myself,
African-Americans are not going to line up behind Cornel West because
Cornel's Black. That belief is latent racism on the part of White
people. They are not lining up behind Tim Scott.
B-b-but Cornel's a hero.
Conrel's a hero to White blabber mouths.
You are ignorant of reality if you don't grasp that.
Cornel
is seen as an enemy by some as a result of 2008. It's not in his
WIKIPEDIA, big surprise. But Cornel went around 'pressuring' or
'attacking' Barack Obama in the 2008 primaries and election.
You have no idea, if you live in a White-focused world, how scarring that was.
Tavis Smiley partnered with Cornel for that 2008 action.
I
know Tom Joyner, love him, known him for decades. In 2008, Tavis had
to leave THE TOM JOYNER MORNING SHOW and Tavis and Tom were very close
and neither wanted it to happen. But despite being a beloved part of
the show, by staff and by the audience, it did happen. What Cornel and
Tavis were doing was leading to a huge ton of complaints from listener
and there was also some drop off in the ratings with more of a drop off
expected. So Tavis left the show.
NOTE:
I am not in the mood for stupid. I've told Martha and Shirley to
delete any e-mails coming into the public account that want to pretend
they know facts when they don't. Do not e-mail, "You are confusing 2012
with 2008." No, CRAPAPEDIA is wrong as usual. It's a White site, don't
trust it for information about any non-White person. 2008 is the
issue. I'll spoonfeed lazy asses once and only once on this: here's a link to ESSENCE and
it's from 2008 and that's when Tavis left. And Tom's quoted in there
and Tom told the truth. I have no idea why Cornel's lying in the
interview but Cornel's always lying.
This
is the sort of thing in the Black community that White YOUTUBE can't,
won't and doesn't tell you. Sometimes it's because they're young adults
too stupid to learn history before opening their mouths to offer
'facts.' Sometimes it's because they just don't care. It's not White
so it doesn't matter to them and, who cares, they're just going to say
whatever they want about Black people because isn't that the White way.
I'm sick of it, I'm sick of these people thinking they can weigh in when they don't know what the hell they're talking about.
After
Barack was elected in November 2008, Cornel could never figure out
where he stood on Barack which resulted in gushing and in attacks and it
never made sense and Tom Joyner's audience was vocal about that.
After the election, with Barack in the White House, some of the tensions
could have healed for Cornel. And he could have, for example, remained
a critic of Barack and that would have been okay. People would have
said he was being consistent. Instead, he was all over the map --
slamming one moment, fluffing the next. Over and over.
Cornel's
audience is and always has been people who could be male characters on
THE BIG BANG THEORY. A bunch of White men and Raj.
He talks a lot -- in circles -- he never does anything. He's a blabber mouth.
He's
not Rev Jesse Jackson who's got a lifetime of activism -- real activism
-- and then decides to run for president in 1984. He's a DSA academic
removed from reality. And since YOUTUBE is the same -- and is pretty
much hosted by people who could be male characters on THE BIG BANG
THEORY -- no one wants to comment on that reality.
He's not a doer, he's a talker.
He's
not an activist, he's an academic. And not a good academic because a
good academic can, for example, criticize Lawrence Summers without
sounding anti-Semitic. Cornel knows all about coded language and used
it repeatedly in his war with Lawrence Summers (and that goes far beyond
with the ridiculous comparison of Summers to Ariel Sharon). We have
criticized Lawrence repeatedly and harshly over the years and we never
had the need to do it with references -- coded or otherwise -- to
Lawrence being Jewish.
Your nerd fan boi fantasies about Cornel West are not reality.
Jesse
and Jackie Jackson are fixtures in the African-American community and
that's due to the fact that they have roots in and they are part of it.
They have given decades working in the community.
Cornel and all three of his wives can't make that claim.
I'd
say he was busy working in the academic community but that's a lie as
well and that was at the heart of his dispute with Lawrence when
Lawrence took over at Harvard -- Cornel was too busy trying to become an
academic celebrity, churning out co-written 'books' that were sloppy
and not scholarly.
Cornel was not leading
protests, he was not organizing within the community, he was shucking
and jiving and making funny faces in interviews to increase his own fame
and wealth.
He is weak ass and he's seen as a clown.
But you keep imposing how you see him onto others and pretend like that's reality. See where it gets you.
This
push to make Cornel West the Green Party presidential nominee (they
will choose their nominee at their party convention in the summer of
2024) makes about as much sense as White House chief of staff Jeff
Zients telling Joe Biden that the next cabinet secretary opening should
go to Tina Louise "because she was so good on GILLIGAN'S ISLAND as
Ginger."
And let's talk the real
harm if Cornel is the nominee. He's not a Green (he's DSA) and you're
yet again telling your own party that there is no one in the party
worthy of the nomination so you're going to draft from outside the party
again.
Canada warned travelers visiting the United States about state laws impacting LGBTQ people.
The country added a cautionary message for travelers who identify as Two-Spirit,
lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex or those who use
other terminologies to its travel advice and advisory page for the U.S.
on Tuesday.
“Some
states have enacted laws and policies that may affect 2SLGBTQI+
persons,” the advisory said. The warning recommended travelers check
relevant state and local laws.
“The Government of Canada
takes the safety and security of Canadians abroad very seriously and
provides accurate and up to date information in its Travel Advice and
Advisories to enable travelers to make informed and responsible
decisions regarding their destinations,” a spokesperson for Global
Affairs Canada told USA TODAY in an emailed statement.
From the government of Canada's Global Affairs website:
2SLGBTQI+ travellers
Some states have enacted laws and policies that may affect 2SLGBTQI+ persons. Check relevant state and local laws.
Travel and your sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression and sex characteristics
Foreign
laws and customs related to sexual orientation, gender identity, gender
expression and sex characteristics (SOGIESC) can be very different from
those in Canada. As a result, you could face certain barriers and risks
when you travel outside Canada. Research and prepare for your trip in
advance to help your travels go smoothly.
The
updated advice does not mention any specific law or state policy, nor
does it suggest staying away from a particular state. When asked
for details, a department spokesperson pointed to laws targeting the
transgender community.
"Since
the beginning of 2023, certain states in the U.S. have passed laws
banning drag shows and restricting the transgender community from access
to gender affirming care and from participation in sporting events,"
the spokesperson said in a media statement.
"The
information is provided to enable travellers to make their own informed
decisions regarding destinations. Outside Canada, laws and customs
related to sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression and
sex characteristics can be very different from those in Canada."
I don't know what to say except, "Today, we're all the children of Florida."
Like
those poor unfortunates in Florida, we are the laughingstock. We are
looked down on by educated areas of the world, just like the children in
Florida who can't learn this or study that or read that. Government
officials have betrayed us and made us seem like idiots. Hopefully, as
we should grasp that the children in Florida are not responsible for
Ronald DeSantis' war on education, the people of the world can grasp
that we are not all as stupid and hateful as some of our leaders.
The
Florida section above was dictated but accidentally got left out when
the snapshot went up. It was put in on 9/1/23 at 11:27 am PST.
Let's wind down with this from Will Lehman:
Dear fellow workers,
As
the clock ticks down to the September contract expirations for 170,000
US and Canadian autoworkers, plans for a jobs massacre of historic
proportions are being concealed from the rank and file.
The transition to electric vehicles must not be carried out at workers’ expense!
Join an online meeting this Sunday at 3 p.m. Eastern/2 p.m. Central time for an urgent discussion of
this threat. The meeting will review critical information on the scale
of the coming attacks on jobs and the strategy for workers to unite
internationally to fight the jobs massacre and reverse concessions.
Register for the event here.
I encourage all autoworkers and other UAW members to attend:
What
is being prepared is not a contract, it is a death warrant for hundreds
of thousands of auto jobs in North America and millions around the
world. To oppose this, workers must have all the facts so they can
develop a strategy to defend jobs and living standards.
This once-in-a-century industry transition threatens to eliminate half or more than half of all auto jobs in the US in the next five to 10 years, according to industry reports and research by experts.
In
the US, plans for a brutal restructuring of the auto industry are being
worked out behind workers’ backs by the United Auto Workers union
bureaucracy, which is conspiring with management and the Biden
administration. In Canada, the Unifor bureaucracy and the Trudeau
government are playing similar roles.
The
primary concern of UAW President Shawn Fain and the UAW apparatus is
not a “just transition” to EVs—which is impossible under capitalism—but
rather to maintain and expand its access to dues money from workers at
the new EV battery plants.
US
imperialism and its allies, meanwhile, see the transition to EVs as a
vital necessity, as they seek to undermine their economic
competitors—particularly China—and increase the massive profits pumped
out of the working class.
The
defense of workers’ jobs and the progressive resolution of any of the
life-and-death problems confronting workers requires an international
strategy, uniting autoworkers around the world, who confront the same
enemies in the world’s transnational auto companies.
To
stop the plans for a jobs massacre, the IWA-RFC and the Autoworkers
Rank-and-File Committee Network are calling for workers to form
rank-and-file factory committees and fight for the following demands:
Immediate release of the list of planned plant closures!
Not a single job loss or plant closure in the transition to EV!
If EVs require less labor time to produce, then reduce hours and increase pay!
Unite across borders to prevent a race to the bottom!
Place the auto industry under social ownership subject to democratic worker control!