Wednesday, June 17, 2026

Chump refuses to put up or shut up

 From last night, this is Isaiah's THE WORLD TODAY JUST NUTS "Bet He Had To Sit By Himself At Lunch As Well"

chumpstandsbyhimself



We still have not seen the 'deal,' 'cease-fire,' or 'memo of understanding.'  Whatever you call it, Convicted Felon Donald Chump continues to keep it under wraps.  Ray Richmond (RAW STORY) notes:

It's pretty clear to anyone with functional synapses that Trump had to sell his soul — I mean, that is, if he had one — to get the Strait of Hormuz open again so oil could once again flow through and gas prices could drop and every Republican in Congress might stand a slight chance of not getting wiped out in the midterms.
Again, they’re not releasing any details of the MOU until Friday or disclosing why it’s taking several more days to put it out there. Not that anything we’ll be fed is anything close to the truth, a concept with which these people haven’t the thinnest association. The more secretive they are, however, the worse the reality tends to be.

Let’s remember that Barack Obama had carved out a much more equitable deal when he was president. The strait was also wide open for years and years until Trump got the bright idea to invade Iran, only to quickly lose interest and struggle to brainstorm a way out. It turns out he found one, but it cost him — and us — dearly.

And then, of course, Trump began crowing that he was alone among American presidents in figuring out a way to make peace with Iran, conveniently forgetting that it was him who had launched the hostilities in the first place. The man remains the King of Shamelessness.
As part of his talk show propaganda tour, Vance is claiming that it’s actually Qatar and Saudi Arabia that will be paying the $300 billion in “reparations” that Iran is demanding. But that is plainly untrue. The fact is, it’s going to cost America and only America (i.e. you and me), and that doesn’t count the $70 billion the war has already cost us — to say nothing of the lives of the 13 American service members killed in action that we know of, or the thousands of Iranian civilians.

Oh, and there is also this: the MOU that Iran has released and is likely more trustworthy and forthcoming than the one our own Department of Defense will be putting out says not a thing about Iran giving up its nuclear material or ballistic missiles and drones. There is also nothing that specifically says, “Iran will give up its nuclear program and forego creating a nuclear weapon.”

Some comments on the article:

Aristotle's Cat
2 hours ago
Soldiers' lives, civilian lives, billions in direct costs of war, close to a trillion in economic costs, 300 Billion to buy peace, and the alienation of US allies, and an Irani regime more radical than last one-- all outcomes of letting a psychopathic child run this nation. Care to list the benefits?

Bob Sacamano
1 hour ago
The real question is does the Trump cult realize their mistake yet? Have they learned anything? Hard to be anything but doubtful considering their history.

Richard Droney
4 hours ago
This war of choice is a defeat for him and us. We are diminished. They are so ashamed of what is in the MOU they are desperately stalling the release and scrutiny by the press and congress.
The repubs are in a box. Thune and Johnson oppose this MOU and what? The war is restarted and gas prices skyrocket? They approve the MOU with a little huffing and puffing and they join Trump in a partnership of defeat.
Another stone for the repubs to carry to November. Are repubs/Trumpers happy now?



People are calling the deal out.  Alex Welch (THE WRAP) notes:

"Morning Joe" host Joe Scarborough took great issue Tuesday with President Trump's continued, ambiguous comments about the peace deal between the U.S. and Iran that is expected to be signed Friday, with the MS NOW anchor going so far as to demand that the president "show the world" the cease-fire's terms.
"If you have a peace deal that is so great, that's going to bring peace to the world, that's going to bring peace to Iran, then show it. Show it to the world!" Scarborough said. "We still are hearing very little about it. Even [South Carolina Sen.] Lindsey Graham said, 'It's hard to support a deal when the only thing you hear about the deal comes from Iran.'"

It was not, however, the ambiguity surrounding the deal's actual terms that Scarborough found most concerning but rather Trump and Vice President JD Vance's latest, appeasing comments about Iranian leadership.

"Donald Trump just called the most extreme members of the Revolutionary Guard 'rational,'" Scarborough observed. "This is exactly what his critics in America were concerned about. This is exactly what Republicans were concerned about. This is exactly what Iran hawks were concerned about. That he would be so desperate that he would bend over backwards to sell a really bad deal."


I think we are all tired of the endless yammering from Mr. Chump.  It is put up or shut up time.  I am not sure he grasps that.  He appears to think he can just pretend and trick us all.  His tricks are tired and he has lost the ability to pull his con jobs on us.  It is the end for him.

This is C.I.'s "The Snapshot" for today:

Wednesday, June 17, 2026.  Chump fizzles at the G7, he still won't release the memo passed off as a deal, Markwayne Mullin 'forgot' about disclosure, JD Vance has a book to pimp, staffers with the House Oversight Committee went to Bryan, Texas to check up on Maxwell, and much more.



The G7 took place.  Chump attended.  Ben (MEIDASTOUCH NEWS) reports how sad and humiliating it was for Chump. 



 Isaiah's THE WORLD TODAY JUST NUTS "Bet He Had To Sit By Himself At Lunch As Well" went up last night and noted Chump at the G7 -- alone. 



Rob Gillies (AP) notes, "Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney will leave the G7 summit on Wednesday without a formal meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump as the free trade agreement between their countries faces an uncertain future.  Canadian leaders typically get a bilateral meeting with American presidents at summits of the world’s leading industrialized democracies, but Carney dismissed any notion of a snub."  Tom Nichols (THE ATLANTIC) adds:

Donald Trump arrived in France yesterday for this morning’s G7 summit and promptly confirmed America’s capitulation to Iran. Instead of merely repeating the outlines of what looks to be a terrible peace deal, however, Trump made a series of statements so bizarre, even by his usual standards, that they raise the question of whether the president still understands the words that come out of his own mouth.

The president began with a classic Trumpian move, daring his listeners to forget today what they knew yesterday. Just this winter, Trump had promised the Iranian people that the tyrants who ruled them would be gone. But now? “I never cared about regime change,” he told reporters, waving away his failure to achieve a primary strategic goal by denying that it had ever been a goal at all.





One of the largest fertilizer companies in the world, the Mosaic Company, is losing money because a small amount of a specific ingredient is stuck in the Strait of Hormuz.

Mosaic makes phosphorus fertilizer, which contains sulfur and ammonia. The war in Iran has disrupted the world’s supply of sulfur, a fifth of which travels through the strait. The price Mosaic receives for one ton of fertilizer is about $800, and half that cost — before processing, shipping and labor — now goes just to acquiring sulfur.

“If we’re losing money every ton, the total losses can mount quickly,” Ben Pratt, Mosaic’s vice president of public affairs, said in an interview. Mosaic lost $258 million in its quarter ending March 30, and said it would slow production at some of its plants. Even as the United States and Iran reached a preliminary agreement on Sunday to end the war that has roiled the region since March, it would take months for ship traffic and supply chains to return to normal, and years for destroyed energy and fertilizer infrastructure to be rebuilt.

A full reopening of the strait will eventually cause fertilizer prices to fall, but they will remain above their prewar levels for years to come, said Shawn Arita, an agricultural economist at North Dakota State University.

“The spike resolves with the Strait; the premium resolves with reconstruction, and that looks more like a 2028 story than a 2027 one,” he wrote in an email.

Chump may have ended the Iran War he started, he may not have.  We won't know until Friday at the earliest.  




But we do know fertilizer will remain high this year and next.  And we can all thank him for that. 


The war has set in motion changes that will be hard to reverse.
The near shutdown in oil and gas deliveries from the Middle East and the leap in prices are causing a shift in power. Energy producers from the Gulf to the Americas are jockeying to maintain or increase their dominance, and customers are struggling to reduce their dependency and shore up their supply.
As a result, the energy market is changing, the energy mix is changing and the energy players are changing.
[. . .]
Inflation is also starting to roar. In the United States, it rose for the third month in row, hitting an annual rate of 4.2 percent in May. And instead of planning for the next drop in interest rates, Wall Street is expecting the Federal Reserve to increase rates at least once this year. Last week, the European Central Bank raised rates to 2.25 percent. “The war in the Middle East is generating inflation pressures,” the bank said.


The paper's Emmett Lindner tackles the issue of gas prices:

Drivers hopeful that the U.S.-Iran framework deal will translate to lower gasoline prices will probably have to wait weeks, or longer, to see meaningful improvement.

Energy analysts refer to the swing of prices as “up like a rocket, down like a feather” — a phenomenon that means gasoline costs quickly rise alongside the price of crude oil but are slow to follow its descent.

One of the main reasons is that gas station owners tend to lose money or make only small profits when prices are shooting up because they are not able to raise prices fast enough to make up for soaring costs. So when wholesale prices start to go down, station owners are slow to bring retail prices down to make up for their poor financial performance on the way up.

The average price of regular gasoline in the United States went up roughly 50 percent between Feb. 28, when the United States and Israel attacked Iran, and the middle of May. It has receded since then and was $4.04 a gallon on Tuesday, according to the AAA motor club.


All of the above goes a long way towards detailing the current march away from the GOP.  Martha McHardy (DAILY BEAST) explains:


Americans are fed up with the Republican Party, according to a new poll.

Polls have already shown the Republicans trailing the Democrats ahead of the midterm elections amid Trump’s record low approval ratings and concerns about the economy and the war in Iran.

But a new CNN/SSRS poll, conducted between May 7 and 31 among 2,480 adults, shows Republicans are facing growing political headwinds ahead of the November elections, with fewer voters identifying as Republicans.
The survey found that among registered voters, Democrats now hold a slight advantage over Republicans, with 31 percent identifying as Democrats compared to 28 percent who identify as Republicans. Another 41 percent say they do not identify with either major party.

That marks a notable reversal from 2024, when Republicans held a three-point advantage in party identification among registered voters. At that time, 34 percent identified as Republicans, 31 percent as Democrats, and 35 percent said they belonged to neither party.



Young children often struggle to admit blame.  Demented old man can suffer from the same avoidance. With young children, their emotional regulating is still developing and a mistake can cause them to question their self-worth and activate feelings of shame.   Apparently, elderly men suffering from dementia, like Donald Chump, go through something similar.  Owen Scott (INDEPENDENT) reports:

The Trump administration has hit out at former President Obama after the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool water turned green, despite a much-touted $14 million renovation.

Work on the pool was completed last week, after President Donald Trump vowed to paint the space an “American flag blue.”​ However, the familiar green algae often spotted in the pool returned just days later.


The Washington Post revealed on Tuesday the latest cost estimates for President Donald Trump’s highly controversial ballroom, which he promised the American people would be funded entirely by private donors.

The Post obtained a “detailed project summary prepared for the White House by the contractor” that instead showed the cost would come in at $600 million, with over half the cost being burdened by the public. Even more remarkable, the Post notes, Trump received the estimate three weeks before publicly saying the project would cost $400 million and include no public funding.
“This is taxpayer-free. We have no taxpayer putting up 10 cents,” Trump declared in the Oval Office on March 31, well after receiving the estimate.

“President Trump and generous American patriots are funding the ballroom to the tune of approximately $400 million, which will be a secure and appropriate venue for Presidents for generations to come,” White House spokesman Davis Ingle wrote in a statement to the Post.

The Post also reached out to the contractor that prepared the estimate, McLean, Virginia-based Clark Construction, which said through a spokesperson that “all project details are confidential and referred questions to the White House.”



On the topic of childish Chump and actual children, he continues his war on education.  Annie Ma (AP) reports, "President Donald Trump’s administration is further dismantling the Department of Education, moving oversight of special education and civil rights to other agencies. The Department of Justice will take on enforcement of civil rights in education, while the Department of Health and Human Services will oversee special education. The Trump administration made the announcement on Tuesday."  Bianca Quilantan, Mackenzie Wilkes and Rebecca Carballo (POLITICO) add:

The shift of special education in particular is likely to garner some pushback on Capitol Hill, including among Republican lawmakers who want to ensure that the federal government is meeting its legal obligations to students with disabilities.

Advocates for children with disabilities have warned that moving special education out of the Education Department could derail progress made in educating students with disabilities and splitting its responsibilities between multiple agencies could dampen coordination among offices responsible for enforcing civil rights laws and carrying out K-12 programs. The special education office is also responsible for ensuring states are in compliance with the federal disability education law.

As of last June, over 30 states and territories need assistance with meeting IDEA requirements for students with disabilities ages 3-21. And roughly 20 states and territories need assistance meeting federal mandates for early intervention services for infants and toddlers, according to an analysis of Education Department information. A handful of states “need intervention” which could mean a state has to create an improvement plan or strike a compliance deal with the federal government.

Zachary Schermele (USA TODAY) points out, "The announcement is also the latest attempt by the Trump administration to use so-called "interagency agreements" to, effectively, kill the Education Department without congressional action. Over the past year, the Education Department has initiated more than a half dozen partnerships with other federal agencies, including the Labor and Interior Departments, to outsource much of its work."  He's dismantling the entire cabinet.  Arthur Jones II (ABC NEWS) notes, "President Donald Trump campaigned in 2024 on closing the agency."




Turning to Homeland Security, Markwayne Mullin is the Secretary of the department and  Kenneth P. Vogel and Christina Jewett (NEW YORK TIMES) report a 'woopsie!' on his part:

For years, federal health officials have warned about the risks associated with a supplement derived from the leaves of kratom trees that adherents say can kill pain or boost energy. Sold in gas stations across America, kratom has been linked to liver toxicity, seizures and thousands of deaths.

Powerful figures close to President Trump, including Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin, pushed to downplay those concerns.

Mr. Mullin, until recently a Republican senator from Oklahoma, played a key role in a sprawling influence campaign spearheaded by the kratom industry that courted Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Vice President JD Vance, among others in the Trump administration, an investigation by The New York Times found.

Only when he was nominated by Mr. Trump in March to lead the Homeland Security Department did it become clear that Mr. Mullin had a financial connection to the supplement. In a disclosure statement, he listed an investment worth as much as $1 million in a kratom company, Botanic Tonics, that could benefit from the changes he has sought.
[. . .]
In July, while still a senator, Mr. Mullin showed up at a Food and Drug Administration news conference and endorsed proposed federal restrictions on more powerful synthetic supplements that compete with kratom for shelf space. In explaining his position, Mr. Mullin pointed to a history of addiction in his family, though health experts say kratom products have also been shown to be addictive.

His disclosure form did not indicate when he acquired his stake in Botanic Tonics, but he has not filed paperwork to indicate that he has divested from it.

The Homeland Security Department did not answer questions about the investment. In a statement, the department said that Mr. Mullin “follows all ethics and conflict of interest standards and has not lobbied for any individual or company.”


It's been months since the Department of Homeland Security issued a press release accusing a Rhode Island federal judge of knowingly ordering the release of an international homicide suspect in a habeas corpus case. The falsehood is still online in its original form to this day, "despite the government's knowledge that it is false," and the suspect remains at large, according to the court. And now, a DOJ lawyer has been called on the carpet for making the equivalent of an "affirmative false statement" to protect his client.
On Tuesday, the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island provided Law&Crime with a statement and the outcome of an investigation into Assistant U.S. Attorney Kevin Bolan. Law&Crime previously reported that U.S. District Judge Melissa DuBose, in late April, granted the release of Bryan Rafael Gomez. In response, DHS posted a press release calling the ruling "yet another example of an activist judge trying to thwart President Trump's mandate from the American people to remove criminal illegal aliens from our communities."

The problem then and the problem now is that the government claimed DuBose knew Gomez had a homicide warrant out for his arrest in the Dominican Republic, but that the Joe Biden-appointed judge ordered his release anyway to endanger the American public. Once the judge forced Bolan to testify in court, however, it became clear that DuBose had no such knowledge about the warrant.
Bolan said that he "sincerely" apologized for the "consequences" of his "lack of disclosure," claiming he was following ICE's guidance that he was not allowed to "disclose that information," not knowing that ICE "had previously disclosed that same information on April 16, 2026," and publicly, though not directly to DuBose. In case that representation wasn't clear enough, acting Attorney General Todd Blanche's name appeared on a filing that clarified DuBose "did not have knowledge at the time of her ruling that Gomez was wanted by authorities in the Dominican Republic."

When DuBose questioned Bolan during a show-cause hearing, he said he reached out to anyone capable of getting the DHS post taken down, but those efforts were in vain. The judge heard the apology and explanation but nonetheless referred the matter for potential disciplinary action, considering the government's withholding of "highly relevant information and their lack of candor to this Court[.]"
Chief U.S. District Judge John McConnell quickly agreed that a special counsel probe of "possible misconduct" was warranted.



The top federal judge in Rhode Island is slamming the Trump administration for unfairly issuing a “public attack” on one of his colleagues that “put her in personal danger and undermined public faith in the federal courts.”

The statement Tuesday comes after a special counsel he appointed to investigate alleged misconduct by a Justice Department attorney concluded that the lawyer had made a serious ethical violation, but that he should not face formal disciplinary proceedings.
Chief Judge John McConnell said that that a special counsel “found sufficient evidence to conclude” that Kevin Bolan, a top lawyer in the Rhode Island US attorney’s office, hadn’t followed his obligation to be honest and transparent in court when he deliberately withheld information about a years-old homicide arrest warrant for a migrant. District Judge Melissa DuBose later ordered officials to release the migrant from ICE custody.
[. . .]
The situation in Rhode Island is among a series of professional mishaps by Justice Department lawyers over the past 16 months that have frustrated federal judges sifting through thousands of cases stemming from President Donald Trump’s aggressive deportation push and other controversial moves that have been challenged in court.
Earlier this month, a different judge in the Ocean State referred several other government attorneys for disciplinary proceedings after their conduct in a case over the administration’s probe into the provision of gender-affirming care for minors raised questions about whether they were acting improperly in court.



Miss Sassy JD Vance has a book to sell and with his personality?  It's a stretch.  But he's going around to anyone who will have him.  Monday it was FOX AND FRIENDS.  Kathleen O'Boyle (THE MIRROR) notes the reaction to that appearance:

But while the vice president spoke about the alleged threat, social media was zoned in on what some viewers believed was his eyeliner.

One person wrote, “JD Vance [went] heavy on the eyeliner this morning.” “Guess the Senate’s new makeup includes a touch of glam, because even politicians need a good winged liner for those filibuster selfies,” someone else responded.
A third person joked, “JD: I’m sorry, but My Chemical Romance is not going to hire you as their rhythm guitarist.” “Maybe she’s born with it. Maybe it’s Maybelline,” one person quipped.

Another added, “The more stress he’s under the more eyeliner JD applies,” and one more saying, ““This is very, very dark stuff.” Clearly referring to his guyliner.”
“What’s up with JD Vance using heavy eyeliner this morning on Fox and Friends?” a final person asked.

This is not the first time Vance’s appearance has sparked conversation online. He has long faced speculation about whether he wears eye makeup or has enhanced lashes. During the 2024 election debates, viewers, both familiar and unfamiliar with Vance, questioned his appearance, with some suggesting he appeared to be wearing makeup around his eyes.


Yesterday, he stopped by THE VIEW.





Sunny Hostin then brought up the Epstein files, asking why the administration has yet to release the entirety of the documents.

“I wanted to have full transparency. What I disagree with is the idea the White House wasn’t committed to full transparency,” Vance said. He added, “I have to defend my boss,” noting that “Epstein hated Donald Trump” because “Trump literally reported Jeffrey Epstein to the police.” (According to a recently released FBI interview summary, Trump reportedly told police officers in Florida “thank goodness you’re stopping him” in relation to Epstein in 2006.)

Behar pushed back on Vance, saying of Trump and Epstein, “They were best friends for a decade.” And Navarro argued that Trump and Epstein’s fallout had nothing to do with the latter’s sex crimes but rather a “real estate deal they got into a fight over.” “Let’s be truthful and transparent. They didn’t just know each other. They were close friends,” she said.

CNN's Brian Stelter notes the Epstein moments as follows:

On the topic of Epstein, he confirmed reporting in Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan’s forthcoming book “Regime Change” that says White House chief of staff Susie Wiles privately described Vance as a conspiracy theorist.

“I love Susie, but absolutely, she thinks I’m a conspiracy theorist on the Epstein stuff,” he said, “because I think that it’s crazy that you had this guy who is clearly a sex predator who was hanging out with a lot of very wealthy and powerful people. Like, that really bothered me. I don’t know what’s there, of course, nobody knows exactly what happened unless you were there, but that really bothered me, and I wanted to have full transparency.”

Vance repeatedly pushed back when the co-hosts pointed out Trump’s past ties to Epstein. He falsely suggested that the friendship was “back in the 1980s,” when in fact the close relationship was documented throughout the 1990s.

According to an FBI document, Trump called the Palm Beach Police Department when the police opened an investigation into Epstein in the mid-2000s and said, “Thank goodness you’re stopping him. Everyone has known he’s been doing this.”

Vance depicted the call this way: Trump “narced on him to the police and led ultimately to Jeffrey Epstein’s downfall.” But an investigation was already underway at the time.



Vance told the show that “I have to defend my boss,” and in doing so, he cited how Trump kicked Epstein out of his Mar-a-Lago resort and reported Epstein to police, according to the files.

He also signed the Epstein Transparency Act, Vance said, only to be told by Ana Navarro that this was done “under duress” after a MAGA backlash and dissent within his own ranks.

Vance rejected this. “I was there, he called the senators and said, you know what, pass this bill, I’ll sign it,” he insisted.

“Why haven’t we seen the release of over 2.5 million additional Epstein final documents?” asked Sunny Hosten.

“I’m going to check on this to make sure, but my understanding is that a lot of those are duplicates of things that have already been released,” Vance replied.

“We’re not holding anything back.”

What I disagree with is the idea that the White House wasn't committed to full transparency. We need to remember, like, I was inside the room when some of these decisions were made.


Yes, he was.  And last week,  Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan (NEW YORK TIMES) reported on the Situation Room meetings of Todd Blanche, Pam Bondi, Susie Wiles, JD Vance and other members of the administration to plot on how to deceive the American people about Epstein and specifically Chump's closeness to Epstein.  That would have been a strong topic to address. 




Ghislaine Maxwell has reportedly assembled a "highly secretive" prison group behind bars as more details behind her incarceration at a minimum security facility have been revealed, The Daily Mail reported on Tuesday.

The former partner and co-conspirator of Jeffrey Epstein has befriended three women and allegedly sees them as the "finest and best educated" among the population at Federal Prison Camp Bryan in Texas, according to The Mail. These friends include Bethany Cataldi, 54, "a disgraced doctor serving eight years for charging the government for non-existent procedures." Another is former CFO Antonietta Nguyen, 58, "who plundered $9 million from company funds to splurge on purses and luxury vacations."
Maxwell's reported best friend is Jennifer Bengston Cook, 58, a former bookkeeper who "wrote checks worth $1.6 million to herself."

"They are highly secretive. They whisper to one another and cover their mouths so nobody can understand what they are saying," a source told The Mail.
There are also reports of special privileges for Maxwell behind bars, including the decision over who she bunks with at the location. She has also only had one roommate, while most other prisoners have to bunk with two other people.

"The cozy arrangement caused a stink because it's normally up to prison counsellors to decide who sleeps where inside the 37-acre compound that accommodates 635 women," The Mail reported.





Yesterday, Democrats on the House Oversight Committee issued the following:

Washington, D.C. — Today, Rep. Robert Garcia, Ranking Member of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and Rep. Jamie Raskin, Ranking Member of the House Committee on the Judiciary, issued the following statement after Todd Blanche’s Bureau of Prisons (BOP) failed to answer basic questions relating the Committees’ investigation into Ghislaine Maxwell’s unprecedented prison transfer and preferential treatment at Federal Prison Camp (FPC) Bryan, following a Committee staff visit to the facility.

“Today, investigators from our Committees traveled to FPC Bryan, where Ghislaine Maxwell is serving her sentence, despite BOP policies barring sex offenders from this minimum-security facility absent a special waver. We went to Camp Bryan seeking answers about Ms. Maxwell’s unprecedented transfer and VIP treatment.

“While the Camp Bryan staff provided an extensive tour of the grounds and programming of the facility, Bureau of Prisons leadership repeatedly shut down our lines of questioning or could not provide basic information about our central concerns, including Ms. Maxwell’s extraordinary treatment, allegations of sexual assault at the facility, and retaliation against inmates who tried to blow the whistle. We also have serious concerns about the accuracy and veracity of information received by our investigative staff.

“The American people are tired of seeing the Trump Administration pamper a sex trafficker and obstruct Congress’s investigation into Attorney General Blanche’s role in ensuring Ms. Maxwell remains comfortable and quiet.

“This investigation will continue.”

###



In a note written on July 22, 2019, Jeffrey Epstein appeared to portray himself “as a victim of the #MeToo movement,” and also compared his situation to the 19th century antisemitic persecution of a French Army officer, The New York Times revealed Tuesday after obtaining a collection of “never seen before” notes from the convicted child sex offender.
The note in question was written four days after Epstein had been denied bail, and scrawled across the top was the phrase “J’ACCUSE,” which roughly translates to “I accuse” in English. The phrase, the Times notes, is a likely reference to the 1898 open letter of the same name accusing the French government of antisemitism for the persecution of Alfred Dreyfus, a military officer who was falsely accused of espionage and imprisoned on a brutal prison island.
“‘Jewish – Rich – Politics,’ he wrote, seemingly comparing himself to Dreyfus,” the Times’ report reads. “‘Believe the victim = Believe the Accuser’ he wrote, adding, ‘CRAZY!’”

It would also be just hours later after the note was written that Epstein would be discovered in his cell semi-conscious with a noose around his neck in what was reported to be a suicide attempt, though Epstein initially claimed his cellmate had attacked him before walking the allegation back.

Of course, many people attempted to help him make and form that argument over the years.  Intellectual Noem Chomsky was one.  Kathy Ruemmler was another.  


Let's wind down with this from Senator Patty Murray's office:

Murray slams the Inter-Agency Agreements inked today by the Education Department to offload the responsibilities of the Office for Civil Rights to Todd Blanche’s DOJ and the Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (OSERS) to RFK Jr.’s HHS

Washington, D.C. — Today, U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), Vice Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, issued the following statement on Education Secretary Linda McMahon’s announcement today that the Department of Education is illegally transferring the responsibilities of the Department’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) to the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (OSERS) to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) through Inter-Agency Agreements (IAA).

“The Trump administration is abandoning kids with disabilities and its most basic legal responsibility to protect the rights of every student in the classroom.

“After spending the last year smashing the Office for Civil Rights to pieces, President Trump and Secretary McMahon are now turning to Todd Blanche to deliver the final blow. And after spending months vowing she would protect students with disabilities, Secretary McMahon is ignoring the families of students with disabilities who pleaded with her not to entrust RFK Jr. with the responsibility of ensuring their kids get the education they deserve. It makes zero sense to scatter federal education programs all over the government—with different agencies managing different educational programs and each of them lacking the expertise to do it.  

“Instead of helping kids get a great education, this administration is spending its time, energy, and taxpayer resources fixated on where employees sit and illegally trying to shutter the Department of Education. It’s an outrageous betrayal that undoes decades of hard-won progress for students. More kids with disabilities will be denied the education they are entitled to by law, and more college students who were harassed or assaulted will go without the justice they are owed.

“Democrats tried hard to block these illegal arrangements in our most recent funding bill, but Republicans refused. It’s past time Republicans join us to say enough is enough. I’m going to keep fighting to force this administration to help students get the education they are entitled to under law.”

OCR is charged with enforcing federal civil rights laws to protect students’ rights in the classroom, and the Department of Education Organization Act of 1979 mandates the existence of the Office for Civil Rights at the Education Department to carry out these responsibilities.

Last year, the Trump administration thoughtlessly eliminated more than half of the staff in the Office for Civil Rights and closed half of the regional field offices, and in the time since, there has been a precipitous drop-off in the resolution of students’ cases. In 2025, the Department reached the lowest number of resolutions in 12 years and reached zero resolutions for students facing serious incidents including sexual harassment, sexual violence, seclusion, restraint, racial harassment, and discriminatory school discipline. Senator Murray has mobilized against the administration’s efforts to hollow out OCR, called out how it’s hurt students and families, and she’s repeatedly pressed Secretary McMahon on the issue.

OSERS is charged with implementing and enforcing the Rehabilitation Act and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), which mandate that students with disabilities get the free appropriate public education and independence they deserve. In April, Senator Murray pressed Secretary McMahon on her plans to potentially offload OSERS’ responsibilities and told McMahon: “That is exactly why these parents and advocates are spitting mad because what they want to make sure is that their child with a disability has an education.”

Senator Murray has aggressively pushed back against Secretary McMahon’s efforts to dismantle the Department, including through the illegal use of IAAs, and she fought to insert ironclad language in the fiscal year 2026 funding bill for the Department that would bar Secretary McMahon from using IAAs to dismantle the Department—but Republicans refused to include new, binding language that would block arrangements like the ones announced today.

###



Isaiah's THE WORLD TODAY JUST NUTS  "Miss Sassy Has A Book To Sell" and  "Bet He Had To Sit By Himself At Lunch As Well" went up last night.  The following sites -- plus Ann's "The racists" and Kat's "Taylor Swift, Bonnie Tyler, Carly Simon" -- updated:




Tuesday, June 16, 2026

Chump's hissy fit

Isaiah's THE WORLD TODAY JUST NUTS "Miss Sassy Has A Book To Sell


booksellingmiss sassy


 
Our Convicted Felon Donald Chump must be having a hissy fit.  Eren Waris (MEAWW) reports:

 Senate Majority leader John Thune publicly rejected President Donald Trump's latest legislative demand, calling it “not realistic” to tie a voter ID measure to a stalled national security surveillance bill.

His pushback exposed a widening divide between Senate Republicans and the White House. It also underscored growing frustration among GOP leaders as Trump continues inserting unrelated priorities into must-pass legislation.
The clash began after Trump declared on Truth Social that he would oppose renewing Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act unless lawmakers attached the Save America Act, a voter ID proposal he has repeatedly championed.

“I’m against FISA if it doesn’t come with The Save America Act (Full version!) firmly attached to it,” Trump wrote.
Hours later, Thune made clear the Senate was not planning to follow that path.

“I think the president wants to add Save America to pretty much everything, but that, you know, obviously, is not realistic to get the FISA bill done, and we want to get the FISA bill done,” Thune told reporters on Capitol Hill.


Oh, the Republicans will not go along with Mr. Chump blindly!!!!  Oh, he is going to have a hissy fit!  

He is now going to learn just how unimportant he truly is.  

Some comments on the article:

David zinger
1 hour ago
1. John Thune tells Trump 'no' after president demands voter ID bill tied to spy law
2. The reality is that Trump is and has been a con man, cheat, tax fraud, mortgage fraud, a mob boss, a Liar, a Racist, one of the most corrupt US President in recent memory and Trump's voter ID bill is a scam and Trump's desire to steal the midterm elections.


Searcher59 *
10 minutes ago
Thune has GROWN a BACKBONE, and Trump is turning into a LAME DUCK...

Debbie Dammen
9 hours ago
It’s about GD time Thune shows he has a spine!

In other news of bad news for Mr. Chump, Travis Gettys (RAW STORY) reports:

Internal contractor estimates reveal that President Donald Trump's East Wing replacement project carries a price tag far exceeding what he has told the public – with taxpayers footing most of the bill.

The Washington Post obtained a project summary prepared for the White House by contractor Clark Construction in early March that estimated the total construction cost at $600 million — $200 million more than the maximum figure Trump has ever cited publicly.

The documents also show that roughly $307 million of that total was projected to come from federal agencies funded by taxpayers, including the Secret Service and the White House Military Office, while only $293 million was expected to come from private sources.

When the project was first announced in July 2025, the White House said private donors would cover the entire $200 million cost. As estimates climbed — to $270 million, then $478 million, then $600 million — Trump's public statements never kept pace, and his insistence on full private funding never wavered.

Mr. Chump is a liar.   A big, fat liar.  


As much of the world started to come to terms with the purported framework to end the U.S. war in Iran, Sen. Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, appeared on “Fox News Sunday” and made clear that he was unimpressed. Indeed, the Rhode Island senator made clear that the United States’ interests were far better served by the Obama-era Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, which Donald Trump abandoned in 2017.
“First of all, we’re in a much worse position than we were under the JCPOA. The breakout time, that is, the time it would take to assemble enough enriched uranium to develop a weapon, was 12 months during the JCPOA. Today, it’s a week,” Reed said of Iran’s nuclear weapons program.

“We are negotiating against a country which its leadership has been eliminated. Now we have even more fanatical leadership who has much more invested and much more to leverage their position,” the senator added. “Abandoning the JCPOA was a bad mistake by the president.”

Trump, evidently, saw the interview and responded in a decidedly Trumpian way. The Hill reported:

President Trump on Sunday called for the impeachment of Democratic Sen. Jack Reed (R.I.), after the lawmaker criticized his decision to pull out of the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in his first term.

“Senator Jack Reed, a Dumocrat from R.I., lied when stating the the [sic] Deal we just made is not as good as the Obama disaster known as the JCPOA. Reed is either an outright fraud, or incompetent,” Trump wrote in a Sunday post on Truth Social.

The Republican’s missive, which referred to former President Barack Obama as “Obuma,” concluded, “Impeach Jack Reed!”

Impeach Jack Reed?  Impeach Senator Reed?  For what?  He has done nothing impeachable.  But Mr. Chump will not be able to say the same when Democrats come after him and call for his impachment.  

This is C.I.'s "The Snapshot" for today:


Tuesday, June 16, 2026.  Chump's 'deal' with Iran remains shrouded in secrecy, news of JD Vance advocating to implement the Insurrection Act hits the news cycle just as he was presenting a kinder and gentler fake JD in his new book, the administration considered suspending habeas corpus and much more.


The 'deal' that we were told would be reached over last weekend hasn't been.  It's said now that it will be released on Friday at which point, We The People will know what our government agreed to.  Ben (MEIDASTOUCH NEWS) covers it in the video below. 





Several high-ranking U.S. officials are privately skeptical of the memorandum of understanding with Iran signed by the Trump administration, Axios reported on Monday.

On Sunday, President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance signed the memo with Iranian officials to put the countries on a pathway to end the war. Details of the arrangement are sparse, but it reportedly involves Iran reopening the Strait of Hormuz and agreeing to nuclear inspections. In exchange, the U.S. will end the naval blockade of Iran, unfreeze Iranian assets, and allow the country access to a $300 billion reconstruction fund. The latter provision has been both floated by Vance and denied by Trump.

Politicians and pundits have called on the administration to release the text of the memo.

On Monday, Axios reported that top officials in Trump’s circle have serious doubts about the deal. These include Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, and CIA Director John Ratcliffe. 



President Donald Trump isn’t likely to admit he shares a penchant for dealmaking with one of his predecessors, Bill Clinton, that’s become more evident with the opaque agreement to end the U.S. war with Iran.

The deal, which has lifted Asian and European stocks to record highs and looks set to power U.S. stocks back towards their record peaks of early June, takes a page out of Clinton’s Middle East playbook by unveiling a sweeping agreement on a key principal, but leaving the more difficult—and potentially deal-breaking—discussions for another day.



Further details will be sorted out in the next phase of negotiations, which is expected to last for roughly 60 days. That includes ironing out the process for destroying and disposing of Iran’s highly enriched uranium stockpile.

“Our expectation is that the strait is going to be opened in a toll-free way for the long term, and that’s the sort of thing that we’re going to figure out in these technical negotiations,” Vance said, adding that the U.S. has “all the cards” in the talks.

Trump muddied matters Sunday by saying that Iran could immediately resume oil exports and that the U.S. would lift its blockade of Iranian ports once the agreement was signed. For weeks, administration officials asserted Iran would get no financial lifeline or relief from the blockade until it had followed through on dismantling its nuclear work. Iran insisted it would first get at least $12 billion from its frozen assets abroad before fresh nuclear talks begin, a statement U.S. officials quickly denied.

American lawmakers are already angling to have their say in approving or scuttling the accord. Democrats who opposed the war met Trump’s announcement with tepid support in hopes of reopening the strait. But some Republicans, largely supportive of Trump, still signaled their reservations.

“Under our law, any nuclear deal with Iran will be sent to Congress for review and a vote,” South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham, a prominent Iran hawk and Trump ally, said in a social-media post Sunday. “I look forward to reviewing the final product and I believe it is imperative that the architect of the deal, Vice President Vance and his negotiating partners, be part of the process in presenting the final deal to Congress.”






On the heels of his disappointing nonsense on Sunday, Chump is now planning a July 4th event -- a rally at the Lincoln Memorial entitled "Tribute to America." Riya Misra (POLITICO) notes:


It’s his latest effort to cast the nation’s marquee anniversary in his own likeness. On his 80th birthday Sunday, Trump transformed the White House lawn into a fighting ring, officially kicking off the birthday celebrations — both America’s and his — with one of his favorite sports. (Trump has been a decades-long fixture at Ultimate Fighting Championship matches, and CEO Dana White is a close friend).

“More than 300 Members of our strong and talented Military Bands, Orchestras, and Ceremonial Units, will perform Patriotic Melodies and American Classics,” he wrote, “and my Playlist (We will have none of those people that put you to sleep and constantly complain!) ....”

“Do not miss it,” he continued.

His face will be stamped on America 250-themed passports and coinage. And he’ll personally headline the Great American State Fair, a two-week showcase on the National Mall, after half of the event’s performers withdrew, citing concerns about the fair’s ties to Trump. Meanwhile, the fair will feature a slate of conservative outlets, including evangelical and religious groups, political advocacy organizations and an anti-LGBTQ+ ministry.


Only some people, please note, are invited to celebrate.  Leave it to Chump and his posse of hatred to bring in anti-LGBTQ+ ministry.   Hafiz Rashid (THE NEW REPUBLIC) notes:

One day after celebrating his 80th birthday with a UFC spectacle on the White House lawn, President Trump looked like he was feeling every bit his age while visiting France for the G7 summit.

Speaking with the media with French President Emmanuel Macron Monday, Trump was struggling to keep his eyes open as Macron praised the developments on peace with Iran, even as Macron often turned to Trump to acknowledge his efforts.
Later, appearing outdoors with Macron and his wife Brigitte, Trump looked tired and his right hand appeared swollen and discolored.

Sagging worse than Chump at the G7?  His poll numbers.  Cameron Adams (DAILY BEAST) notes:

Donald Trump has received an unwanted birthday present—a new poll showing his approval rating has hit a new low in his second term as president.

Trump, who turned 80 on Sunday, crashed out in the latest NBC News poll, awkwardly released on his birthday.

The polling found his approval rating among all American adults currently sits at 39 percent. Trump’s approval rating among registered voters dropped to 42 percent, matching his lowest point from July 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic and the reaction to the murder of George Floyd.
Almost two-thirds of independent voters disapprove of the job Trump is doing as president, and there has been a slight fall in his support from Republicans.

Meanwhile Miss Sassy JD Vance is out promoting his latest book.  He talks about his "cat lady" remarks and calls it a mistake he's learned from.  He says nothing similar about the lie that Haitian immigrants were eating cats in Ohio.  More to the point, he says nothing about the Insurrection Act.  Something he called for invoking months ago.  



Top White House officials reportedly debated whether Donald Trump should invoke the Insurrection Act after federal agents killed two protesters in Minnesota, but feared the political and public relations blowback over images of U.S. troops on American streets.

The president repeatedly threatened to invoke the law in his nationwide campaign to rapidly deport tens of thousands of people from Democratic-led cities patrolled by hundreds of masked and heavily armed officers.
But discussions reportedly came to a head after federal immigration agents fatally shot Renee Good and Alex Pretti during January’s demonstrations in Minneapolis, according to Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan of The New York Times for their forthcoming book Regime Change: Inside the Imperial Presidency of Donald Trump.

Days after Pretti was killed, Vice President JD Vance reportedly walked into the office of White House chief of staff Susie Wiles to make the case that the president should send a message to protesters by invoking the Insurrection Act.

Trump’s opponents warned for months that a surge of militarized Homeland Security officers would only stir up more unrest, giving the president an opening to invoke the Insurrection Act to deploy active-duty troops into cities run by his political enemies.

A previously unreported confidential memo was circulated among White House officials in October 2025 as the president publicly declared his right to invoke the Insurrection Act to crush protests against his mass deportation efforts.


That was only one of the horrendous things the administration was plotting.  Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan (NEW YORK TIMES) report:

Last spring, Will Scharf, an arch-conservative lawyer serving as the White House staff secretary, wrote a secret memo to the chief of staff that reflected growing unease in the West Wing about one of the extreme measures being weighed by Stephen Miller, the powerful adviser driving President Trump’s deportation campaign.

Dated April 29, 2025, and stamped “confidential,” the memo was careful and lawyerly but amounted to a warning against end-running the rule of law. The subject line read: “THE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS.”

Habeas corpus — the centuries-old right to force the government to justify, before a judge, why it has locked a person up — is enshrined in Article I of the Constitution. Mr. Scharf’s memo, in its unassuming way, was a blinking red warning light. The second Trump White House was deliberating an explosive new claim of presidential power: the suspension of habeas rights for unauthorized immigrants.

The suspension of habeas corpus has occurred just a handful of times in U.S. history, and always under the most dire circumstances of war or invasion. Yet to a greater degree than previously known, administration officials, encouraged by Mr. Trump, actively weighed taking that step in the early months of his second term — this time to accelerate the mass deportation of immigrants in the country illegally.

[. . .]

The Constitution, Mr. Scharf wrote in his memo to Susie Wiles, the White House chief of staff, permits suspension of habeas corpus only in cases of rebellion or invasion. Courts have almost uniformly held that only Congress can do it.

He added: “Even where Congress has explicitly suspended habeas corpus rights, the Supreme Court has held that some alternative process must be provided to defendants, with procedural safeguards akin to a habeas corpus action.”


Some members of the administration were angling to throw out the Constitution.  So when one of them says that -- "thorw out the Constitution" -- in a live interview on TV, we need to be alarmed.  Sunday, a Cabinet Secretary did just that.  In other news, Alex Galbraith (SALON) notes:

Department of Homeland Security head Markwayne Mullin said he’s willing to go to extreme lengths to fight the nonexistent scourge of voter fraud in the upcoming midterm elections.

The Republican senator from Oklahoma told CNN‘s Dana Bash that he’s ready to “throw out the Constitution” to make sure “only citizens of the United States are voting.”

“What we want to make sure is that every vote actually counts, that we’re not having games like you might see in sanctuary cities. I’m not saying they are,” he said. “Democrats always want to throw out the Constitution all the time. Well, great, let’s throw out the Constitution.”

When Bash gave Mullin a questioning look, he immediately backpedaled.

“I mean, not throw it out. Throw it out as an argument,” he said. “I’m glad you had that look on your face.”


No, he meant throw out the Constitution.  He's an idiot.  He took an oath to the Constitution when he was sworn in the US Senate and he took an oath to it when he became Secretary of Homeland Security.  Someone doesn't appear smart enough to grasp what taking an oath means. 

The next time he appears before Congress, he needs to be asked about those remarks. 




Meanwhile, Aaron Blake (CNN) examines Chump's vainty projects:


President Donald Trump’s efforts to turn his second term into a big vanity project largely focused on himself are looking increasingly messy.

It would be one thing for him to go to such great lengths to build an elaborate White House ballroom and slap his name on buildings in the best of times; but Trump’s timing would seem exceedingly tone deaf, given most Americans are more concerned about their own pocketbooks than honoring a historically unpopular president.

And repeatedly in recent days and weeks, the administration’s initiatives have run into roadblocks and its efforts to embellish Washington, DC, (often by skirting the law) have looked rather haphazard.

Perhaps most striking was Trump’s setback at the Kennedy Center.

After he effectively hijacked the center’s board by installing loyalists, the board moved to — surprise! — put Trump’s name on the building late last year. They added it alongside the deceased president whose name was on the building as a matter of federal law.

But after the courts predictably ruled that was illegal, the administration has had to confront the optics of taking Trump’s name off the building. As I wrote earlier this month, that removal threatened to be “an indelible — and telling — image.”

And lo, when the Kennedy Center was compelled to take Trump’s name off the building this weekend, it was conveniently done in the middle of the night. Scaffolding was constructed and tarps were hung to obstruct those assembled from viewing it.

By Monday, the face of the building was still covered up.

Speaking of things not exactly going according to plan: Trump and many allies have celebrated his administration’s legally dubious effort to paint the bottom of the Lincoln Memorial’s Reflecting Pool dark blue.

While perhaps a commendable idea, the cost of the project ballooned from Trump’s initial estimate of $1.8 million to more than $14 million. The contractor was also given a no-bid contract, which is generally reserved for special circumstances. The New York Times also reported that the company was allowed a profit margin much higher than normal, according to a National Park Service analysis.

And now, less than a week after Trump announced the project was finished, the Reflecting Pool has been overrun with algae, turning the water a familiar shade of green.


With more on The Kennedy Center, let's note Liz Dye (ABOVE THE LAW)



This weekend, two formerly lauded public institutions humiliated themselves in spectacular fashion. By Sunday, one was shrouded in thousands of yards of tarpaulin — a translucent prophylactic, hiding an old man’s flaccid defeat. The other dangled limply in the breeze, its useless degradation on full display.

The occasion of this display of onanism was the courts’ refusal to let Trump rechristen the Kennedy Center in honor of himself. After booting the prior board, he filled out the roster with cronies and wives of cronies, led by “an amazing Chairman, DONALD J. TRUMP!” His henchmen, including sentient s[**]tpost Ric Grenell, as executive director, set about alienating every artist to the left of Lee Greenwood. By happenstance, the patriotic pop singer is the only artist currently on the Kennedy Center’s Board.

In December, the Board announced that it had agreed to rename the institution “The Donald J. Trump and John F. Kennedy Memorial Center for the Performing Arts.” The decision was “unanimous,” thanks to the recently amended bylaws, which purported to strip voting rights from ex officio trustees. The steady trickle of artist cancellations increased to a tsunami. Faced with the evaporation of the 2026 season, the Board voted to shut the Center down entirely for two years, accelerating a planned renovation that had been scheduled to take place in stages to allow performances to continue.

Rep. Joyce Beatty, one of those disenfranchised ex officio board members, sued to block the changes, and on May 29, she won. Judge Christopher Cooper granted summary judgment on the name change and the voting issue, ruling that the Board’s actions violated the plain language of the Kennedy Center’s organic statute. He issued a preliminary injunction voiding the vote to shut the place down, finding that the Trump trustees violated their fiduciary duty consider the long-term health of the institution when they simply obeyed Trump’s demand to close up shop.

The judge ordered the Center to reverse the name change and remove all signage within 14 days, and initially it looked like the Board intended to comply. On June 4, management sent a memo to the remaining staff instructing them to immediately remove all references to the “Trump” Kennedy Center from the website and their email signatures. But then on June 11, just hours before the deadline, the Board noticed its appeal to the DC Circuit and requested that Judge Cooper stay his ruling.

That motion was pretty desultory, even by the low standards of the current DOJ — just five mumbled pages, rehashing rejected arguments and asserting without evidence that taking Trump’s name off the building would decimate fundraising. Judge Cooper rejected it in a cursory minute order citing “both the de minimis resources that would be required to restore the Center’s current name in the event of a successful appeal and the lack of record evidence linking increased donations to the current name.”

As this was going on, workers began constructing scaffolding in front of the building, and a crowd gathered to watch Trump’s name come down — our own little toppling of the Saddam statue. Construction stopped mid-afternoon, putatively because of a brief rain shower, but more likely because the Justice Department had filed an emergency request for a stay from the DC Circuit.


Let's wind down with this from Senator Elizabeth Warren's office:

New Trustees Report reveals Trump’s policies accelerate Social Security Trust Fund insolvency as top Republicans threaten Social Security benefit cuts

Text of Letter (PDF)

Washington, D.C. — U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.), and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) pressed President Donald Trump on Republican threats to Social Security after a new Trustees Report revealed that Republican policies are accelerating Social Security’s insolvency. The letter also follows a series of comments from Trump administration officials and Republican leaders in Congress suggesting that they support benefit cuts.

“[T]hese comments cast fresh doubt on your ‘sacred pledge’ to ‘always protect Social Security’ – and your failure to respond to our previous requests for assurances – we urge you to clarify the administration’s stance on raising the retirement age,” wrote the senators.

The Social Security Administration's 2026 Trustees Report revealed that Trump and Congressional Republicans’ One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) will worsen the trust fund's finances and accelerate its insolvency.

Republicans have long supported increasing the retirement age, privatizing Social Security, or otherwise cutting Social Security benefits — and some have continued to make explicit threats even after Trump promised not to ‘touch’ Social Security. Just last week, House Speaker Mike Johnson indicated that Republicans intend to cut Social Security, along with Medicare and Medicaid, if they are in a position to do so next Congress. Social Security Commissioner Frank Bisignano previously indicated that raising the retirement age — a critical cut to Americans’ benefits — is under consideration.

A Senate Republican in a March Budget Committee hearing also suggested raising the retirement age — which would, in practice, reduce the median retiree’s monthly benefits and disproportionately harm low-income seniors. And Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Administrator Mehmet Oz called for Americans to delay their retirement and work longer in order to pay for the federal deficit, which Trump’s OBBBA increased.

“The new estimates showing that your OBBBA will hasten the demise of the Social Security trust fund, the ongoing pattern of comments suggesting that Republicans will seek to increase the retirement age or otherwise cut Social Security benefits, and the SSA customer service chaos that is occurring under your watch and making it more difficult for older Americans to interact with the agency when they need assistance raise new questions about whether you will break – or are already – breaking your promise to ‘not touch’ Social Security,” wrote the senators.

"Raising the retirement age – or otherwise cutting benefits – only worsens the looming retirement income crisis, and, as we outlined in our initial letter to you, doing so hurts older Americans, cutting monthly benefits and forcing millions into poverty," continued the senators.

The senators pressed President Trump for answers to a series of questions regarding the administration's plans for Social Security, including whether he supports raising the retirement age, whether he would veto legislation that increases the age of eligibility for Social Security, and whether White House officials have discussed raising the retirement age with Administrator Oz. The senators requested a response by June 27, 2026.

Senator Warren has introduced legislation that would expand Social Security benefits by $2,400 a year and ensure Social Security is fully funded for the next 75 years while not raising taxes on over 91 percent of American households.

Senate Democrats’ Social Security War Room coordinates Democrats’ fight to defend Social Security, encourages grassroots engagement by providing opportunities for Americans to share what Social Security means to them, and educates Senate staff, the American public, and stakeholders about Republicans’ agenda and their continued cuts to Americans’ Social Security services and benefits:

  • In June 2026, U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), a Member of the Senate Finance Committee, and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Ranking Member of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (PSI), pressed Social Security Administration (SSA) Commissioner Frank Bisignano and three former Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) staffers on an alarming new whistleblower account detailing Trump administration plans to mark 2.7 million people as dead in a Social Security database as part of its immigration enforcement agenda.

  • In April 2026, Senate Democrats’ Social Security War Room, led by U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), published a new report highlighting how, in its first year, it has fought to protect Americans’ Social Security benefits.

  • In March 2026, at a hearing of the Senate Special Committee on Aging, U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) questioned Dan Adcock of the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare about Republicans’ plans to raise the retirement age.

  • In March 2026, Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Angela Alsobrooks (D-Md.), Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.), Ranking Member of the Special Committee on Aging Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), Ben Ray Lujan (D-N.M.), Patty Murray (D-Wash.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), and Ranking Member of the Committee on Finance Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) launched a new investigation into the Social Security Administration’s (SSA) ongoing customer service crisis reaching new extremes, the latest from Senate Democrats’ Social Security War Room.

  • In March 2026, U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Representatives Adelita Grijalva (D-Ariz.), Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.), and James Moylan (R-GU) led over 30 lawmakers in introducing the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) Restoration Act, a bipartisan bill to strengthen critical SSI benefits that support nearly 8 million seniors and Americans with disabilities.

  • In December 2025, U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Senator Peter Welch (D-Vt.), a member of the Senate Finance Committee, and U.S. Representative Gabe Amo (D-RI-01) introduced the Social Security Survivor Benefits Equity Act, bicameral legislation to increase the Social Security Administration’s (SSA) lump-sum death benefit, which covers costs associated with cremation or burials for surviving family members, to account for inflation.

  • In December 2025, U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.); Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Ranking Member of the Senate Finance Committee; Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP); and Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), Ranking Member of the Senate Special Committee on Aging, wrote to Social Security Administration (SSA) Commissioner Frank Bisignano, pressing him on reports that the agency has a new goal of slashing field office visits by nearly 15 million annually.

  • In November 2025, Senate Banking Committee Ranking Member Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Senate Finance Committee Ranking Member Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), both leading members of the Senate Democrats’ Social Security War Room, launched a probe into Social Security Administration (SSA) Commissioner Frank Bisignano’s tenure as chief executive officer at Fiserv.

  • In October 2025, U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) led Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), Senate Finance Committee Ranking Member Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), and Senators Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), Angela Alsobrooks (D-Md.), Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), Tina Smith (D-Minn.), and Peter Welch (D-Vt.) in introducing the Social Security Emergency Inflation Relief Act.

  • In September 2025, U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Ranking Member of the Senate Subcommittee on Social Security, Pensions, and Family Policy, and Senate Democrats’ Social Security War Room leaders today introduced the Keep Billionaires Out of Social Security Act.

  • In July 2025, U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), a leader of the Senate Democrats’ Social Security War Room, secured key commitments and admissions from Social Security Administration (SSA) Commissioner Frank Bisignano during a private meeting.

  • In June 2025, U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Ranking Member of the Senate Finance Committee, pressed top Trump administration officials on how President Trump’s chaotic tariffs — paired with his efforts to dismantle the Social Security Administration — are harming America’s seniors.

  • In May 2025, U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Ranking Member of the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee, Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Ranking Member of the Senate Finance Committee, and Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), Ranking Member on the Senate Aging Committee, pressed new Commissioner of the Social Security Administration Frank Bisignano on reported plans to recategorize thousands of workers as Schedule F “policy-making” employees.

  • In May 2025, U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Ranking Member of the Senate Finance Committee Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), and Ranking Member of the Senate Aging Committee Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) welcomed newly-confirmed Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (SSA) Frank Bisignano to the agency with copies of 17 letters — containing nearly 200 unanswered questions — the lawmakers had previously sent to the SSA under Acting Commissioner Leland Dudek.

  • In April 2026, U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Ranking Member on the Senate Finance Committee Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), and Ranking Member on the Senate Special Committee on Aging Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) led a coalition of over 100 Congressional Democrats in writing to the Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (SSA), Leland Dudek, to demand that he keep Social Security field offices open.

###






The following sites -- plus Ann's "Chump, Rogan and Hokit" and Rebecca's "chump is a failure" --  updated: