Monday, September 28, 2026

Chump gets called a chump by THE WALL STREET JOURNAL


Convicted Felon Donald Chump is fading in the polls.  Marina Dunbar (GUARDIAN) reports: 

US senator Thom Tillis on Sunday criticized Donald Trump, his fellow Republican, for the president’s support of Ken Paxton over incumbent John Cornyn in the Texas Senate Republican primary.

“He made a colossal mistake,” Tillis, a frequent Trump critic from North Carolina, said during an interview on CNN’s State of the Union in reference to the president’s support of Paxton who defeated Cornyn in the May primary.
“John Cornyn’s a great member of the US Senate. Paxton has his challenges,” the retiring Tillis added. “We would not be spending tens or hundreds of millions of dollars in Texas if Cornyn had won.”

Tillis pointed to the president’s involvement in the contest and described Trump’s decision to back Paxton instead of Cornyn as an “unforced error” that has put the Senate seat at risk for the GOP.
Trump endorsed Paxton just days before the Texas attorney general defeated Cornyn, a four-term senator, and advanced to face Democratic candidate James Talarico, a in the general election on 3 November.

The race had wide implications for Trump’s strength heading into November’s midterm federal elections. Paxton will now face Talarico, a Democratic pastor and state legislator whose message of peace and populism has attracted much attention. If he wins, Talarico would become the first Democrat in more than 30 years to win statewide office in Texas.

Mr. Chump is a moron.  His problems are always of his own making.  Annabella Rosciglione (DAILY BEAST) reports on the idiotic offer Mr. Chump made last week: 
 

President Donald Trump offered China the chance to buy U.S. weapons in an astonishing proposal.

During Chinese President Xi Jinping’s state visit to Washington, Trump at one point asked him if he would be interested in buying American weapons, U.S. Ambassador to China David Perdue admitted.

The U.S. last approved $11 billion in sales of U.S. arms to Taiwan in December 2025, as China has been flirting with the idea of invading the small island to take it over.
When asked by Fox News on Sunday about the administration’s stance on Taiwan’s independence, Perdue made the stunning admission that Trump had actually offered Xi weapons.

“President Trump continues to say, ‘Hey, we sell arms to other people around the world.’ He actually asked President Xi if he would like to buy some, at one point,” Perdue said.

That confession received no further inquiry or pushback from Fox host Shannon Bream. The Daily Beast has reached out to the White House for more information.

Trump’s offer to Xi marks a stunning departure from decades of U.S. foreign policy that outright bans China from purchasing U.S. arms.

Some comments on the article:

Vance Peeler
14 hours ago
So if this is true, we now have a traitorous president offering to sell weapons to the leader of the Chinese communist party and an authoritarian who has his government and citizens in a chokehold and will never relinquish power. Furthermore, a man who's ultimate goal is world domination, and the idiot in the white house is affording him the means to further that goal. 
So to all maga morons, that is what YOUR president is doing. The white house and America is for sale. Is that ok??

katy emerson
16 hours ago
For those that missed this...... what he's doing with Taiwan arms package is the same basic behavior that the law prohibits under the Impound Control Act of 1974.  
“Trump has delayed a more recent $14 billion arms package for Taiwan for several months… describing it as a ‘very good negotiating chip’ in his discussions with China.”
That is exactly the kind of unilateral withholding of congressionally appropriated funds that the Impoundment Control Act (ICA) forbids. Calling it a “negotiating chip” adds to the seriousness.  
Why is anyone wanting to support this man who is maneuvering to take over our country.

 

Gerry Laga
16 hours ago
If true, this is absolute madness. Considering the history of China's espionage attempts (often successful) to steal design and manufacturing secrets of US weapon designs, Trump proposes to SELL them whole, functioning advanced weapons for their engineers to study?
Once, again, Trump revels himself to be an agent of foreign enemies of the USA. 
Happy with that, MAGA?

Daniel Callaghan
17 hours ago
Is anyone disturbed by the Coward-in-Chief's offer to provide weapons to China, a country now providing intelligence to Iran that could cause American deaths? See, it's all about money with him. not Americans, not soldiers.

Lee Moran (HUFFINGTON POST) notes Mr. Chump's perverse relationship with Russian President Vladimir Putin continues:

The Wall Street Journal has torched Donald Trump’s invitation to Russian President Vladimir Putin to attend the G-20 summit that will be hosted at his Trump National Doral club in Miami, Florida, in December, calling the move “morally offensive.”

The Rupert Murdoch-owned newspaper’s conservative editorial board slammed Trump for extending the invitation “even as Western intelligence services warn that Russia is escalating its hybrid war against NATO countries,” and as Putin’s devastating war on Ukraine continues.
Putin’s attendance would amount to “a photo-op to show Russians that he’s no longer a pariah on the world stage” and “a global rehabilitation gift even as the Russian public grows tired of the war,” the board wrote.

It warned the invitation may even lead Putin to believe “he could get away with a targeted attack on NATO.”

The board also dismissed the possibility that restoring Putin to the global stage could encourage him to end the war in Ukraine. It argued that Trump merely looked “like a chump” following his 2025 summit with Putin in Alaska, after which the conflict continued.


They are correct, Mr. Chump does look like a chump. 

This is C.I.'s "The Snapshot" for today:

Monday, September 28, 2026.  Chump wastes tax payer money to propagandize himself, Hegseth stands accused of using tax dollars to promote voting for the GOP on the part of the military, Chump attacks one of the few House members who tries to appease him, Toad Blanche disgraces himself on ABC's THIS WEEK, and much more. 





As President Trump ran to return to the White House in 2024, his campaign released a somber, black-and-white ad in which he railed against the “deep state” and vowed to expel “warmongers” from government.

“This is the final battle,” Mr. Trump is heard saying in the online ad, which shows him walking silently down a hallway.

That ad has returned this weekend, airing on television stations across the country, with one notable difference: As it ends, the words “Paid for by the U.S. Government” appear on the screen.

The spot is the latest in a series of pro-Trump ads funded by public money. Some ethics experts have argued that the Trump administration is violating federal laws banning the use of taxpayer dollars for propaganda, and the ads have drawn criticism from both parties. The most recent ad, one expert argued, is a more flagrant violation given its prior use in the political arena.
“The president and his administration have gone from breaking the law to trampling it,” said Norm Eisen, a former White House special counsel for ethics and government reform under Barack Obama, who has sued the Trump administration several times. “The prior ad was bad enough, but this one openly repurposes prior political conduct.”


Today on MORNING JOE (MS NOW), Joe offered his take on Chump's propaganda.




Chump's not the only one doing propaganda.  Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling (THE NEW REPUBLIC) notes: 

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth directed America’s service members and their families to vote in the midterm election, not-so-subtly suggesting Friday that they could make the difference in some districts predicted to vote blue.

He cited a 2024 presidential election analysis as evidence, claiming that 300,000 “warriors” were not registered to vote that year.

“That’s more than the ballots cast in cities like Detroit, Boston, Milwaukee, or Seattle,” Hegseth said in a video statement, specifically naming liberal cities.

“As you know, the war department exists to protect our nation and her freedoms. That includes the freedom to decide who leads us, and the right to vote,” Hegseth continued. “Regardless of your home state or current duty status, you can use a standardized federal postcard to register and request a ballot, and if you’re forward deployed and your standard ballot is delayed, you can use the federal write-in absentee ballot. All of these processes are straightforward and protected by law.”


It was a busy weekend for Chump as he attacked US House Rep Maria Elvira Salazar.  For what?  From the September 18th snapshot:

46 days until the midterms and things are not looking good for Chump.  Dan Gooding (NEWSWEEK) reports on a new ad taped by US House Rep Maria Elvira Salazar, a Republican:


Maria Elvira Salazar, who represents Florida’s 27th Congressional District covering a large part of south Miami, has advocated for immigration reform alongside some Democratic colleagues in the House. While Trump and the wider GOP have advocated for tough immigration policies, some Republican lawmakers covering areas with large immigrant populations have found themselves in a difficult position.

In the video ad, which appeared to have been shot outside the White House, Salazar warned Trump to “be careful” over what his advisers were telling him, adding: “The same Hispanics who helped you get to the White House in 2024 feel betrayed today.”

The day after the 2024 election, Salazar said in an interview she didn’t believe the incoming administration would target undocumented immigrants with no criminal record.


A little space.  Tiny.  And it got even smaller as last weekend progressed.  Salazar was on a public affairs program.  She appeared on CBS' FACE THE NATION two Sundays ago.:


MARGARET BRENNAN: Let me ask you about something you put out there this week. You have been speaking for months about your concerns regarding President Trump's immigration policies. But in this ad you put out, you're more direct. You said, the same Hispanics who helped Trump get to the White House in 2024, feel betrayed. His enforcement efforts have gone too far, and half of the 50,000 people detained in July had no criminal record.  You spoke to the president after this. Did he take any of your…

REPRESENTATIVE MARIA ELVIRA SALAZAR: Yes, I did.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Did he take any of your advice?

REPRESENTATIVE MARIA ELVIRA SALAZAR: Listen, it was a very good conversation.  He was a gentleman, very courteous, very receptive. And I told him exactly what you just repeated: "Sir, you have this – this moment in history where you can keep the pot of gold that you brought to the GOP in 2024. No other president" – and you know I covered for 35 years Spanish television.  "No other president was able to convince the – the Hispanics to vote 55 points for a GOP president. Please preserve that fortune that you have brought to the party."  Why? Because we need to continue winning elections, because we have this very big threat called the socialists on the Democratic side. And if you want me, we can talk about that later. I belong to the Miami community. I'm the daughter of political refugees. I'm first-generation American, and I want to preserve the American values that are entrenched in the GOP…

MARGARET BRENNAN: Yes.

REPRESENTATIVE MARIA ELVIRA SALAZAR: … and that the Hispanics share.  "So, remember, sir, that you are the only guy who can do this."  And that – and then we had a fantastic conversation. I certainly hope he listened to what I was saying. But he listened.


Fantastic conversation, Salazar gushed, "he listened"!!!


Was she still gushing this past weekend? 


Evan Gorelick and Tim Balk (NEW YORK TIMES) report:

President Trump on Saturday amplified online comments critical of Representative MarĂ­a Elvira Salazar, a Florida Republican who earlier this month released an ad directly rebuking his immigration crackdown.

Mr. Trump reposted on social media screenshots of more than a dozen comments from other accounts that criticized Ms. Salazar, who is up for re-election in November. One of the comments urged Mr. Trump to rescind his endorsement of her, and another said she ought to be replaced with “a NEW Republican.”

The comments were reactions to a post on X sharing a Washington Post report about Latino voters in Ms. Salazar’s district who took issue with Ms. Salazar’s ad and continue to support Mr. Trump.

Ms. Salazar’s campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment.


I know what Salazar's comment would be:  "But he listened!!!!"

She humiliated herself bragging on his last Sunday and he's ripping her apart. 

Ben Johansen and Ali Bianco (POLITICO) report:

President Donald Trump on Saturday escalated his criticism of Rep. Maria Elvira Salazar (R-Fla.), amplifying a series of social media posts attacking the Florida Republican and, in multiple instances, calling for her replacement ahead of her election in just over a month.

Trump reposted more than a dozen messages criticizing Salazar on Truth Social, the president’s social media platform, including one user’s post that read: “So we need a NEW Republican to Replace Salazar.” Several Trump loyalists, including Laura Loomer, have for months called on the president to abandon his endorsement of her.

[. . .]

The posts mark the sharpest break yet between Trump and Salazar, whom he gave his “Complete and Total Endorsement” for reelection as recently as August for doing a “truly fantastic job” representing Florida’s 27th Congressional District.ekend for Chump 


 On ABC's THIS WEEK Sunday, Martha Raddatz spoke with cry baby and liar Todd Blanche.  The president's personal attorney now filling the spot as Attorney General was rude and dishonest. 


RADDATZ: President Trump responding to questions the day he banned multiple press outlets from access to the White House, a move put on temporary hold by a federal judge this week. Attorney General Todd Blanche joins me now.  Good morning, and thank you so much for joining us this morning. Let's get right to this. There was no TV pool coverage of the president's trip to Tennessee this weekend. It was supposed to be CNN. They said they were banned from Air Force One.  What is the justification for denying access?

TODD BLANCHE, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL:  Well, the president hasn't denied access. That's not the right way to describe it. This is -- what the president has said is that he is sick and tired of certain media outlets just refusing to report accurate news, and so -- look, it is a -- it is a privilege -- it is a privilege to be in the White House for anybody.


The privilege for anybody?  That applies to the president.  It is a privilege for him to live in our White House.  As such, he needs to stop with all of his tear downs and builds up.  He's refused to follow the process and he's done real damage.  So until Toad is willing to discuss that aspect, he's probably better off keep his lying mouth shut on privilege.


It is not a privilege for the journalists to be in the White House.  It is their job, it is their duty. 


TOAD BLANCHE:  And that -- and the president -- the president knows that it's the people's house, and what you saw play out over the past week was really not just not -- even after the judge -- even after the White House let the reporters back in, they still refuse to use pool coverage. They still refuse to, on their own, make a decision to start covering the president again with the video.  But a lot of people saw the president. The president was not hidden from the American people at the -- at the football game in Tennessee yesterday.


Yes, he was in Tennessee yesterday.  And he wasn't hidden at that football game.  And the crowd reacted, didn't they, Toad?


Raven Brunner (PEOPLE) reported:

 President Donald Trump made an appearance in Knoxville, Tenn., on Saturday, Sept. 26, when the Tennessee Volunteers hosted the top-ranked Texas Longhorns in a much-anticipated college football clash.

The president, 80, was loudly booed by some fans at Neyland Stadium when he appeared on the Jumbotron, as captured in video footage shared on social media. He could be seen sitting in a box next to Tennessee Sen. Marsha Blackburn as he did several fist pumps for the crowd. 


Danielle Campoamor (US) reported:

President Donald Trump received a not-so-warm welcome while attending the biggest college football game of the week. The commander-in-chief, 80, was loudly booed shortly after he was introduced at the highly-anticipated Saturday, September 26, matchup between No. 1 Texas and No. 14 Tennessee.

[. . .]

 Trump’s Saturday appearance and subsequent reception was far from the first time the command-in-chief has received a cold shoulder from a large crowd.

Amid rising gas and diesel prices, rising inflation and an increase in the cost of living, the ongoing war in Iran and a historically low approval rating, Trump was also loudly booed while appearing at this year’s 2026 World Cup Final. After Jennifer Hudson performed a stunning rendition of the U.S. national anthem on July 19, Trump was shown clapping while standing from his section inside Metlife Stadium in East Rutherford, New Jersey.

As the camera panned to him, Trump was audibly booed by the audience. He watched the match — where defending champs Argentina faced off against Spain — beside his wife, Melania Trump, and FIFA President Gianni Infantino. (Spain emerged victorious, winning 1-0.) Trump was also met by a loud chorus of boos while appearing at Game 3 of the 2026 NBA Finals between the New York Knicks and the San Antonio Spurs. (The Knicks lost 115-111, with many critics blaming the president’s appearance for the New York team’s only loss of the championship series.)


Toad left that information out of his narrative.  He was one-sided -- as he accuses the press of being.


TOAD BLANCHE:   And really, the unfortunate and sad thing here is that after years and years and years of one-sided media coverage of the president from certain outlets, the president finally said it's not fair to the American people that this is happening and did something about it.   

[. . .]

BLANCHE:  The president has every right to decide who gets to fly on his plane, and it is national security, especially on Air Force One, and especially at the White House. And so, it's not just -- it's not just the fact that they refuse to report anything accurately.  By the way, that is what is a national security problem. When you have completely misinformation, complete misinformation coming out of the White House, that affects our relationship with our foreign partners, that affects our relationship with our foreign enemies. And so this is -- this is just not about the fact that they're refusing to report accurate news. It's all about the information that the American people have a right to hear coming out of our - what should be respected media outlets.

It's not "his plane."  Air Force One is the people's plane.  Just like the White House is the people's house.  Media outlets are not supposed to just parrot what the government says.  They are supposed to vet the claims.  That's what they do.  Chump is a well noted liar and that's long been documented.  He can't stop lying so he's not get good press.  It doesn't work that way. 


RADDATZ:  You clearly think you had a strong case, but the temporary restraining order was granted. The judge was skeptical of the argument the department made in court filings to defend this ban on the grounds of national security.

He wrote, "For one thing, nothing in the record that predates this suit suggests that the revocation of plaintiffs' hard passes was motivated by national security concerns. Certainly, that is not what President Trump said when he announced that he was banning plaintiffs from the White House. Instead, he focused on the alleged lack of truthfulness and negativity of plaintiffs' reporting.”

The president said nothing about national security when he announced this ban, and clearly, you are very interested in the fact of what the press says and how they say it.

BLANCHE:  Well, I'm not going to get into what the judge says.  


Okay, Blanche.  The media is criticized all the time and deserves to be.  Perfection will never be achieved by the media.  For many practical reasons, it's not happening.  And we criticize it for that reason and for the hope that it will do better.  We also criticize it when it gets things wrong, when it omits things, etc, etc.  That's part of free speech as well.  We don't try to censor the media.   Joseph Kishore has an excellent critical analysis of the media that just went up at WSWS:

In the space of one week this month, two of the most prominent figures of American “democratic socialism” have appeared alongside prominent fascists in the United States.

On September 15, Senator Bernie Sanders spoke at the “Pro-Human Assembly” in Washington, an event on AI organized by the Future of Life Institute, which has relations with the far-right. Sanders spoke just prior to Steve Bannon, the fascist advisor to Donald Trump, who used the occasion to launch into a vicious anti-Chinese rant.

Six days after the assembly, on September 21, New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani, a member of the DSA, invited Donald Trump to Gracie Mansion, their third meeting since November. The two held a joint press conference on the lawn of the mayor’s residence, where Trump patted Mamdani, and the mayor presented Trump as a political ally in improving the conditions of New Yorkers.

Both events were reported prominently in the corporate media, which treated them as expressions of a supposedly “unlikely” coming together of political opposites. The various publications associated with the DSA and the organizations in and around it, however, have said nothing.

Jacobin’s picture without the caption

Jacobin, the most prominent magazine associated with the DSA, published three articles on AI in the week of the assembly but none on the assembly itself. The centerpiece, by Leigh Phillips on September 17, two days after, endorsed a bill presented by Sanders and what Phillips described as “the pro-human, carefully paced, AI development that Bernie Sanders and others have described.”

The article does not mention the Pro-Human Assembly, at which Sanders spoke, nor that the “others” with whom Sanders is aligning include Bannon, the fascist strategist of “America First”; Rep. Chip Roy of the Freedom Caucus; Sen. Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee and January 6 coup conspirator Amy Kremer. The “pro-human” coalition Jacobin endorses is, in its actual composition, a bloc between the Sanders-DSA wing of the Democratic Party and the far right, united on a program of national-security control over technology and hostility to China.

The photograph accompanying Phillips’ piece, credited to Getty Images, shows Sanders speaking at the Pro-Human Assembly on September 15—that is, at the very event the article does not name, on the stage that Bannon would take minutes later. Jacobin ran the picture but did not publish the original caption, which notes that Sanders “joined former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon” at the event.

On the Trump-Mamdani meeting, Jacobin published a September 23 piece by Liza Featherstone praising the mayor’s “Commission on Government Efficiency” and his remarks that week to a summit of mayors. Trump’s visit to Gracie Mansion two days earlier does not appear. This is the same magazine that, after the first Oval Office meeting in November, ran a series of articles hailing Mamdani’s handling of Trump as a political masterstroke.

Sunkara’s The Nation crops Trump

Jacobin withheld a caption. The Nation, whose president since 2022 is Bhaskar Sunkara, the founder and publisher of Jacobin, went one step further. On September 23, The Nation published “Zohran Mamdani Hosts the World,” by Prajwal Bhat, an account of the mayor’s meetings during the week of the UN General Assembly.

Bhat records Mamdani’s meetings with the mayors of Helsinki, Barcelona, Rome and Mexico City, with Brazil’s Lula, with the prime minister of Norway and with a delegation from Germany’s Die Linke, and concludes that these exchanges “have placed Mamdani at the center of the international left.”

Every meeting of the week is recorded except one: The meeting with Trump. 

Trump does not appear in the photograph either, though he was in it. The image The Nation ran is credited to Chip Somodevilla of Getty Images. Getty’s caption for the frame describes Trump and Mamdani holding a joint news conference after their meeting. In the original, Trump stands at Mamdani’s shoulder as the mayor speaks at the podium.

The Nation cropped the frame to Mamdani alone and captioned it as a news conference “after a meeting with Donald Trump.” The original caption from Getty reads as follows:

U.S. President Donald Trump (L) and New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani hold a joint news conference after a meeting at Gracie Mansion on September 21, 2026, in New York City. The discussions appeared to have been warm, with the two chatting informally before approaching the lectern for the conference, according to observations from published reports.

Getty’s license permits cropping of photographs “provided that the editorial integrity of the content is not compromised.” Readers may judge whether removing the president from a picture of a joint press conference meets that standard.

In 1938, when The Nation was defending the Moscow Trials and its Moscow correspondent Louis Fischer was serving as a literary agent of Stalin and Vyshinsky, Trotsky wrote of its editors: “Thus, these people, living by half-truths, that is to say, the worst form of falsehood, have become a genuine brake upon truly progressive, i.e., revolutionary thought.” Two years later, writing somewhat more sharply, he referred to the “infamous reptile breed of The Nation.”

The Stalinist regime, which The Nation was then excusing, perfected the practice of cutting inconvenient men out of photographs. Eighty-eight years later, the magazine has taken up the scissors itself, producing its “half-truths” in the form of half-photographs.

That's the opening, use the link to read in full. 

Let's wind down with this from Senator Patty Murray's office:

Murray: “Trump administration officials literally asserted birth control caused abortion, and wanted to set it on fire—seriously!”

ICYMI: Murray Leads Colleagues in Calling on RFK Jr. to Reinstate 50+ Recently Cancelled Teen Pregnancy Prevention Grants

***WATCH: Senator Murray’s remarks and the full press conference***

Washington, D.C. — Today, U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), Vice Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee and former chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee, held a press conference with Senators Mazie Hirono (D-HI) and Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV) on the reintroduction of their bicameral Affordability is Access Act. Senator Murray was also joined by Dr. Serina Floyd, Chief Medical Officer for Planned Parenthood of Metropolitan Washington, D.C., Daria Neal, Senior Director, Policy and Advocacy at the Center for Reproductive Rights, Audrey Ann Ross, Senior Manager of Communications and Policy at AccessMatters, and Dana Singiser, Co-Founder of Contraceptive Access Initiative. The legislation is also led by Congresswomen Ayanna Pressley (D-MA-07), Congressman Ami Bera (D-CA-06), and Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY-14) in the House of Representatives.

The Affordability is Access Act would require insurers to fully cover over-the-counter birth control without any fees or out-of-pocket costs, once it’s FDA-approved. The legislation also includes a new provision to require health insurance to cover every FDA-approved contraceptive drug or drug-led combination product without cost sharing unless the health plan also covers a therapeutically equivalent generic without cost sharing—this would significantly eliminate barriers that some patients face in accessing contraceptives prescribed by their provider.

This reintroduction comes as the Trump administration continues their senseless attacks on reproductive care, family planning, and contraception. Throughout the press conference, speakers discussed the administration’s moves to cancel teen pregnancy prevention grants, their attempts to decimate Title X, and their attacks on contraception—including the State Department’s extremist decision to falsely label birth control products as abortifacients.

“When it comes to birth control, the challenge we face isn’t just to stop Trump from setting up new barriers. We have to tear down the barriers that have been standing for far too long—like cost,” said Senator Murray. “We have to put forward our own vision for the future—not just reject Trump’s far-right dystopia. That’s why we are re-introducing the Affordability is Access Act. This bill would require insurance to fully cover safe, over-the-counter birth control for patients. And this year we made a big update: our bill will also make sure all other FDA-approved forms of contraception are covered for patients. No fees. No hurdles. No out-of-pocket costs. This is especially important because, as of March 2024, there is an over-the counter birth control pill that women can buy at pharmacies and grocery stores. Trump has made his vision painfully clear, he wants to take women’s rights away, he wants to set birth control on fire. Well, this bill is our vision as Democrats. We want to protect women’s rights. And we want to protect your birth control.”

“As the Trump regime continues to attack reproductive freedom, fighting for contraception access has never been more important,” said Senator Hirono. “FDA approval of over-the-counter birth control is a major step forward, but approval alone does not guarantee access. By requiring insurance companies to cover over-the-counter contraception at no cost and without a prescription, this legislation will help to ensure women nationwide have the power to control their bodies and their lives.”

“Congress must pass the Affordability is Access Act to expand Americans’ reproductive freedoms even as this Administration tries to shrink them,” said Senator Cortez Masto. “Birth control has helped thousands of Nevadans and millions of Americans live healthy lives. It’s past time we made sure every woman who wants it has an affordable over-the-counter option they can buy.”

“While Trump and his Republican co-conspirators attack our bodily autonomy and make life less affordable, we’re fighting hard to protect reproductive freedom, lower costs, and ensure contraceptives are affordable nationwide,” said Rep. Pressley. “Our bill would make over-the-counter birth control accessible to all who need it, without the burden of prescriptions or out-of-pocket costs. Reproductive justice means protecting and expanding reproductive healthcare, and I’m proud to partner with Senators Murray, Cortez Masto, and Hirono, alongside Reps. Bera and Ocasio-Cortez, and our colleagues to make that a reality for all.”

“I am proud to reintroduce the Affordability is Access Act alongside Representative Ayanna Pressley and Senator Patty Murray, which will make birth control widely accessible and affordable without a prescription,” said Rep Ocasio-Cortez. “As this administration continues to attack bodily autonomy, we will continue to fight to ensure that people everywhere have access to reproductive care.”

“Birth control is essential healthcare that everyone, no matter their insurance or income, should be able to get when they need it,” said Alexis McGill Johnson, president and CEO, Planned Parenthood Federation of America. “This act is a crucial first step in removing cost barriers and expanding access to contraception. As anti-reproductive health lawmakers continue to do everything in their power to restrict access to care, we’re grateful to Sen. Murray for reintroducing this bill.”

“Contraception is a fundamental part of reproductive health care and autonomy— it gives people the power to shape their own futures,” said Daria Neal, Senior Director of Policy and Advocacy at the Center for Reproductive Rights. “Everyone who needs contraception should be able to access and afford it. Yet the Trump Administration has repeatedly put that access at risk, from subverting the federal family planning program and ending teen pregnancy prevention grants, to letting millions of dollars in taxpayer-funded contraceptives go to waste overseas. We’re grateful to Senator Murray and her colleagues for standing up for reproductive rights and supporting this critically important legislation.”

“With the sudden termination of AccessMatters’ teen pregnancy prevention initiative, over 2,500 adolescents in Philadelphia immediately lost access to everything this program provided over the last three years – including evidence-based education programming, parent workshops, connections to local healthcare providers, assistance setting up medical appointments and accessing contraceptives, and leadership opportunities for the Youth Advisory Board,” said Audrey Ann Ross, Senior Manager of Communications and Policy at AccessMatters. “This loss of access coupled with the shifts in Title X program priorities further underscore the need for policies that support access to contraceptives and sexual and reproductive health care and information. We urge Congress to pass policies like the Affordability in Access Act and to also demand that HHS immediately restore this funding so that adolescents nationwide can continue benefitting from these programs.”

Under the Affordable Care Act, all private health insurance plans are required to fully cover — without copays or out-of-pocket costs — prescribed U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved, granted, or cleared methods of contraception. The Affordability is Access Act would change this to apply to over-the-counter birth control that women can get without a prescription. The Affordability is Access Act would also maintain the FDA’s sole authority to determine the safety and efficacy of drugs and make them available over the counter without a prescription, and ensure retailers provide contraception without a prescription. The legislation states that any retailer that stocks contraception that the FDA has approved, granted, or cleared without a prescription may not interfere with a consumer’s access to or purchase of such contraception.

The Senate bill is co-sponsored by Senators Murray (D-WA), Cortez Masto (D-NV), Hirono (D-HI), Baldwin (D-WI), Bennet (D-CO), Blumenthal (D-CT), Booker (D-NJ), Cantwell (D-WA), Duckworth (D-IL), Fetterman (D-PA), Gallego (D-AZ), Gillibrand (D-NY), Hassan (D-NH), Heinrich (D-NM), Hickenlooper (D-CO), Kaine (D-VA), Klobuchar (D-MN), Markey (D-MA), Merkley (D-OR), Padilla (D-CA), Reed (D-RI), Rosen (D-NV), Sanders (D-VT), Schatz (D-HI), Schiff (D-CA), Shaheen (D-NH), Smith (D-MN), Van Hollen (D-MD), Warner (D-VA), Warren (D-MA), Whitehouse (D-RI), and Wyden (D-OR).

The bill is endorsed by: Contraceptive Access Initiative (CAI), National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association (NFPRHA), American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Upstream USA, Reproductive Health Access Project, Physicians for Reproductive Health, National Partnership for Women & Families, Healthy Teen Network, Jacobs Institute of Women’s Health, Reproductive Freedom for All, Power to Decide, Planned Parenthood Federation of America, The Center for Biological Diversity, National Council of Jewish Women, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, National Women’s Law Center Action Fund, National Latina Institute for Reproductive Justice, Advocates for Youth, In Our Own Voice: National Black Women’s Reproductive Justice Agenda, AIDS United, National Asian Pacific American Women’s Forum, National Network of Abortion Funds, Center for Reproductive Rights, National Organization for Women (NOW), Religious Community for Reproductive Choice, The Guttmacher Institute, Population Connection Action Fund, American College of Nurse Mid-Wives, and Ibis Reproductive Health.

Senator Murray is a longtime leader in the fight to protect and expand access to reproductive health care and abortion rights, and she has led Congressional efforts to fight back after the Supreme Court’s disastrous decision overturning Roe v. Wade. Murray has introduced more than a dozen pieces of legislation to protect reproductive rights from further attacks, protect providers, and help ensure women get the care they need; Murray has led efforts to push for passage of these bills on the Senate floor multiple times over the last four years.

Over the course of her career, Senator Murray has always fought to ensure widespread access to affordable birth control. In the aftermath of the Dobbs leak, Senator Murray introduced and sought unanimous consent to pass the Right to Contraception Act to protect every American’s right to use contraception—Republicans blocked the bill. Senator Murray pushed to ensure birth control was covered under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), led the fight against the Supreme Court’s Hobby Lobby ruling, and has persistently pressed the administration to enforce the ACA’s coverage for contraceptive services since then. Senator Murray has long held that FDA must make its decisions based on sound science and public health needs, not politics—and she is widely credited with leading the fight to make Plan B  available over the counter.

Read the full text of the Affordability is Access Act HERE.

A transcript of Senator Murray’s remarks as delivered are below:


“Two years ago—the Biden Administration set forward a proposed rule to strengthen requirements that insurance cover birth control. Not even one year later—Trump administration officials literally asserted birth control caused abortion, and wanted to set it on fire—seriously! 

“I mean it does not get clearer than that. While Democrats have always fought to expand access to birth control, the Trump Administration has put up barrier after barrier. Make no mistake—Trump has given far right radicals the green light to go after birth control in just about any way they can think of.

“Their record is plain as day. Trump took the Title X family planning program—and is twisting it into pretzels trying to redirect funds away from organizations that help people get birth control. He took the Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program canceled grants, and is now trying to distort the very purpose of that program too.

“And the attacks on reproductive rights don’t stop at family planning and contraception. At the FDA Trump fired his own Commissioner for not moving fast enough to throw out the science and rip medication abortion away from patients.

“At the EPA Trump has them checking drinking water for traces of medication abortion.

“And don’t forget the birth control example I led with, at Trump’s State Department they are spending thousands of dollars each month to withhold contraceptives meant for foreign aid and they incorrectly claimed that these birth control supplies cause ‘abortion.’

“And yet some Republicans still have the gall to act like they have no idea why we say birth control is under attack! Just like how they had no idea abortion was under attack—right up until they ripped it away.

“Let’s please not pretend that the administration which is weaponizing environmental laws to attack medication abortion and has falsely labeled contraception as abortion is not coming for birth control.

“Well Democrats are not standing by. We have been fighting back against each and every one of these attacks on birth control.

“But more than fighting back—we are going to keep pushing forward.


“Because when it comes to birth control, the challenge we face isn’t just to stop Trump from setting up new barriers—we have to tear down the barriers that have been standing in the way for far too long, like the cost. We have to put forward our own vision for the future—not just reject Trump’s far-right dystopia.


“That’s why we are re-introducing the Affordability is Access Act. This bill would require insurance to fully cover safe, over-the-counter birth control for patients.

“And this year we made a big update: our bill will also make sure all other FDA-approved forms of contraception are covered for patients. No fees. No hurdles. No out-of-pocket costs.

“This is especially important because, as of March 2024, there is an over-the-counter birth control pill that women can buy at pharmacies and grocery stores!

“Trump has made his vision painfully clear: He wants to take away women’s rights. He wants to set birth control on fire.


“Well this bill is our vision as Democrats: We want to protect women’s rights and we want to protect your birth control.”

###




The following sites updated:


Saturday, September 26, 2026

Chump is on the ropes

Our Convicted Felon Donald Chump cannot stop his corruption.  Angel Saunders (PEOPLE) reports:

Donald Trump has released a new ad featuring a song called “Love Me” ahead of the midterm elections.

Last week, the White House released an ad to its official YouTube channel titled “America Will Never Be a Communist Country.” 

“Together, we will defeat communism, socialism and marxism in America once and for all,” Trump says in a voiceover in the video, which included a compilation of photos and video clips of the president from his time in the White House. 

It ends with a close-up of Trump, 80, with a voiceover of the president stating, “It will never be a communist country.”

JMSN’s “Love Me” plays throughout the clip.

JMSN was not consulted about the use of his song, states he would have said no, and notes he is looking for an attorney.  In addition Angel Saunders notes:

After journalist Yashar Ali noted on X that the “Love Me” ad “looks and sounds like a political spot and includes a disclaimer stating that it is paid for by the U.S. government,” Rep. Jamie Raskin of Maryland also slammed the message.

“This may be felony criminal theft and conversion of government property for political campaign purposes,” Raskin, 63, wrote, noting the Hatch Act, a 1939 federal law that limits the political campaigning of the executive branch of the government.

Mr. Chump is so corrupt.  Over at THE NEW REPUBIC, Matt Ford notes:

President Donald Trump appears to think that the phrase “national security” is a get-out-of-court-free card whenever he wants to do (or get away with) something. Thanks to the Supreme Court, one can hardly blame him for drawing this conclusion.

Last month, the justices allowed his illegal White House ballroom project to move forward after a lower court had blocked it. Part of the conservative majority’s reasoning was that the executive branch had declared that the project was necessary on national-security grounds, citing sworn statements from a variety of top government officials about the importance of a bunker being built under the ballroom.

Trump and his aides appear to have taken that lesson—that invoking “national security” is a good way to get what you want—to heart. Earlier this week, he announced that another planned project in the nation’s capital would get a militarized makeover. Trump has long sought to build a grandiose and gaudy triumphal arch on a roundabout between the Lincoln Memorial and Arlington National Cemetery.

To smooth the way, Trump proclaimed last weekend that the 250-foot arch would also be a “top grade military complex” with the ability to house and store “large numbers of drones, plus snipers,” as well as “large quantities of sniper ammunition.” Trump bragged that ”there will be no facility like this anywhere in the world,” likely because it doesn’t make any sense. The president also insisted that the change came “at the strong request of the United States Military, and for National Security purposes.”


Mr. Chump's popularity is gone, long gone. William Vaillancourt (THE DAILY BEAST) notes:

Donald Trump seems to be playing defense with his choice of midterm campaign stops in the coming weeks. He’ll soon travel to states where Republicans are suddenly having to defend Senate seats.

Next month, the 80-year-old president will travel to four states where Republicans are supposed to be safe but are suddenly facing competitive Senate races: Texas, Alaska, Iowa, and Florida.

In Texas, where a Democrat hasn’t won a statewide office in over three decades, James Talarico leads Trump-endorsed Attorney General Ken Paxton, 50 percent to 44 percent, according to a Marist poll released this week.

In Alaska, Democrat Mary Peltola leads incumbent Dan Sullivan by four and five points, according to two polls released two weeks ago.

Iowa Senate candidate Josh Turek, who has Barack Obama’s coveted endorsement, leads Ashley Hinson by eight points in a Marist poll conducted last week.

What Mr. Vaillancourt forgets is that if Mr. Chump goes to Texas in October?  He will be returning there.  He just spent days there for his convention.  And I really do not see how his returning there one month later is going to provide a bump in polling -- not for him, not for Republicans running in the state. 

This is C.I.'s "The Snapshot" for today:


Friday, September 25, 2026.  Chump's swirling in the toilet along with his low approval rating, Bank of America warns more inflation for groceries may be coming in the next six months, Markwayne Mullin needs to get his department in order, and much more. 




As Ben (MEIDASTOUCH NEWS) notes Chump's poll numbers are, like him, in the toilet.



Food-at-home prices were unchanged in August from July but remained 2.2% higher than a year earlier, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. But:

Overall food prices increased 2.7%. 
Electricity prices were up 3.8%
Utility-piped natural gas rose 4.4%
Gasoline climbed 27.4% from a year earlier.
Those pressures are showing up in consumer behavior.

Seventy-five percent of Americans surveyed by Algolia said they were stressed about their grocery bills, up from 73% a year earlier.

Forty-two percent said they had switched to private-label products to save money, while 36% replaced their favorite brands with cheaper alternatives. 

Another 41% cut back on premium meat or seafood, and 39% bought fewer nonessential foods such as snacks and treats.

Now, shoppers may have another reason to watch supermarket prices closely.

Bank of America estimates that food-at-home inflation could accelerate to between 7% and 8% over the next six months as higher fuel, wage, and commodity costs work their way through the food supply chain.

That would represent a sharp increase from today’s 2.2% rate.

Repeating: Bank of America estimates that food-at-home inflation could accelerate to between 7% and 8% over the next six months.  And Chump famously loved "I love inflation" back on -- Americans?  They really don't love inflation.  And as it continues, they hate it.  As there's a possibility that it could increase even more over the next six months?  Chump will go down as the worst president ever and the most hated. 
 
He brought it all on himself.  He was handed a recovering economy.  In his first four year term, Chump presided over 8% inflation.  Then came the pandemic and Joe Biden was elected.  Joe got the economy under control.  We were the envy of the world as 2024 drew to a close for our economic recovery.  Then Chump came in with his tariffs.  Tariffs are a tax.  A tax on the one purchasing.  Chump wanted to lie about this.  It's a basic, it's a fundamental.  Lawrence O'Donnell and Stephanie Ruhle explained this over and over on what is now MS NOW ahead of the election and after.  But Chump's an idiot.  The tariffs immediately screwed up the economy.  His war on immigrants screwed up the economy as well. Some don't understand that.  Eateries targeted for their customer base are impacted.  Any place that deals in customer service was impacted because some employees did not want to go to work because it wasn't safe for them.  The housing industry? Construction sites depend upon workers.  Texas isn't the only state that workers weren't showing in because they were worried they'd be hauled off.  Immigrants make up as much as 35% of housing construction workers in the US.  Chump's programs have resulted in increases in the prices of homes.  In addition, his war on immigrants has given the US a black eye on the global stage and people aren't coming to the US as part of the tourism industry in the numbers that they were before Chump got back in office.  Las Vegas, for example, saw a 7.5% drop in tourism.  Tourism is airlines, it's rent a cars, it's restaurants, it's hotels and motels, it's gift shops.  It is huge and some cities economies depend a great deal upon tourism -- foreign travelers coming to the US.  Chump's war on immigrants is ugly and vile and people don't want to deal with it so they're choosing to go places other than the US.  And then there's the third big factor in Chump's destruction of the economy: His war of choice with Iran.   


Chump will be remembered for destroying this economy.  

As a result of all of this, Chump's polling is in the toilet.  And now Congressional Republicans running for re-election are very scared.  






We don’t know what’s going to happen in the midterms. But we know for a fact that today you can watch the hilarity of the collapse of so many of Trump’s plans and cheap, or corrupt, midterms gambits. Even the inside D.C. sheets can sense the energy. Here’s a piece — Trump officials weigh rolling back beef import plan as GOP midterm panic spreads. A picture of an angst-ridden, wayward Trump adorns the article. This is the plan Trump rolled out last month to institute a 90-day import bonanza of foreign beef that was apparently some kind of sweetheart deal with a Brazilian beef lord named Joesley Batista. The Wall Street Journal has a good story on that part of the tale. Here’s a New York Times op-ed questioning the safety of what was first called Trump’s mystery meat. In any case, the point was to engineer an extremely short-lived drop in the price of hamburgers. But it drove beef producers — an extremely GOP constituency — crazy since, of course, the whole point was to lower the price of the product ahead of the midterms. Now they’re getting so desperate at the White House they’re apparently considering scrapping the whole plan, with, I guess, a sort of mass deportation of beef.
[. . .]
Meanwhile, you’ve got Trump making headlines about compiling new lists of Washington buildings and institutions to rename after himself, including Ford’s Theater, which may have a more ambiguous meaning than he realizes. At a basic level he can’t help broadcasting what people may not care about that much in itself — his silly schlock building projects and renaming efforts — but which tells them at high volume that doing the actual job of president or caring about top public concerns is the furthest thing from his mind.

Tom Boggioni (RAW STORY) notes a post-midterm phase that would be highly uncomfortable for Chump:

If Republicans suffer massive losses in the midterms, which are just six weeks away, Donald Trump may find himself outside his party looking in.

According to former Gov. Chris Christie (R-NJ), GOP lawmakers are getting tired of election losses during his second term and a midterm blow-out could be the last straw.
The former New Jersey governor told Politico Playbook that Trump-skeptical Republicans are already looking past Nov. 3. Calling in from New Hampshire, Christie warned that "for the first time in 15 years, we could be in a position to lose a majority of the governorships" — a stark reversal from when he chaired the Republican Governors Association and the party controlled 31 of 50 statehouses.
"I think there's a scenario where Republicans wake up in the week or two after Election Day and say, 'We're just tired of losing,'" Christie told Playbook.

This as Benjamin S. Weiss (HUFFINGTON POST) reports on another poll finding Chump has run off young male voters:

Republicans have all but erased their gains among young men from the 2024 election, according to a new poll released by a GOP-aligned firm.

The data, published by Cygnal and unveiled at the Symposium on Young American Men in Washington, showed Democratic candidates with a commanding lead over Republicans among young men ages 18-30 who are highly likely to vote in the midterm elections.

“Not great news for Republicans,” Cygnal principal and pollster Alex Tarascio said during the event.

According to the Cygnal survey of 800 young men, respondents who said they were determined to vote in the midterms preferred Democratic candidates around 57% of the time — a striking 17-point lead over Republicans. Notably, that margin reversed among men surveyed who said they were unlikely to turn out in November, with roughly 39% of respondents saying they’d back a Republican candidate.


Dan Froomkin (SALON) offers some advice for what could happen after the midterms:

Imagine, instead, a Democratic leadership with a to-do list in one hand — starting with a compelling affordability agenda — and a how-to list in the other hand, something like this:

No more cowering from veto threats. Democrats should dare Trump to veto popular legislation and make him own the consequences if he does.
Demand major concessions from Trump in return for passing a new debt limit and a defense spending bill, and shut down the government if necessary.
Drive a wedge between Republican legislators and their increasingly unpopular and irrational leader.
No more protecting “centrist” Democrats from tough votes.
Tell the lobbyists to take a hike.
Impeach Office of Management and Budget director Russell Vought for violating congressional spending directives.
Order the Capitol Police to arrest and jail administration officials if they refuse to honor congressional subpoenas.

Democrats in leadership and on the campaign trail talk a lot about their lofty legislative goals. But some of those goals are unattainable as long as Trump has the veto — and even more so if Republicans keep the Senate. Democrats need to be thinking and talking about what they can practically achieve — and how. And they need to have a battle plan so they can hit the ground running in January.
I raised questions about how they could do that in a Sept. 2 op-ed for MS NOW. As part of my hunt for answers, I turned to some wise left-leaning Washington veterans for their thoughts.

“This is going to be really tricky business,” Norman Ornstein, the longtime congressional analyst, told me.

“It would require a wholesale change in the DNA of House and Senate Democrats,” said Jim Manley, a political strategist who spent more than 20 years working in the Senate, including six years as spokesman for then-Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.

Triumphant congressional Democrats “are going to be feeling feisty, they’re going to feel vindicated, and they’re going to feel like fighting like hell,” said Robert Kuttner, who co-founded the Economic Policy Institute and the American Prospect.

“If they aren’t assertive,” Ornstein warned, “they may not hold their majority for very long.” 

Each of these experts, with decades of experience between them, all agreed that whether Democrats control one of both chambers, they need to pass lots of popular bills and make it painful for Trump and Republicans to oppose them. If the legislation becomes law, it’s a huge victory. If it’s blocked, the public will know who to blame. 




Turning to immigration, Richard Luscombe (GUARDIAN) reports that Sunday saw another death:

Leading Democrats and immigration advocates in Michigan are demanding transparency from federal authorities after a man died in a fiery car crash as he attempted to avoid agents from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

Mario David Coronado Juarez, a Guatemalan national, was killed on Sunday in Grand Rapids when his vehicle struck a tree at high speed and burst into flames shortly after the ICE officers tried to conduct a traffic stop.

Gretchen Whitmer, the Democratic Michigan governor, said she had ordered a review of the Grand Rapids incident.

Joseph Trigg, chief of the Grand Rapids police department, asked the Michigan state police (MSP) to join the investigation, noting in a statement that his own traffic detectives had been “limited in their ability” to obtain information from federal agencies.

That death took place Sunday -- the same day that saw ICE in Austin shoot Wilber Rafael GarcĂ©s PĂ©rez and that left a man in Evanston, Illinois -- a US citizen -- battered and laying in the street.  On the attack in Evanston, Nicolai Haugsted (DAGENS) reports:

Video from the confrontation shows the man on the ground repeatedly insisting that he is an American citizen before the agents eventually release him and drive away. Local police are investigating.
[. . .]
“I’m a f—ing US citizen,” the man can be heard shouting while being restrained.

Moments later, the agents release him. Video then shows them getting into their vehicles and leaving while the man remains face down on the street and bystanders gather around him.

Witness Miguel Angel Olivares told NBC Chicago that the amount of force immediately concerned him.

“They were using very rough force on him, and it looked like they really did hurt him. I did want to go over there and tell them to leave him alone, but at the same time, me being Hispanic, I was kind scared that they don’t know I’m a U.S. citizen,” Olivares said.
[. . .]

Officers found the man on the ground with several people helping him and requested an ambulance after he complained of injuries to his head, neck and teeth.

Police later visited him at a local hospital and photographed his injuries as part of their investigation.

[. . .]

John Sandweg, who served as acting director of ICE and previously held senior positions at DHS during the Obama administration, told CNN that unanswered questions remain about exactly why agents approached the encounter so aggressively.

“Who was the individual they were targeting? Who was the guy they mistook here? Is this someone with a violent criminal history? Why did we have such an aggressive response from the officers?” Sandweg said.

Regardless of those answers, Sandweg argued that the footage raised broader concerns about the use of force.

“This is part of what we’ve seen across the board, where we’ve seen this erosion of accountability, where there’s a rush to defend these agents,” he said.

“And again, case after case after case where we’ve seen a very aggressive tone taken by the officers. It doesn’t always appear justified.”

A US citizen that ICE mistakes -- their mistake -- for someone they're supposed to be rounding up is attacked by ICE and then ICE leaves.  The man's laying in the street.  And ICE leaves.  Even though they've attacked him.  They don't call for medical assistance.  They just run off like the cowards that they truly are.  

The Secretary of Homeland Security Markwayne Mullin declared yesterday, "DHS is calling on these sanctuary politicians to stop attacking federal law enforcement, stop putting the needs of illegal aliens ahead of the safety of American citizens, and to start working with us to make America safe again." When will Markwayne call on ICE to stop attacking US citizens?  They left one bloodied in Evensville, laying in the street, after they attacked him.  In fact, one of the ICE agents still had blood on his fist when local police caught up with him.  

ICE is not working to make America safe again.  It is working to destroy and harm.  That's the reality that Markwayne doesn't want to face.  ICE is the problem.  And if you can't see that when they're terrorizing US citizens, you're not going to see it when they're terrorizing immigrants.  ICE has shot and killed US citizens -- Renee Nicole Gold and Alex Pretti.  That's not the distant past.  That's the start of this calendar year. 

Chump has othered the immigrant and that's all it takes for some Americans to not care about immigrants.  But even if you set aside that awful treatment, you are still left with ICE attacking and killing -- terror tactics -- US citizens.  Markwayne would be more effective as the Secretary of Homeland Security if he sought punishment for ICE agents whose actions require it.  And there is talk of a class action suit against Homeland Security for their failure to maintain hiring standards and for putting agents out on the streets -- armed -- when they haven't even done background checks on them.  Markwayne's got a lot of problems but sanctuary cities aren't one of them. 


In other news, a Republican senator scooches away from Chump.  Billal Rahman (NEWSWEEK) reports:

Republican Senator Roger Marshall has voiced concerns with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations in southwest Kansas, calling on federal agents to coordinate more closely with local law enforcement as immigration raids unfold across the region.

“When ICE operates in Kansas, it needs to coordinate with our local law enforcement. Our sheriffs and police know these communities better than anyone, and working together keeps officers and residents safe,” Marshall wrote in a post on X.

“I’m closely following what’s happening in SW Kansas and have been in direct contact with Secretary Mullin and local law enforcement as ICE executes warrants in order to keep Kansans safe.”
0
It comes after local officials reported increased ICE activity in communities including Dodge City, Garden City and Liberal.

Officials in those cities said they were not notified in advance of the federal enforcement operations and learned of them only after agents became visible in their communities. In a joint statement, the cities said leaders “understand the concern and uncertainty this situation has created within our communities,” which “are built on trust, communication, and transparency.”

As the midterms approach, the senator hurries to put some distance between himself and Chump.  It also comes as ICE is seen wasting huge amounts of tax dollars.  Ryan J. Foley (INDEPENDENT) reports: 

 
ICE and other federal agencies have squandered tens of millions of dollars pursuing ill-conceived plans to rapidly expand detention capacity, with ongoing mismanagement likely to drive costs even higher, congressional investigators warned on Thursday.

A report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office documented costly problems across several initiatives launched after President Donald Trump returned to office in January 2025 and ordered the mass arrest and deportation of people who are in the country illegally.

Key examples of misspending include nearly $3 million spent to erect tents at Guantanamo Bay that were never used, $20 million to maintain purchased warehouses that are now being sold without ever housing a detainee, and excessive rates paid to hold detainees at a deficient and now-closed Florida lockup.


Here's another thing Markwayne can add to his to-do list: Come up with a budget plan.  Foley notes Congress has given ICE  "an unprecedented $45 billion to expand detention capacity last year as part of the Trump-backed One Big Beautiful Bill, but the agency still lacks a comprehensive strategic plan for how to spend it wisely, the report warned."   

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has some work to do as well.  A lot.  And to his long list that he's ignoring, he can add emotional well being of the troops.  Filip Timotija (THE HILL) reports: 

Acting Navy Secretary Hung Cao told a Senate Democrat this week that eight sailors assigned to the USS Abraham Lincoln carrier strike group attempted suicide during a lengthy deployment that included military operations against Iran. 

Cao disclosed the figure, which includes crew on the USS Abraham Lincoln and sailors from its carrier air wing, strike group and destroyer squadron staff, in a four-page letter to Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), which was obtained by The Hill on Wednesday. 

A carrier strike group is a formation typically made up of an aircraft carrier, cruiser, destroyers or frigates and a carrier wing with dozens of aircraft. Sometimes the groups can include submarines. 



Eight sailors attempted suicide?  While serving.  That means there's a problem.  The USS ABRAHAM LINCOLN was a set of its own problems -- a tour that lasted way too long, lack of water and other things on the ship, food rationing, etc.  Hegseth needs to address all of those issues -- especially since reports first came out in April about what was going on onboard the USS ABRAHAM LINCOLN and Hegseth dismissed those reports as false back in April.  But he also needs to so some sort of study to determine whether these eight attempts -- and I'm sure many more considered suicide onboard the vessel -- all stem from the failures to adequately stock the ship and the excessive time at sea?  There may be other issues and a study could determine that.  I know Hegseth won't implement one because he doesn't care about the well being of the troops.  







As Ben (MEIDASTOUCH NEWS) notes in the video above, early this morning the court released a verdict.  Erik Wemple (NEW YORK TIMES) explains:

A federal judge on Thursday said that President Trump’s order barring CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House was likely unconstitutional and ordered the administration to restore access to the three news outlets.

Judge Timothy J. Kelly of the U.S. District Court in Washington granted a 14-day restraining order and told the White House to “immediately return, reinstate, and restore” the press credentials held by employees of the three outlets.

The news organizations were likely to succeed in their claim that the White House had violated their constitutional due process rights by revoking their press credentials without advance notice or an opportunity to respond, Judge Kelly wrote in the order issued in the early hours of Thursday.

He also rejected, for now, the administration’s argument that revoking the outlets’ press credentials was necessary to protect national security.



In the ruling issued early Thursday, Kelly found the revocation of reporters’ press badges was done without “constitutionally adequate due process.”

The ruling - which comes just hours before Trump is set to welcome Chinese leader Xi Jinping - means journalists should now be able to return to work at the White House complex.     Some CNN staff, however, were unable to gain access to the White House early Thursday morning. CNN reporter Betsy Klein and a photojournalist were denied access to the White House grounds in the 6:00 a.m. hour. There was no reason provided for the refusal and CNN will continue to try to gain access as regular business hours start.

One CNN producer was able to enter the White House using their pass after 6:00 a.m. It was not immediately clear why the person had been able to access the building.     

In a normal world, that would be it.  The judge ruled.  The White House complies.  But, no, not in Chump world.  So yesterday started with a temporary ruling saying MS NOW, POLITIO and CNN could not be barred from the White House.  That ruling came down shortly after midnight.  Thursday morning reporters from the three outlets were still struggling to get in.  Then they were finally allowed in and by that evening there was another hiccup.


CNN and MS NOW said their journalists were denied access to Chinese President Xi Jinping's state dinner arrival on Thursday amid the ongoing dispute between the Trump administration and three news organizations.

CNN reported that the White House approved credentials for an audio technician and photojournalist to cover President Xi's arrival, but excluded a reporter and producer. MS NOW said White House reporter Laura BarrĂ³n-LĂ³pez was turned away from the arrival ceremony. The organization said it had requested credentials for the event, but had not received a response.

According to the Associated Press, the four other broadcast networks that are part of the so-called "video pool" also declined to air coverage of President Xi's arrival in a show of support for CNN, meaning there was no live broadcast by a major U.S. network.


On the banning itself, NPR's ALL THINGS CONSIDERED addressed that yesterday:


SCOTT DETROW, HOST:

Now, part of the Trump administration's argument for banning these new outlets is that their coverage posed a threat to national security. In a letter to Politico, the White House pointed to a story Politico published in June about the U.S. nearing a deal to end the war in Iran. It specifically raised concerns about a quote from an anonymous official, but it turns out the source was reportedly Vice President JD Vance. Oliver Darcy is a media reporter who first broke the story last night. He's the founder of Status, an outlet that covers the media. Welcome.

OLIVER DARCY: Hey. Thanks for having me.

DETROW: So the interesting thing here is the details are not that the vice president was, you know, anonymously tipping off reporters on a burner phone, but I think that makes what happened here even more glaring. Walk us through what happened with the initial reports and Vance's involvement.

DARCY: Yes, this was a sanctioned briefing by the White House. So the White House often holds what are called background briefings. And basically, it means that they'll make a senior official in the administration available to a large group of reporters who listen on a call and they can report what the official says. They're just told that they can only refer to this person anonymously by usually a, you know, description like a senior administration official, as was the case with this June 2026 report that Politico published. What's - you know, this is very common. Republicans and Democrats have been doing this for a long time. It's very common in Washington to be participating in these background briefings.

What's uncommon is a White House, obviously, that attacks and demonizes the press for using anonymous sourcing while often providing that anonymous sourcing in sanctioned calls like the one that JD Vance participated in about the Iran war.

DETROW: Right.

DARCY: And obviously, what's even more abnormal here is then accusing that outlet of endangering national security or spreading falsehoods for participating in a call they were invited to by the White House and following the ground rules of anonymously identifying the official versus just saying JD Vance said this on a call.

DETROW: Right, because even though the quotes are anonymous, this is about as sanctioned as information from a White House can get - these phone calls, these background briefings, like the one in question here. How are news outlets responding to this, the way that the White House has been portraying this, again, official White House call?

DARCY: I mean, I think - I mean, most news outlets, to be clear, actually can't even respond to this because they were part of this background briefing call, which kind of makes this interesting. You haven't seen this broadly reported because most outlets - CNN, the New York Times, the Washington Post - they agreed to the rules of this call, which meant that they cannot identify JD Vance as the source of the information. They all published stories about what was said on this background briefing call.

So actually, you're seeing kind of a muted response from a lot of other outlets, which could definitely - they definitely know that JD Vance is the source. They were on this call. We were not on the call, which is why we can identify him, because we never agreed to these rules.

I think in the journalism community, it looks really bad for JD Vance. I mean, this is very embarrassing for the White House. They invited Politico to this call. Politico followed all the rules and reported what JD Vance told reporters on this call. And then the White House, a couple months later, uses that against Politico and accuses them of violating national security or endangering national security. I've been reporting on media for over a decade. I have never seen anything like this. I've always thought it was strange the White House, under Trump, who bashes anonymous sources, holds these background briefing calls, where he - where they require people to anonymously identify officials. I've always thought that was weird and reporters should push back.


 Let's wind down with this from Senator Elizabeth Warren's office:


Senators continue to express “concerns about the judgment of the DOJ, and the extent to which the DOJ is willing and able to prosecute white collar criminals under President Trump.”

Text of Letter (PDF)

Washington, D.C. — Today, U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) pressed Attorney General Todd Blanche for answers following new revelations that came to light in the criminal case against billionaire Gautam Adani. In particular, new court filings confirmed that after Adani hired President Trump’s personal lawyer, Mr. Adani attorneys conveyed an offer to invest $10 billion in the United States “as part of any resolution of” his criminal matter, after which Adani’s criminal charges were dismissed.  

Senators Warren and Blumenthal initially opened an investigation of this matter in June 2026.

As reported, the new court filings acknowledge… that [Adani] had offered to invest $10 billion in the United States as part of the resolution of his criminal case.”

“The audacity of this statement is astounding,” the senators wrote. “This appears to be an offer of a quid-pro-quo for individual criminal immunity.”

The chain of events was so outside the norm that the overseeing federal judge went out of his way in his order to remark that the DOJ’s decision-making process appeared to be “highly unusual” and that the “irregularities in the decision to dismiss the indictment are concerning.”

New information also indicates that another of the President’s personal lawyers and advisors, Boris Epshteyn, became involved in the case, as well. Mr. Epshteyn reportedly “operat[es] as a connector for clients with business before the Trump Administration” where “[h]e offer[s] to help potential clients solve issues before the administration in exchange for a monthly fee of as much as six figures.”

Given that the new public reports and documents filed with the court provide even more questions about what happened, Senators Warren and Blumenthal are pushing the DOJ to provide the full truth of what happened.

Senator Warren has led the fight to root out corruption and hold the Trump administration accountable:

  • In September 2026, Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), a member of the Senate Finance Committee, pressed James Gadwood, nominee to be Chief Counsel for the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), to make a series of ethics commitments ahead of his September 15 hearing before the Senate Finance Committee. 
  • In August 2026, following a social media post from Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (RFK Jr.), Senator Elizabeth Warren wrote to RFK Jr. asking whether he has changed his ethics agreement, and if so, how and when any changes were made. The letter builds on an investigation into whether RFK Jr.’s family may be financially benefitting from a $50 million anti-vaccine settlement he could have influenced as HHS Secretary.
  • In August 2026, Senator Elizabeth Warren pressed President Donald Trump on his recent financial disclosures, which reveal 3,555 individual stock trades worth up to half a billion dollars in just the first three months of 2026 and more than 14,000 stock trades worth up to $1.06 billion during Trump’s first year in office. 
  • In August 2026, Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) pressed Antwerp World Diamond Centre (AWDC) and David Gotlib Luxury Cufflinks over the decision to gift President Trump an 18-karat gold, diamond-encrusted ring shortly before the Trump administration announced tariff exemptions on European diamonds. 
  • In June 2026, Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) pressed Dr. Erich Hernandez-Baquero, a current Raytheon executive nominated for Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Space Acquisition and Integration, to make a series of ethics commitments, including recusing himself for four years from all matters related to his former employer, committing to not work for a defense contractor for four years after leaving government service, and commit to not lobby the Department of Defense (DoD) for at least four years after leaving his new role.
  • In June 2026, Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs; Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Ranking Member of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations; Gary Peters (D-Mich.), Ranking Member of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs; Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary; and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Finance, wrote to the Republican Chairs of their respective Committees urging immediate hearings on the Trump family’s cryptocurrency firm and its ties to a foreign government that subsequently received advanced U.S. AI chips and a major arms deal.
  • In June 2026, Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) and Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), along with Representatives Jason Crow (D-Colo.) and Mike Levin (D-Calif.), pressed White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles following reports that the White House interfered to deliver a lucrative Department of Defense (DoD) contract to Vulcan Elements, a key Trump Jr.-linked company.
  • In May 2026, Senator Elizabeth Warren pressed the Acting Director-Designate for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), David Venturella, on his decades-long revolving door career between ICE and the private prison industry and his reported use of Department of Homeland Security (DHS) personnel and resources for personal or political favors.
  • In May 2026, Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Rick Scott (R-Fla.) introduced the Banning Lobbying And Safeguarding Trust (BLAST) Act, a bipartisan bill to impose a lifetime ban on lobbying by former members of Congress.
  • In February 2026, Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Andy Kim (D-N.J.), along with Representatives Pat Ryan (D-N.Y.) and Deborah Ross (D-N.C.) pressed the Inspectors General (IGs) of 16 key agencies to open investigations into senior Trump officials who were recently lobbyists or “shadow lobbyists” and may be using their roles to benefit their former employers and clients.
  • In January 2026, Senators Warren (D-Mass.), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), and Andy Kim (D-N.J.) pressed Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth on potential conflicts of interest surrounding the awarding of multiple lucrative Department of Defense (DoD) contracts and loans to companies associated with President Donald Trump’s son, Donald Trump Jr.
  • In December 2025, Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Representative Chris Deluzio (D-Pa.) pressed the Trump administration to follow through on promises to limit defense companies’ stock buybacks and incentivize them to increase research and development spending.
  • In December 2025, Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) called for then-Attorney General Pam Bondi to recuse herself from the Department of Justice (DOJ)’s review of any Warner Bros. merger due to potential conflicts of interest related to her former employer, lobbying firm Ballard Partners.
  • In September 2025, Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), a member of the Senate Finance Committee, wrote to Donald Korb, nominee for Chief Counsel for the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), ahead of Korb’s confirmation hearing, pressing him on his stark conflicts of interest and urging him to make ethics commitments to mitigate these conflicts.
  • In July 2025, Senators Warren (D-Mass.) and Rick Scott (R-Fla.) wrote to former Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin seeking an explanation and further information on his recent decision to start a strategic advisory firm. Austin had publicly promised Senator Warren during his 2021 confirmation process that he would not become a lobbyist after his government service ended.
  • In July 2023, United States Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee Subcommittee on Personnel, and Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), and United States Representatives Jason Crow (D-Colo.) and Suzan DelBene (D-Wash.) introduced the Retired Officers Conflict of Interest Act – a bill that would require public reporting on retired service members working on behalf of foreign governments and create civil penalties if they break the law.
  • In December 2020, Senator Warren (D-Mass.) and Representative Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) reintroduced the Anti-Corruption & Public Integrity Act to strengthen ethics laws and crack down on government officials’ conflicts of interest across the government.

###




The following sites updated: