Monday, April 28, 2025

Chump throws another tantrum

If you missed it, Convicted Felon Donald Chump is experiencing a historic poll slump.  You have to go back 80 years to find a U.S. president with such a low rating as they complete their first 100 days.  

Faced with this reality, guess what Mr. Chump chooses to do?  You got it.  Have a hissy fit and insist that the polls are wrong.  Travis Gettys (RAW STORY) reports:

"These people should be investigated for ELECTION FRAUD, and add in the FoxNews Pollster while you’re at it," Trump posted. "They are Negative Criminals who apologize to their subscribers and readers after I WIN ELECTIONS BIG, much bigger than their polls showed I would win, loose [sic] a lot of credibility, and then go on cheating and lying for the next cycle, only worse. They suffer from Trump Derangement Syndrome, and there is nothing that anyone, or anything, can do about it."

"THEY ARE SICK, almost only write negative stories about me no matter how well I am doing (99.9 percent at the Border, BEST NUMBER EVER!), AND ARE TRULY THE ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE!" Trump added. "I wish them well, but will continue to fight to, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!"


He is a spoiled brat surrounded by liars who tell him the country loves him, the world loves him, that he is the best in the world.

He is rotting garbage left out in the sun.  

And he really needs to stop living in denial.   Heather Digby Parton (SALON) notes:

House members in swing districts and senators in purple states are probably starting to feel a little bit antsy. If this pattern follows previous midterms, they could be looking at a blow out if Trump doesn't improve his numbers. This may play out over the next month as the Congress comes back into session and takes up the budget talks in earnest. Whatever divisions exist are going to manifest over the next month and we'll begin to see if there are any real cracks in the coalition in light of Trump's pathetic approval ratings.



The odds are very long that Donald Trump could be impeached again, to be honest.

But some members of the House of Representatives have been talking about it, and now a Democratic senator has indicated that he is on board with the idea as well.
Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-GA), who is facing a potentially tough re-election fight in a major swing state in 2026, said at a town hall this week in Marietta that Trump “has already exceeded any prior standard for impeachment.”
As reported by MSNBC, Ossoff laid out some reasons why.

“I mean, I saw just 48 hours ago, he is granting audiences to people who buy his meme coin,” Ossoff said, about Trump’s offer of a private dinner to those who have purchased his coin product.

“When the sitting president of the United States is selling access for what are effectively payments directly to him. There is no question that that rises to the level of an impeachable offense.”

If you think he has thrown a fit today -- and he has -- imagine what it will be like when he gets impeached for the third time.

This is C.I.'s "The Snapshot" for today:


 Monday, April 28, 2025.  Donald Chump's polls crater, the first 100 days have been a nightmare, if it weren't for lies then he'd have no 'good' news about the economy, all that Pete Hegseth, and much more.


At THE NEW REPUBLIC, Claire Potter and Neil J. Young serve up "JD Vance Likes 'Normal Gays.' Should We Count That as a Win?"  Should we count it as a win?  I don't know but it is good to know what his type is.  So when JD turns into Miss Sassy with that blonde wig, he's looking for a straight acting gay man?  Good to know his Grindr profile.  


Poor JD.  The first 100 days ends tomorrow and every day he has piled on that eyeline but accomplished nothing else.  In the s**t show that is the Donald Chump presidency, he's gotten lost like everything else.  


Michael Tomasky (TNR) observes:


Remember how April 2 was “Liberation Day”? That was the day Donald Trump announced his tariff regime; it was, I think, the third grand announcement out of about six total. I know you remember it—the shock to the markets created headlines that are hard to forget.

What you may not remember is that it was also Trump’s second Liberation Day. The first, I was reminded recently as I reread his inaugural address while reflecting on the administration’s 100-day mark that arrives this week, was Inauguration Day itself: “That is why each day under our administration of American patriots, we will be working to meet every crisis with dignity and power and strength. We will move with purpose and speed to bring back hope, prosperity, safety, and peace for citizens of every race, religion, color, and creed. For American citizens, January 20th, 2025, is Liberation Day.”

How’s that working out?

There is much to say about these 100 days. The odor of fascism is unmistakable—and entirely intentional. The bullying of universities and law firms; the probably illegal firings of those 18 inspectors general (you’d forgotten that one, I bet!); the ghastly executive order instructing the Justice Department to investigate two U.S. citizens for expressing their political views; the purposeful lawlessness of so many actions, designed to force showdown after showdown at what Trump assumes will be a pliant Supreme Court; the daily inversion of reality peddled by Karoline Leavitt, Cabinet officials, and not least Trump himself. 

And more: the brazenly indefensible treatment of Mahmoud Khalil, a legal resident and green card holder, arrested without a warrant and held in a Louisiana detention facility where he missed the recent birth of his son, apparently just for engaging in political activism that Trump didn’t like. The clearly illegal deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia. The list goes on and on, and now, as of last week, includes a two-year-old U.S. citizen who was deported and another child-citizen with metastatic cancer who was deported without access to medication

[. . .]

First and more obviously, we have the prospect of the impact of Trump’s tariffs policy on real people. Will they cause inflation and a recession, as most experts now believe? As fate would have it, Trump will go to bed the night of his 100th day in office—Tuesday—and wake up the very next morning to the release of the first quarter GDP number. Economists expect anemic results. The Atlanta Fed even predicts negative growth, around -2.5 percent. During Trump’s first week in office, its forecast nudged a gaudy 4 percent, but the president’s actions have liberated that figure ever downward.

Second and more insidiously: Even the gross incompetencies take us into treacherous territory because they contribute to making this all about one man, the man who must be in front of the cameras every day. He doesn’t have policies so much as he has urges, which he must announce to the world on a constant basis in a desperate plea that we keep him front of mind at all times. Some of those urges are cruel; some of them are a joke. What unites them is that they make the story entirely about him.

That is not how it’s supposed to work in democracies. Which we still are, for now, as we reach this 100-day mark. Only 1,361 to go.


RAW STORY's Travis Gettys notes that Chump granted an interview to THE ATLANTIC and quotes Chump insisting, " I run the country -- and the world."

I believe that's a typo.


I think what Donald Chump actually said was, "I ruin the country -- and the world."


That would certainly be in keeping with reactions others are having.  


Dan Balz, Scott Clement, and Emily Guskin (WASHINGTON POST) note, "As he nears the end of his first 100 days in office, President Donald Trump is facing growing opposition to his ambitious and controversial agenda, with his approval rating in decline, majority opposition to major initiatives, and perceptions that his administration is seeking to avoid complying with federal court orders, according to a Washington Post-ABC News-Ipsos poll."   



President Donald Trump's approval rating has dipped below 40 percent, according to a new survey by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research.

The survey also found that about four in 10 Americans say Trump has been a "terrible" president during his second term, with about one in 10 describing his performance as "poor," and two in 10 saying he has been "average." Only three in 10 Americans rated Trump's performance as "great" or "good."


See, it's not just one poll.  Adam Gabbatt (GUARDIAN) explains:


Americans, including some Republicans, are losing faith in Donald Trump across a range of key issues, according to polling released this week. One survey found a majority describing the president’s second stint in the White House so far as “scary”.

Along with poor ratings on the economy and Trump’s immigration policy, a survey released on Saturday found that only 24% of Americans believe Trump has focussed on the right priorities as president.

That poll comes as Trump’s popularity is historically low for a leader this early in a term. More than half of voters disapprove of Trump’s performance as president, and majorities oppose his tariff policies and slashing of the federal workforce.


Not just one poll, all the polls.  Julianne McShane (MOTHER JONES) notes:


New polls show that President Donald Trump’s approval rating has hit record lows as he nears the 100-day mark of his second term on Tuesday.

An ABC News/Washington Post/Ipsos poll found that Trump has the lowest 100-day approval rating of any president in the past 80 years, with only 39 percent of respondents saying they approve of Trump’s term thus far. The 80-year comparison appears to refer to when Gallup first started measuring public approval of presidents, back during President Harry Truman’s term; according to data compiled by ABC, Trump had the lowest approval ratings of all presidents at 100 days in both of his terms, and he’s the only president to have the disapproval of the majority of Americans only three months into his term.

Seventy-two percent of respondents to the ABC poll also said they believe Trump’s economic policies—such as his tariff-induced global trade war—will likely cause a recession in the short term, and 53 percent believe the economy has gotten worse since Trump took office. More than 60 percent said that his administration does not respect the rule of law and that he is going too far in trying to expand his power. Majorities also disapproved of nearly every other action. The poll asked about Trump’s moves—reducing funding for medical research, shutting down the Department of Education, freezing foreign humanitarian aid, seeking to deport international students, and sending a group of Venezuelans to a notorious prison in El Salvador without due process—and they were all disliked.


Some BLUESKY reactions.







The Convicted Felon feels certain things aren't being factored in.  Like his talks with China.  Or, rather, 'talks' with China.    Pablo R. Suanzes (EL MUNDO) reports:


The president claims Xi called him, and Beijing demands that he "stop creating confusion" with "baseless rumors".

Donald Trump likes to boast and exaggerate. Every day he claims to have broken all kinds of historical records, surpassed unprecedented marks, achieved feats more than successes. This not only involves inflating macroeconomic figures or saying things that are obviously false, such as having already reached 200 trade agreements in recent days, but also putting leaders of other countries in a more than uncomfortable position, torn between correcting inaccuracies or blatant lies, unleashing the wrath of the White House, or avoiding problems by ignoring or dodging questions. 


If people would just accept lies, Chump would be doing so much better, right?


Secretary of the Treasure Scott Bessent went on ABC's THIS WEEK and, sadly, Martha Raddatz wanted facts, not lies.


Excerpt.

RADDATZ: OK. And now I am joined by President Trump's Treasury secretary, Scott Bessent.

Thanks for joining us this morning, Mr. Secretary. We appreciate it.

Let's start with the polls. For the very first time the president's polling numbers on the economy are under water with 53 percent saying it has gotten worse under President Trump, with 72 percent of those in our poll saying it is very or somewhat likely that his economic policies will cause a recession.

Your reaction?

SCOTT BESSENT, U.S. TREASURY SECRETARY: Well, Martha, I haven't seen the polls. And for the past 35 years, my business was analyzing data. So, I think we’ve probably got to dig down into those.

But what I do know is that Americans are behaving very different than what the surveys say. So, the surveys may say that, but consumers are still spending. So, I prefer to look at what Americans are doing rather than how they're answering pollsters.

RADDATZ: And it doesn't worry you the poll numbers that you have seen?

BESSENT: When I start seeing data to the contrary, then the – we can look at that. But, you know, again, these poll numbers, and also, you know, when I look at the sum of the things that are being published, there was a story ten days ago that said, this is the worst April for the stock market since the Great Depression. Ten days later, the Nasdaq is now up in the month of April. And I haven't seen a story that says, oh, the stock market has biggest bounce back ever. So, I think – I think –

RADDATZ: Well, it certainly – it certainly has gone back and forth.

Let – let’s jump –

BESSENT: I think a lot of this is media driven.

RADDATZ: Let's talk about the "Time" interview with President Trump. He said he has made 200 deals on tariffs. Two hundred deals? Who has he made deals with? Is there actually any deal at this point?

BESSENT: I believe that he is referring to sub deals within the negotiations we're doing. And, you know, Martha, if there are 180 countries –

RADDATZ: But those aren't actual deals?

BESSENT: Martha, if there are 180 countries, there are 18 important trading partners, let's put China to the side, because that's a special negotiation, there's 17 important trading partners, and we have a process in place, over the next 90 days, to negotiate with them. Some of those are moving along very well, especially the – with the Asian countries.

RADDATZ: And President Trump's strategy really has been to announce these tariffs, and dial some back, pause them, make exceptions. Explain why you see this as a good negotiating strategy.

BESSENT: Well, in game theory, it's called strategic uncertainty. So, you're not going to tell the person on the other side of the negotiation where you're going to end up. And nobody’s better at creating this leverage than President Trump. You know, he's shown these – the high tariffs, and here's the stick. This is where the tariffs can go. And the carrot is, come to us, take off your tariffs, take off your non-tariff trade barriers, stop manipulating your currency, stop subsidizing labor and capital and then we can talk.

But I tell you, Martha, that we've had several of these Asian countries have come in and said, oh, well, we'll stop doing this, this, and this. And I look at these lists and I think, how did we get here? How did we get here? Because this trading system has been so unfair. And as President Trump says, I don't blame the countries, I blame the previous administrations that let them get away with it.

RADDATZ: But, Mr. Secretary, look at what you just heard from Barton O’Brien there. The administration says it's worried about main street not Wall Street. But you heard that smallbusinessman saying his inventory in China might as well be lit on fire because already what has happened and the concern about what's happening next.

How do they plan for things if they don't know what's going to happen?


[. . .]

RADDATZ: Let's talk about China. President Trump, again, said he's spoken to President Xi of China, and negotiations are ongoing. But China has firmly denied this saying that China and the U.S. have not consulted or negotiated on the tariff issue.

So are negotiations actually happening? Who is talking?

BESSENT: Look, this was IMF-World Bank Week. They are in D.C., as you know. I had interaction with my Chinese counterparts, but it was more on the traditional things like financial stability, global economic early warnings. I don't know if President Trump has spoken with President Xi. I know they have a very good relationship and a lot of respect for each other.

But, again, I think the Chinese will see this high tariff level is unsustainable for their business.

RADDATZ: Why would they deny that negotiations are going on?


Mean Martha!  Wanting facts when Scott just wanted to sell lies.


By the way, I want to emphasize this already noted above:


Because this trading system has been so unfair. And as President Trump says, I don't blame the countries, I blame the previous administrations that let them get away with it.


The previous administrations?  Because, from the start of 2017 to the start of 2021, that would include Chump himself.  Is Chump now saying that he failed the country in his first administration?


His current administration is a huge failure.  

If I were Tulsi Gabbard or Robert Kennedy Junior or, honestly, any of the inept members of his Cabinet, I would wake up each day thrilled that Chump hadn't yet fired Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth because he takes the heat off the rest of them with his never ending screw ups.  Simon Druker (UPI) reminds, "Last month, Hegseth made headlines after accidentally leaking confidential military plans related to a then-pending military strike by accidentally including The Atlantic editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg in a Signal group chat." And then we all learned of another nonsecure group chat -- this one also on Signal but on his personal phone -- not his government issued phone -- where he shared details of impending strikes with his wife, his brother, his attorney and, who knows,  possibly his butcher.  Tom Bowman and Quil Lawrence (NPR) reported Friday:


Normally the names of senior staff at the Pentagon don't make the news, but the precarious position of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth means that every move is drawing scrutiny. NPR reported this week that the White House is looking for possible replacements with Hegseth under fire for putting sensitive military attack plans into at least two insecure group chats.

In-fighting over alleged leaks from the secretary's office have now resulted in five senior advisers resigning or being fired. On Friday the Pentagon announced four new senior advisers had been promoted; they include Col. Ricky Buria, a former junior military assistant; Justin Fulcher, a member of the DOGE team embedded at the Pentagon, and Patrick Weaver, formerly a Department of Defense "special assistant."


He has betrayed the country and he risked national security.  Not once.  And Chump deserves to be impeached for not removing Hegseth from office.  John Stoehr notes:


Last weekend, in an opinion piece for Politico, a former Pentagon spokesman warned that “there are very likely more shoes to drop in short order, with even bigger bombshell stories coming this week.”

And lo, a voice came:

Wall Street Journal: “Polygraph Threats, Leaks and Infighting: The Chaos Inside Hegseth’s Pentagon”;

・Associated Press: “Hegseth had an unsecured internet line set up in his office to connect to Signal”;

Times: “Hegseth’s Personal Phone Use Created Vulnerabilities”;

・National Public Radio: “Former Pentagon official on Hegseth turmoil: ‘It looks like they actually broke the law’”;

・CBS: “Hegseth orders makeup studio installed at Pentagon.”

Unfortunately, we are where we were at the beginning of the week. Hegseth isn’t going anywhere. Yes, he is “embattled,” as we say in the news, but every story about him says that Donald Trump has his back.


Tom Vanden Brook and Michael Loria (USA TODAY) remind, "Hegseth has denied releasing sensitive information. But several current and former military officials have told USA TODAY that the information Hegseth disclosed, the timing of attacks, is among the most closely guarded national security information."  And former National Secuirty Advisor (2013 to 2017) Susan Rice explained to Brian Tyler Cohen, "Military operation details are by definition classified.  Deliberations about whether to conduct a military strike on an adversary are inherently classified.  So here they are engaging recklessly in classified discussions over unsecure commercial applications."  


Instead of owning his mistake, Hegseth blames others which is par for the course in the Chump administration.  Héctor Ríos Morales' report for THE LATIN TIMES captures this attitude in its headline, "DHS Says It's Not To Be Legally Accountable For Court-Barred Deportations Because They Were Carried Out By DoD."  When he was president, Harry S. Truman said, "The buck stops here."  Chump not only chooses bitcoin over dollars, he also chooses dishonesty over accountability which is why his report card for his first 100 days is a solid F.


Meanwhile, Chump's shock troops attacked Colorado Springs yesterday.  Edward Helmore (GUARDIAN) reports:


More than 300 law enforcement officers from at least 10 federal agencies raided an illegal after-hours nightclub in Colorado Springs early on Sunday, arresting more than 100 people authorities said were undocumented immigrants and seizing guns, cocaine, meth and pink cocaine.

More than a dozen active-duty military members were detained as well, authorities said.

The federal Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) posted a video on X of the post-raid scene, with dozens of partygoers holding their hands up. Another video showed dozens of people fleeing the building through its entrance after federal agents smashed a window.

The DEA Rocky Mountain division said agents with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice), the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), homeland security, the US army’s criminal investigation division and the Colorado Springs police had joined the raid.


No paperwork on them!  In the early Sunday morning hours!  At a night club!  And they didn't have paperwork!


How many of the 100 do you think are citizens?  30?  50?  Even more?  What's your guess?  Chump is a menace and that's why the American people have turned on him.  


Kat's "Kat's Korner: Marilyn Monroe's gifts weren't just visual" went up Sunday.  The following sites updated:


Friday, April 25, 2025

Chump and his ship of fools

Convicted Felon Donald Chump is a small man with a small mind who has managed to stir up a world of hate.  Alexandra Bullard and Kirsty McCormack (THE DAILY MIRROR) report:

British television presenter Julia Hartley-Brewer claimed President Donald Trump is 'embarrassing his own country' during an on-air rant on Thursday.

Talk TV anchor Julia was joined by ex-senior military intelligence officer Philip Ingram on her most recent show as they spoke about Trump, who recently said he's "not happy" with the Russian bombing of Kyiv.
During their conversation, Philip claimed that Trump giving Crimea territory to Russia is "illogical" and "plays into Putin's hands".

The world laughs at us for having a fool like Mr. Chump as a president.  Twice.  He is a fool and he has staffed his administration with fools. 

How foolish are they?  Adam Lynch notes:

The New York Times reports the Trump administration is firing its own attorneys over alleged incompetence.

The U.S. Department of Transportation on Thursday made the peculiar move of replacing its federal lawyers defending it in a lawsuit over New York City’s congestion pricing program, allegedly because the lawyers undermined the department’s case.

New York wants to impose a $9 entrance fee to Manhattan to reduce gridlock, cut pollution and fund critical transit projects — but Trump called the program "illegal," and has demanded the state halt the plan or risk the White House slashing federal funding and approval for transit projects. U.S. Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy wrote a letter to New York Gov. Kathy Hochul warning she has until May 21 to explain why his department should not withhold federal funding, with a promise to begin penalizing the state May 28.
New York sued the U.S. government over the threats in federal court, but yesterday the Manhattan U.S. attorney’s office reported it had mistakenly filed a confidential memo that criticized the department’s legal strategy.

Trina covered the mix up last night in "Roasted Yellow Squash:"

News?  I'm really bothered by inept and corrupt administration.  I guess I'll tackle a Trump tart?  Pam Bonci, anyone?




In a court filing Thursday morning, the Justice Department confessed that it accidentally publicly uploaded a letter in which the DOJ was giving legal advice to the Department of Transportation. Apparently, it had been intending to post a different letter to the judge in a court case involving the government's scrapping of New York City's congestion charge scheme.
Data engineer Émilia Decaudin pasted the screen captures of the letter on X after they went live on Wednesday.

Lawfare's Anna Bower noted that in a filing Wednesday, it "certainly looks like the Justice Department intended to file a letter to Judge Liman in MTA v. Duffy, but….it accidentally filed a letter containing its legal advice to the Department of Transportation instead."

According to the memo posted, on Wednesday, the DOJ said, "For the reasons below, it is unlikely that Judge Liman or further courts of review will accept the argument that the CBDTP was not a statutorily authorized 'value pricing' pilot under the Value Pricing Pilot Program ('VPPP')."

On Thursday, Bower posted an update with the new filing, saying, "The Justice Department filed a letter acknowledging that it inadvertently uploaded an attorney-client privileged document to the public docket last night. DOJ seeks to have the document permanently sealed or removed, and asks judge to hold that AC privilege was not waived."


ABC News covers the same story here.  

How stupid is Pam Bondi?  She can't run a department.  Do we not get how major that screw up was?  They handed over the case -- after wasting tax payer money to pursue it in the first place.  

What's really sad?  Pam Bondi might be one of the smarter ones in this administration.  She's miles ahead of, for example, Pete Hegseth, Peter Navarro, Robert Kennedy Junior and the idiot who is Secretary of Education -- Dried Up Hag, is that her name?  I think it is.  She's the unqualified person -- probably one of many -- who bought her way into the administration.  Having done so, Dried Up Hag is not attempting to ruin education for every American child.  It's too bad she can't get laid, that might relax her if she could.  



They are all fools, every last one of them.  They are destroying the country. Erkki Forster (DAILY BEAST) notes, "The gaffe came as President Donald Trump seeks to squash New York City’s new congestion pricing program, which charges most drivers $9 to enter parts of Manhattan in order to raise funds for the region’s mass transit system and reduce pollution and congestion."  They are so inept.  Adam Lynch notes:

Fox News Channel anchor Bret Baier delivered crushing news to President Donald Trump Thursday on "Special Report with Bret Baier."

“If you look at our new Fox News poll for the first 100 days job approval, compared to other presidents … the president is at 44 percent.”

The Wednesday poll, arguably with a favorable Republican bent, showed Trump's approval at a record low compared to other presidents including Joe Biden, who tracked 10 points ahead at 54 percent, and Barack Obama and George W. Bush, who rated 62 percent and 63 percent, respectively.
Trump even came in lower than he did in his first term, with Trump 1.0 beating Trump 2.0 by 1 percent at 45 percent.

Mr. Chump is, was, remains a loser.  It is a shame that so many had amnesia with regards to that fact.







This is C.I.'s "The Snapshot" for today:


Friday, April 25, 2025.  Hegseth needs to go and so does David Hogg. 




Retired Lieutenant General Ben Hodges, former commander of the U.S. Army Europe, told Newsweek that President Donald Trump's behavior is "dangerous" amid reports that Pete Hegseth, Trump's secretary of defense, shared war plans in group chats.
[. . .]
When asked if Hegseth should be fired by Trump or asked to resign amid the reports he shared attack plans in a second Signal chat with his wife, brother and personal lawyer, Hodges told Newsweek via email, "I think the first principle of leadership is a willingness to accept responsibility."

He added, "I see zero evidence that the President, Mr Hegseth, or frankly anyone in this Administration is actually willing to accept responsibility for any mistakes. This is dangerous because if one doesn't acknowledge a mistake, then there is little likelihood that the necessary corrections will be made to prevent it from happening again."

According to the Times, the second Signal chat included "detailed information" about upcoming strikes in Yemen on March 15.

Concluding, Hodges said: "It is also a terrible example for the Officers and NCO's [non-commissioned officers] and civilians in the Department of Defense as well as the Cadets and Midshipmen who are studying to become Officers. It is ridiculous to claim that classified information was not being passed on these Signal Chat group communications. Just because there was no big red folder saying 'war plans' does not mean there was no classified information...and this excuse only serves to highlight the incompetence, immaturity, and lack of seriousness for one of the most serious positions in the US Government."


He is exactly right.  Others also are sounding alarms. Ellen Mitchell (THE HILL) reports:

Three former service members-turned Democratic House lawmakers are demanding answers from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth about recent staffing upheavals at the Pentagon.

In a letter sent to Hegseth on Tuesday and led by former Navy intelligence officer Rep. Maggie Goodlander (D-N.H.), the group expressed “deep concern regarding the turmoil taking place at the Department of Defense under your leadership.”
Hegseth in the past week has ousted his deputy chief of staff, a senior adviser, and the chief of staff to the deputy Defense secretary, with his chief of staff reassigned to a new position within the department and a top spokesperson choosing to leave.

“Certainly it is the prerogative of every Secretary of Defense to choose his or her own staff, but the scale of these firings is simply staggering,” the letter reads, as first reported by Semafor.

What’s more concerning, they write, is that the staffing shake-up follows “wider unacceptable and dangerous behavior” at the department, including the revelation last month that Hegseth shared sensitive attack plans on the U.S. military operation in Yemen against Houthi militants in a Signal group chat that mistakenly included the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic.

It also was reported Sunday by The New York Times that Hegseth shared the same details about the Yemen airstrikes in a separate Signal text chain that included his wife, brother and personal lawyer. 



Yesterday's snapshot included this:

Susan Rice was on Lawrence O'Donnell's MSNBC show last night.  (Note, I'm beyond sick this morning.  I don't see the video at MSNBC, I was sick last night.  If it wasn't Lawrence, I'll note it tomorrow but as I'm remembering it, it was Lawrence's show.  ADDED: It wasn't Lawrence, it was Brian Tyler Cohen's YOUTUBE program, we'll note it in tomorrow's snapshot.])  Details of an impending military strike are top secret.  There's no debating this.  And Hegseth's sharing this on two unsecure chats. This outrageous.  She was the National Security Advisor from 2013 to 2017.  She knows what she's talking about.  She laid it out very cleary.  He broke the rules.


Here's the Brian Tyler Cohen video.




That whole interview is important but I'd especially emphasize this remark from Susan, "Military operation details are by definition classified.  Deliberations about whether to conduct a military strike on an adversary are inherently classified.  So here they are engaging recklessly in classified discussions over unsecure commercial applications."  But, again, that is an important discussion -- the entire sixteen minutes.  Susan has the facts. 

 
VOTE VETS offered their discussion this week on Hegseth and why he needs to go.



And more details emerge demonstrating just how unfit Hegseth is and just how much he refuses to follow even basic security protocls.  Daniel Hampton (RAW STORY) notes:


Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth had the Signal messaging app installed on his desktop computer in the Pentagon to circumvent poor cell service in the building, according to a new report in The Washington Post, which cited three people familiar with the matter.

The Post report said Hegseth "effectively 'cloned' the Signal app on his personal cellphone" following talks between Hegseth and his advisers on "how they could circumvent the lack of cellphone service in much of the Pentagon and more quickly coordinate with the White House and other top Trump officials using the encrypted app."
By installing Signal onto his desktop, Hegseth created a "workaround" to use the app in a classified area — where his cellphone and other personal devices are banned — to easily communicate with other government officials or his family, according to the report.
To boot, Hegseth had the app installed on a second computer in his office and expressed interest in installing a program that would allow him to send out text messages from the Pentagon, according to the report.

Security protocols are put in place for a reason.  Did Hegseth -- who had no experience at all -- not have to go through some form of training about communication protocols?


We know MAGA is a deeply stupid group -- who else would back non-educator and lonely and deeply troubled Linda McMahon for Secretary of Education -- but they don't even believe in the most basic of human resource training? 



These protocols are in place for a reason.

The Secretary of Defense has not only risked national security by refusing to follow them; he has also failed to set the tone.  As he lies and makes excuses in public for what went down, he is representing the DoD and he is saying to every employee there, 'Ignore the security protocols and do what you want because I don't believe that they matter.'

What does matter to Hegesth?  Trying to make his mug pretty, putting on make up.   Again, Daniel Hampton (RAW STORY):


A Massachusetts lawmaker slammed President Donald Trump's secretary of Defense on Wednesday afternoon as unserious following revelations he turned a room in the Pentagon into a makeup studio for TV spots.

Pete Hegseth ordered a makeup studio to be installed in the building, converting a green room next to the press briefing room into a space equipped for TV appearances. The Pentagon downplayed the report, calling it routine, though it comes amid broad slashes to government agencies.

Rep. Jake Auchincloss (D-MA) joined Jake Tapper on CNN's "The Lead" to tear into Hegseth.
"I think they understand that when an individual comes into that office, talks about returning the Pentagon to the warfighters, then spends three months installing a makeup studio inside the Pentagon so he can do Fox News hits is not an individual who is serious about improving morale or readiness within the Department of Defense," said Auchincloss.


The story stood out for me, not just because of the degree to which it defies Hegseth’s rhetoric about a “warrior ethos,” but also because of what we’re learning about his role on Donald Trump’s team. Indeed, the president chose a television personality to lead the Pentagon, so it stands to reason that he’d want a new makeup studio.

By all appearances, his job isn’t to serve an administrative role, overseeing one of the planet’s largest and most complex bureaucracies; his job is to effectively play the role of defense secretary on TV, saying words like “tough” and “strength” of Fox News as Trump nods along while watching.

Hegseth is less of a cabinet secretary and more of a camera-ready performer. He’s able to keep his job — at least for now — not through competent governance, but rather by responding to the CBS News report by publishing a tweet that read in part, “We should have installed tampon machines in every men’s bathroom at DoD instead — the leftist ‘news’ media would have loved that.”

It’s the sort of juvenile online trolling that makes Hegseth look ridiculous to everyone except those ingrained in far-right politics.

Let's note some BLUESKY reactions.









That last one is US House Rep Eric Swalwell.  And he's right about filing charges of impeachment against Hegseth but it's also true of Chump.  Chump is allowing our national security to be threatened by his appointee who has repeatedly been exposed as a security risk.  What does it take as this point for Chump to remove him?  Learning that his wife is his Russian controller?  What more does he have to do?


One more video on Hegseth.



That's James Carville.  Last night when I was putting in the videos that would go up overnight, I saw this and almost put it up but thought of all the e-mails Martha and Shirley would be reading today.

The videos that go up here?  They're important topics (Hegseth so Carville above) or a friend asked for them to go up.  I can post James -- and have -- without signing off on him.  I know him and have for years.  I think there's line from WILL & GRACE's reboot ("Sweatshop Annie & the Annoying Baby Shower"-- season 9, episode 13) that applies here, Ellen tells Grace (and others at a baby shower), ""You know, Rob's always like, 'We don't see Will and Grace enough.[  And I'm always like, 'We see them the right amount'."

I've called James out for many things over the years and it's not hard to if you pay attention.  Any campaign?  After he crows he was right.  And some used to find his moment where he was right.  But they ignored that he offered many other opinions.  Go look at his commentary on Kamala's campaign and see just how all over the map he was -- any outcome would have allowed him to claim he was right because he offered all these differing opinions.

James can also be actually right.  He can also reach some people, that others can't.  

David Hogg needs to step down from the DNC.  

His little cat fight with James was sad.

It's no longer sad, David's actions.

They are harmful to the Democratic Party.

I'm seeing the same crowd of bad actors who trashed Kamala and helped put Chump in office backing Hogg on BLUESKY.  

BLUESKY is not the world.

TWITTER was not the world.

Hogg wants to primary a long list of Democrats in office and we're hearing 801 reasons why.  Supposedly it's not about age.  But according to David's website it is and according to many of his supporters on BLUESKY it is.

And these idiots on BLUESKY -- as usual -- don't know a damn thing.

I'm actually for a retirement age for members of Congress and that's nothing new.  I've written of it here for two decades and we've covered it at THIRD for two decades.  At THIRD, we started hitting on it hard with Robert Byrd, who was over 90 years ole and removed as Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee.  We've noted that the deaths of some members in office result in anew campaigns ahead of the normal election cycle and that if they're dying from age that cost should be probably be billed to their estate.  We've focused on the Senate the most because that's a six year term.  The House is a two year term.  If voters want to send someone at death's door into Congress, that's their vote and their gamble.  

Six years is a lot more to gamble on.  We supported Dianne Feinstein's Democratic challenger because we knew she was too old and would likely die in office, which she did.

This is not a new issue for us. 

But it seems like a new one for his BLUESKY fans who really don't know what they're talking about.

And none of whom wants to note that Sainted Bernie Sanders should have retired long ago.

As long as he breathes, he is their excuse and their hero.  When he stops breathing, that'll probably still be the case.  But for those not working on the Bernie farm, the reality is that he speechifies and accomplishes nothing.  He's someone to be amused by, yes, but the Democrats have repeatedly said no to him on a national run. 

But the Davids attacking Schumer and other Democrats on BLUESKY don't say a word about Bernie.

We're getting to a place similar to the summer of 2024.

We knew Chump would destroy this country.  And smoe of us worked our asses off to campaign for Kamala Harris.  Others worked to defeat her -- others on the left -- DSA and its fake ass 'Uncommitted' 'movement.'


Maybe it's time for you to sit your ass down and shut your damn mouth if you weren't campaigning for Kamala?

Maybe you've enough damn damage for one century?

This country matters to a lot of us, democracy matters to a lot of us.

We've got to win at least one house of Congress in the mid-terms (November 2026).. I want both.  I think both are achievable.

David Hogg is not heping with that.

He's risking that and you have to wonder with the state of the nation right now, with so many lives at risk, White boy can't get his s**t together and wants to risk everything.

He's a blond girl, we get that right?

David's done nothing with his life to garner any attention.  But he's a blond girl.

Many other students were at the same school that got shot up.  Many of them were students of color.


In the '00s, when a child went missing, people began to notice the media coverage or the lack of.  If the missing child was a blond girl, it was wall-to-wall Matt Lauer clucking non-stop.  A child of color?  Crickets. 

And that same racism has benefitted David Hogg.  

But he doesn't want to cop to it.

He's accomplished nothing with his life.  

I thought he'd get involved in the DNC, learn a lot, come back in a year or so with some solid ideas.  Instead, his only idea is the one he's been pimping for years -- kick out the old guys in Congress!!!!

That would apparently make him feel better about himself.  And considering that he looks like Lena Dunham, I can understand his struggle to find some way to feel good about himself.

But, White man, you're putting a lot of lives at risk with your bulls**t.

And Uncommitted and David need to sit this out.

First off, if you've got 20 million to spend on races, you should be using that money for the general election.

Second, you are creating division as we speak within the party -- that's why you need to resign immediately from your DNC office.  That is not what DNC officials are supposed to do.

Third, you're distracting from the very real dangers of Donald Chump.

You want to do your pet cause, go do it in a better election cycle, White boy.

You haven't suffered under Chump.

You're not at risk of deportation, you're not a senior on a fixed income, you're not a Black person or an LGBTQ+ person at risk of being erased and having your rights taken away.

You're not a woman at risk of losing reproductive freedom.

No one is less impacted by Chump's destruction of this country than you are.

Stop gambling with our lives and our rights.

He wants heated, contested primaries with candidates he's going to fund who will rip into the incumbent.

He's stupid and ignorant.

And history does apply here.

We've seen this Tom Hayden style bulls**t before.  

Would Jimmy Carter have been a one-term candidate if John Anderson hadn't run?  Gore in 2000.  We've seen this over and over and we're aware of history.

David has no idea and he's putting us all at risk.


US House Rep Jay Smith is running for re-election and David's Joe Blond is running against him.  To win, Joe Blond destroys him with one charge after another.  Smith wins the primary but is left weakened.  And then the GOP candidate for Congress in that district goes up against a weakened Smith -- probably using many of the attacks that Blond used on Smith (like how the Willie Horton attack on Michael Dukakis actually started in the Dem primary long before Poppy Bush got ahold of it)..  That's how we can lose.

We need to be united.  If this isn't a one-of-a-kind moment in our history, then sure, let's all be David Hogg -- I'll get the knives so we can chop off our noses.

And if this isn't a one-of-a-kind moment in our history, let me know.  I'm doing everything I can online and off to fight back against Chump to the point that I am waking up to run to the bathroom and throw up.  I've got better things to do with my time if this isn't a serious moment in our country's history.

David Hogg needs to immediately step away from the DNC.  If he wants to pursue his idiotic plan on primaries, he can do so, but not as DNC official.  And, no, he can't step 'away' from his group and remain in the DNC.  He has to resign.


ADDED: 

The Black Commentator Issue #1038 is now Online
 
April 24, 2025



Read issue 1038

Our email address is BlackCommentator@gmail.com

Our voicemail number is 856.823.1739



The following sites updated: