But even I was shocked by something reader Melvin e-mailed me.
It is an article from CONSERVATIVE DAILY NEWS.
I am not familiar with the publication.
Martin West wrote the article which states four of The Clinton Foundation trustees are convicted or charged with fraud, etc.
This is from the article:
One of the most well-known board members is Vinod Gupta.
“Vinod Gupta, the founder and chairman of the database firm InfoUSA, was a major Clinton financial supporter who served as a foundation trustee,” the book says.
In 2008 he was charged with fraud by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for using company funds to support his luxurious lifestyle. He was alleged to have used more than $9.5 million in corporate funds to pay for personal jet travel, millions for his yacht, personal credit card expenses, and the cost of twenty cars. He settled with the SEC for $4 million.
Gupta also paid Bill Clinton a $3 million “consulting fee,” an act of misuse of corporate funds that brought shareholders to file a suit against him. The company eventually settled with shareholders to the tune of $13 million, Clinton Cash reports.
Another board member deeply tied to the financial corruptness is trustee Sant Chatwal, who has multiple convictions for illegal campaign financing, obstruction of justice, money laundering, and a list of other charges.
But wait, it gets so much better. Board trustee Victor Dahdaleh, was charged by the Serious Fraud Office in Great Britain with paying more than 35 million pounds in bribes to executives in Bahrain to win contracts of more than 2 billion pounds.
Another member, Rolando Gonzalez Bunster, “has been named in a fraud case in the Dominican Republic involving his company InterEnergy. The charges were filed by the Dominican government’s Anti-Corruption Alliance (ADOCCO). In 2013, Bunster was charged along with officials of a government agency concerning alleged ‘ballooned’ fees charged to the government.”
Is this true?
If it is, why is this not a major story in the media?
This is C.I.'s ''Iraq snapshot:"
Friday, August 26, 2016. Chaos and violence continue, Iraq's Parliament fires the Minister of Defense, and much more.
AP reports, "Iraq's minister of defense received a no-confidence vote from parliament Thursday just as Iraqi forces retook a key northern town near the Islamic State-held city of Mosul."
And that, per the Iraqi Constitution, is how you remove a Cabinet minister.
A vote of no-confidence.
You don't do it with Haider al-Abadi huffing and puffing that he needs a new Cabinet.
His Cabinet wasn't even two years old when he started throwing that tantrum.
And he does not have the right to remove a minister -- only the Parliament does.
Khalid al-Obeidi does have a process of appeals but it appears he's resigned to the dismissal.
In a series of Tweets, he offered:
AP reports, "Iraq's minister of defense received a no-confidence vote from parliament Thursday just as Iraqi forces retook a key northern town near the Islamic State-held city of Mosul."
And that, per the Iraqi Constitution, is how you remove a Cabinet minister.
A vote of no-confidence.
You don't do it with Haider al-Abadi huffing and puffing that he needs a new Cabinet.
His Cabinet wasn't even two years old when he started throwing that tantrum.
And he does not have the right to remove a minister -- only the Parliament does.
Khalid al-Obeidi does have a process of appeals but it appears he's resigned to the dismissal.
In a series of Tweets, he offered:
Finally, those who have brought Iraq to where it is now have won, so I ask the people and the army to excuse me. I tried to fight (1/8)
Dr. Khalid Al-Obeidi
corruption as much as possible, but it seems they are stronger, their voices are louder and their actions are longer. Regardless, I (2/8)
will remain a soldier among the brave soldiers of the Iraqi people who fight corruption and corrupt people.
Thank you to all those who (3/8)
voted in our favour, stood with us, appreciated our position & supported us.
To the people of Iraq, you are the ones who can judge my (4/8)
efforts. God is my witness that I exerted every effort to rebuild the army & the military institution, along with tireless efforts to (5/8)
fight corruption and the corrupt, prevent nepotism and clientelism that caused Iraq in 2014 to lose 40% of its land and displace (6/8)
millions of people and threaten the sacred places and our beloved capital Baghdad. (7/8)
I take great pride in the welcome I received from you in Adhamiya & Kadhimiya - a testimony for me in front of all the corrupt people.
(8/8)
From the start, al-Obeidi was seen as a controversial figure.
His divisiveness was well known and part of the reason that he failed in his 2010 nomination for Defense Minister.
Four years later, he made the cut but was seen as sop tossed out to get an even more controversial figure named Minister of the Interior.
al-Obeidi was not popular with Sunni tribal leaders or with provincial and municipal government figures.
STRATFOR notes, "During al-Obeidi's tenure, the Iraqi parliament has twice opened investigations into corruption charges against him regarding defense procurement contracts. In the course of the second investigation, al-Obeidi openly accused several lawmakers and the parliamentary speaker of trying to blackmail him to secure contracts of their own. But after reviewing the case, Iraq's judiciary released the parliamentary speaker citing a lack of evidence, and a number of lawmakers demanded a vote of no confidence be held against al-Obeidi."
Unlike the Speaker of Parliement, al-Obidi had few friends left having provoked so many in the two years he held the post of Defense Minister.
AFP notes the military was suffering under the leadership or 'leadership' of Nouri al-Maliki, prime minister of Iraq from 2006 through 2014:
Maliki had been premier for eight years when the army, gangrened by nepotism and hollowed out by a system in which "ghost soldiers" enrolled but did not show up for duty, collapsed completely in the face of a vast June 2014 IS assault.
How big is the news?
Here's your answer: have you ever seen Brett McGurk Tweet so furiously:
Brett McGurk
In #Iraq – we are encouraged by impressive gains towards #Mosul in recent weeks by Iraqi Security Forces and Kurdish #Peshmerga. 7/10
In the lead up to the efforts to retake Mosul -- seized by the Islamic State over two years ago -- Iraq's just fired the Minister of Defense.
Yesterday, the US Defense Dept announced:
Strike in Iraq
-- Near Ramadi, fighter aircraft conducted one strike in Iraq, destroying four rocket systems and four rocket rails. The strike was coordinated with and in support of Iraq’s government.
Task force officials define a strike as one or more kinetic events that occur in roughly the same geographic location to produce a single, sometimes cumulative, effect. Therefore, officials explained, a single aircraft delivering a single weapon against a lone ISIL vehicle is one strike, but so is multiple aircraft delivering dozens of weapons against buildings, vehicles and weapon systems in a compound, for example, having the cumulative effect of making those targets harder or impossible for ISIL to use. Accordingly, officials said, they do not report the number or type of aircraft employed in a strike, the number of munitions dropped in each strike, or the number of individual munition impact points against a target. Ground-based artillery fired in counterfire or in fire support to maneuver roles is not classified as a strike.
CNN'sa Arwa Damon is back in Iraq.
- Watch: These two Americans traveled to Iraq to fight ISIS on the medical front lines, @arwaCNN reports
