As an African-American, I have struggled to understand why so many of my black brothers and sisters seem to prefer Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders.
Some have argued that black people are terrified at the prospect of a Donald Trump presidency, and so they rally around Clinton under the belief that she is more electable in the November general contest. However, looking at the election results so far it seems clear that Bernie Sanders actually stands the best chance of prevailing over Trump.
Then there’s the notion that Hillary Clinton is somehow preserving Barack Obama’s legacy: just a few short months ago she was going out of her way to distance herself from the Obama administration because she believed it was politically expedient to do so. Now, under threat from Sanders’ insurgency, she is cynically trying to sell herself as Obama’s right hand. But of course, the moment she locks down the nomination she’ll go back to drawing contrast–the Clintons have always been leaders at “vote capturing.”
But perhaps the most disturbing of all is the insinuation that Hillary Clinton has some kind of proud and storied legacy in the service of black empowerment. She doesn’t.
Reading the article, which I strongly recommend, I was struck by how Hillary Clinton never leads on anything.
Or anything of value.
Maybe it is easier to notice with LGBT rights because it is so recent.
But there she was supporting the so-called Defense Of Marriage Act of the 90s -- preventing gays and lesbians from getting married -- and she continues to support it through 2013.
Even after Vice President Joe Biden has come out in favor of marriage equality, Hillary Rodham Clinton still cannot support it.
Only after the polling made clear that times had long ago changed did she suddenly change her mind.
And that is how she is on race.
When it is 'up' in the polling to be racist, she is.
She has no core.
She has no soul.
This is C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"
Saturday, April 2, 2016. Chaos and violence continue, more objections
to Haider al-Abadi's proposal of a new cabinet emerge, War Hawk Hillary
Clinton's vote for and support of the Iraq War are not forgotten, and
much more.
Yesterday, the White House issued the following statement:
On political developments?
Elections.
We tried to make a point repeatedly this week. Some caught it, some didn't.
You either oppose the notion that a new Cabinet can just be created or you pretend that Iraq didn't hold elections in 2014.
Haider's just going to form a new Cabinet.
That only happens after an election.
Iraq did have elections in 2014.
From the May 19, 2014 snapshot:
Reuters reports, "Preliminary results on Monday showed Maliki won at least 94 seats, far more than his two main Shi'ite rivals, the movement of Muqtada Sadr, which picked up 28 seats, and the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq (ISCI), which won 29 seats." Press TV reports, "Results released by Iraq's Independent High Electoral Commission on Monday showed that the premier’s State of Law alliance garnered 92 out of 328 parliamentary seats. Maliki’s bloc won 30 seats in the capital Baghdad alone and won the first spot in 10 out of 18 provinces overall, while his main rivals are said to have gained between 19 and 29 seats in total." Sinan Salaheddin and Sameer N. Yacoub (AP) reports 92 as well and point out, "He will still need to approach other parties to piece together a broader majority coalition to get the first crack at forming a government as violence rages and instability grows." Duraid Adnan and Tim Arango (New York Times) point out that these are "initial results -- still subject to challenges from various political parties" while stating Nouri won 93 seats.
But if elections took place, how can a Haider al-Abadi in 2016 propose a new Cabinet?
He can't.
Not per the Constitution of Iraq.
One member of the Cabinet can be ousted this way:
Eighth:
A. The Council of Representatives may withdraw confidence from one of the Ministers by an absolute majority and he is considered resigned from the date of the decision of confidence withdrawal. The issue of no confidence in the Minister may be tabled only on that Minister's wish or on a signed request of fifty members after an inquiry discussion directed at him. The Council of Representatives shall not issue its decision regarding the request except after at least seven days of its submission.
The entire Cabinet can be ousted this way:
D. In case of a vote of withdrawal of confidence in the Cabinet as a whole, the Prime Minister and the Ministers continue in their positions to run everyday business for a period not to exceed thirty days until a new cabinet is formed in accordance with the provisions of article 73 of this constitution.
But since when does the US government, the White House, really support rule of law in Iraq?
Never.
The only way a new Cabinet can be proposed is following elections.
Otherwise?
Otherwise, the Cabinet has to be shut down by Parliament via a vote withdrawing confidence.
Where is the faith in rule of law?
The US State Dept loves to give lip service to the rule of law in Iraq when it benefits their goals, otherwise they stay silent.
The United Nations and the White House could've called for new elections in Iraq if they wanted a new Cabinet.
But,per the Constitution, short of that the only way a new Cabinet comes about is via a vote of no-confidence in the Parliament.
The rule of law is followed or it's not.
AL MADA notes that the proposed Cabinet was greeted earlier this week by a statement from KRG president Massoud Barzani who declared Haider's proposal had no importance and that it was long ago cleared there was no true partnership in the current government.
What's really amazing is how little objections to Haider's proposed Cabinet is covered by the international press.
There was an election in Iraq today. Ammar al-Hakim was re-elected as the leader of the (Shi'ite) political body the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq. And ISCI issued a statement that any political reforms (the Cabinet) should not weaken the law or increase political differences.
ALL IRAQ NEWS notes Ammar issued a statement as well when he noted reform did not equal proposing a new Cabinet.
Ammar held a press conference today where he expressed surprise by Haider al-Abadi's proposal to reform the Cabinet. This as NATIONAL IRAQI NEWS AGENCY reports that there is strong division in Parliament over Haider's proposed Cabinet with some likening Haider's proposals to the start of a "dictatorship."
Meanwhile AL MADA notes that the Kurds continue to demand 20% of the positions on any new Cabinet while Haider's nominees are facing criticism from Sunni political blocs.
But it's the Shi'ite criticism that's emerging and the most vocal. IRAQ TIMES notes State of Law MP Kazem al-Sayadi has declared that, no way, no how, will any former member of the Ba'ath Party sit in the Cabinet.
In addition, ALSUMARIA reports that the Coalition of National Forces are also voicing objection to Haider's proposal with MP Khaled Mafraji declaring that what Haider has done is both incorrect and illegal.
As if Haider's proposal didn't have enough problems to face, it's already minus one.
NATIONAL IRAQI NEWS AGENCY reports Nazar Muahmmad Salim al-Numan withdrew his name from consideration on Friday. Haider had nominated him on Thursday to be the Minister of Oil. He stated he was withdrawing his name due to a "lack of political consensus."
IRAQ TIMES notes additional criticism of Haider's proposal -- MP Ghaida Kmbh has come out against Haider's proposal to eliminate some ministries and combine others.
This was supposed to be an easy move.
But someone in the US government forgot that there are no easy moves in Iraq.
ALSUMARIA reports that 1 woman was shot dead in house outside Baghdad, a bomb to the south of Baghdad killed 7 Iraqi soldiers,
Friday, the US Defense Dept announced/boasted:
Strikes in Iraq
-- Rocket artillery and fighter and remotely piloted aircraft conducted 12 strikes in Iraq, coordinated with and in support of Iraq’s government:
-- Near Habbaniyah, a strike struck an ISIL tactical unit.
-- Near Hit, three strikes struck an ISIL tactical unit, destroying an ISIL vehicle-borne bomb, two ISIL bomb factories, an ISIL vehicle, an ISIL anti-air artillery staging area and nine ISIL tunnel entrances and denying ISIL access to terrain.
-- Near Kirkuk, a strike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed two ISIL assembly areas.
-- Near Mosul, two strikes struck two separate ISIL tactical units and destroyed two ISIL assembly areas and five ISIL vehicles.
-- Near Qayyarah, two strikes destroyed an ISIL tactical vehicle and an ISIL mortar firing position and suppressed two separate ISIL mortar firing positions.
-- Near Ramadi, a strike destroyed two ISIL vehicle-borne bombs.
-- Near Sinjar, a strike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL assembly area.
-- Near Sultan Abdallah, a strike destroyed three ISIL tunnel systems and three ISIL assembly areas.
Task force officials define a strike as one or more kinetic events that occur in roughly the same geographic location to produce a single, sometimes cumulative, effect. Therefore, officials explained, a single aircraft delivering a single weapon against a lone ISIL vehicle is one strike, but so is multiple aircraft delivering dozens of weapons against buildings, vehicles and weapon systems in a compound, for example, having the cumulative effect of making those targets harder or impossible for ISIL to use. Accordingly, officials said, they do not report the number or type of aircraft employed in a strike, the number of munitions dropped in each strike, or the number of individual munition impact points against a target. Ground-based artillery fired in counterfire or in fire support to maneuver roles is not classified as a strike.
Saturday, the US Defense Dept announced/boasted:
Strikes in Iraq
Rocket artillery and fighter and remotely piloted aircraft conducted 20 strikes in Iraq, coordinated with and in support of the Iraqi government:
Task force officials define a strike as one or more kinetic events that occur in roughly the same geographic location to produce a single, sometimes cumulative, effect. Therefore, officials explained, a single aircraft delivering a single weapon against a lone ISIL vehicle is one strike, but so is multiple aircraft delivering dozens of weapons against buildings, vehicles and weapon systems in a compound, for example, having the cumulative effect of making those targets harder or impossible for ISIL to use. Accordingly, officials said, they do not report the number or type of aircraft employed in a strike, the number of munitions dropped in each strike, or the number of individual munition impact points against a target.
On the subject of the Defense Dept, Nancy A. Youssef (THE DAILY BEAST) reported earlier this week:
Earlier this week, the top US commander in Iraq Tweeted the following:
And what of every singled US general?
As for the US,War Hawk and Pig At The Trough Hillary Clinton continues her battle with Senator Bernie Sanders for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination. The battle is noted in a series of Tweets below.
#feelthemath What was the number of dead in Iraq Hillary?
#ImSoSick of Hillary taking us all for fools. It's not our fault her record is so flawed. Sorry you voted for segregation and the Iraq war.
Yesterday, the White House issued the following statement:
The White House
For Immediate Release
April 01, 2016
Readout of Vice President Biden’s Call with Prime Minister Haider Al-Abadi of Iraq
The Vice President spoke today with Iraqi Prime Minister Haider
Al-Abadi to discuss the latest political and security developments in
Iraq. The Vice President welcomed the Prime Minister's political reform
efforts and reaffirmed continued U.S. support for steps, in concert with
Iraqi political leaders, to strengthen transparency, national unity,
and accountability. The Vice President also underscored the critical
importance of sustaining momentum in the fight against ISIL and
reviewed ongoing U.S. efforts to support Iraqi Security Forces. The
Vice President commended the Prime Minister for engaging constructively
with the IMF to address fiscal challenges and unlock access to
international financial assistance.
On political developments?
Elections.
We tried to make a point repeatedly this week. Some caught it, some didn't.
You either oppose the notion that a new Cabinet can just be created or you pretend that Iraq didn't hold elections in 2014.
Haider's just going to form a new Cabinet.
That only happens after an election.
Iraq did have elections in 2014.
From the May 19, 2014 snapshot:
Reuters reports, "Preliminary results on Monday showed Maliki won at least 94 seats, far more than his two main Shi'ite rivals, the movement of Muqtada Sadr, which picked up 28 seats, and the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq (ISCI), which won 29 seats." Press TV reports, "Results released by Iraq's Independent High Electoral Commission on Monday showed that the premier’s State of Law alliance garnered 92 out of 328 parliamentary seats. Maliki’s bloc won 30 seats in the capital Baghdad alone and won the first spot in 10 out of 18 provinces overall, while his main rivals are said to have gained between 19 and 29 seats in total." Sinan Salaheddin and Sameer N. Yacoub (AP) reports 92 as well and point out, "He will still need to approach other parties to piece together a broader majority coalition to get the first crack at forming a government as violence rages and instability grows." Duraid Adnan and Tim Arango (New York Times) point out that these are "initial results -- still subject to challenges from various political parties" while stating Nouri won 93 seats.
But if elections took place, how can a Haider al-Abadi in 2016 propose a new Cabinet?
He can't.
Not per the Constitution of Iraq.
One member of the Cabinet can be ousted this way:
Eighth:
A. The Council of Representatives may withdraw confidence from one of the Ministers by an absolute majority and he is considered resigned from the date of the decision of confidence withdrawal. The issue of no confidence in the Minister may be tabled only on that Minister's wish or on a signed request of fifty members after an inquiry discussion directed at him. The Council of Representatives shall not issue its decision regarding the request except after at least seven days of its submission.
The entire Cabinet can be ousted this way:
D. In case of a vote of withdrawal of confidence in the Cabinet as a whole, the Prime Minister and the Ministers continue in their positions to run everyday business for a period not to exceed thirty days until a new cabinet is formed in accordance with the provisions of article 73 of this constitution.
But since when does the US government, the White House, really support rule of law in Iraq?
Never.
The only way a new Cabinet can be proposed is following elections.
Otherwise?
Otherwise, the Cabinet has to be shut down by Parliament via a vote withdrawing confidence.
Where is the faith in rule of law?
The US State Dept loves to give lip service to the rule of law in Iraq when it benefits their goals, otherwise they stay silent.
The United Nations and the White House could've called for new elections in Iraq if they wanted a new Cabinet.
But,per the Constitution, short of that the only way a new Cabinet comes about is via a vote of no-confidence in the Parliament.
The rule of law is followed or it's not.
AL MADA notes that the proposed Cabinet was greeted earlier this week by a statement from KRG president Massoud Barzani who declared Haider's proposal had no importance and that it was long ago cleared there was no true partnership in the current government.
What's really amazing is how little objections to Haider's proposed Cabinet is covered by the international press.
There was an election in Iraq today. Ammar al-Hakim was re-elected as the leader of the (Shi'ite) political body the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq. And ISCI issued a statement that any political reforms (the Cabinet) should not weaken the law or increase political differences.
ALL IRAQ NEWS notes Ammar issued a statement as well when he noted reform did not equal proposing a new Cabinet.
Ammar held a press conference today where he expressed surprise by Haider al-Abadi's proposal to reform the Cabinet. This as NATIONAL IRAQI NEWS AGENCY reports that there is strong division in Parliament over Haider's proposed Cabinet with some likening Haider's proposals to the start of a "dictatorship."
Meanwhile AL MADA notes that the Kurds continue to demand 20% of the positions on any new Cabinet while Haider's nominees are facing criticism from Sunni political blocs.
But it's the Shi'ite criticism that's emerging and the most vocal. IRAQ TIMES notes State of Law MP Kazem al-Sayadi has declared that, no way, no how, will any former member of the Ba'ath Party sit in the Cabinet.
In addition, ALSUMARIA reports that the Coalition of National Forces are also voicing objection to Haider's proposal with MP Khaled Mafraji declaring that what Haider has done is both incorrect and illegal.
As if Haider's proposal didn't have enough problems to face, it's already minus one.
NATIONAL IRAQI NEWS AGENCY reports Nazar Muahmmad Salim al-Numan withdrew his name from consideration on Friday. Haider had nominated him on Thursday to be the Minister of Oil. He stated he was withdrawing his name due to a "lack of political consensus."
IRAQ TIMES notes additional criticism of Haider's proposal -- MP Ghaida Kmbh has come out against Haider's proposal to eliminate some ministries and combine others.
This was supposed to be an easy move.
But someone in the US government forgot that there are no easy moves in Iraq.
ALSUMARIA reports that 1 woman was shot dead in house outside Baghdad, a bomb to the south of Baghdad killed 7 Iraqi soldiers,
Friday, the US Defense Dept announced/boasted:
Strikes in Iraq
-- Rocket artillery and fighter and remotely piloted aircraft conducted 12 strikes in Iraq, coordinated with and in support of Iraq’s government:
-- Near Habbaniyah, a strike struck an ISIL tactical unit.
-- Near Hit, three strikes struck an ISIL tactical unit, destroying an ISIL vehicle-borne bomb, two ISIL bomb factories, an ISIL vehicle, an ISIL anti-air artillery staging area and nine ISIL tunnel entrances and denying ISIL access to terrain.
-- Near Kirkuk, a strike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed two ISIL assembly areas.
-- Near Mosul, two strikes struck two separate ISIL tactical units and destroyed two ISIL assembly areas and five ISIL vehicles.
-- Near Qayyarah, two strikes destroyed an ISIL tactical vehicle and an ISIL mortar firing position and suppressed two separate ISIL mortar firing positions.
-- Near Ramadi, a strike destroyed two ISIL vehicle-borne bombs.
-- Near Sinjar, a strike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL assembly area.
-- Near Sultan Abdallah, a strike destroyed three ISIL tunnel systems and three ISIL assembly areas.
Task force officials define a strike as one or more kinetic events that occur in roughly the same geographic location to produce a single, sometimes cumulative, effect. Therefore, officials explained, a single aircraft delivering a single weapon against a lone ISIL vehicle is one strike, but so is multiple aircraft delivering dozens of weapons against buildings, vehicles and weapon systems in a compound, for example, having the cumulative effect of making those targets harder or impossible for ISIL to use. Accordingly, officials said, they do not report the number or type of aircraft employed in a strike, the number of munitions dropped in each strike, or the number of individual munition impact points against a target. Ground-based artillery fired in counterfire or in fire support to maneuver roles is not classified as a strike.
Saturday, the US Defense Dept announced/boasted:
Strikes in Iraq
Rocket artillery and fighter and remotely piloted aircraft conducted 20 strikes in Iraq, coordinated with and in support of the Iraqi government:
-- Near Qaim, a strike struck an ISIL tactical unit.
-- Near Habbaniyah, two strikes struck two separate ISIL tactical units and destroyed an ISIL weapons cache.
-- Near Haditha, a strike struck an ISIL tactical unit.
-- Near Hit, two strikes struck an
ISIL tactical unit, destroying an ISIL vehicle bomb, two ISIL fuel
tankers, an ISIL vehicle, an ISIL-used bridge, an ISIL barge and eight
ISIL boats and denying ISIL access to terrain.
-- Near Kirkuk, two strikes struck
an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL vehicle, an ISIL command
and control node, four ISIL assembly areas and an ISIL supply cache.
-- Near Qayyarah, seven strikes
struck three separate ISIL tactical units and an ISIL weapons cache and
destroyed two ISIL fighting positions, two ISIL assembly areas, an ISIL
command and control node, two ISIL vehicles and an ISIL unmanned aerial
vehicle.
-- Near Ramadi, a strike destroyed an ISIL anti-air artillery piece.
-- Near Sinjar, two strikes struck
a large ISIL tactical unit, destroying an ISIL vehicle and suppressing
an ISIL mortar firing position.
-- Near Sultan Abdallah, two strikes struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed six ISIL rocket rails and an ISIL supply cache.Task force officials define a strike as one or more kinetic events that occur in roughly the same geographic location to produce a single, sometimes cumulative, effect. Therefore, officials explained, a single aircraft delivering a single weapon against a lone ISIL vehicle is one strike, but so is multiple aircraft delivering dozens of weapons against buildings, vehicles and weapon systems in a compound, for example, having the cumulative effect of making those targets harder or impossible for ISIL to use. Accordingly, officials said, they do not report the number or type of aircraft employed in a strike, the number of munitions dropped in each strike, or the number of individual munition impact points against a target.
On the subject of the Defense Dept, Nancy A. Youssef (THE DAILY BEAST) reported earlier this week:
In the
war against the self-proclaimed Islamic State, the U.S. military is
notably short on soldiers, but apparently not on generals.
There
are at least 12 U.S. generals in Iraq, a stunningly high number for a
war that, if you believe the White House talking points, doesn’t involve American troops in combat.
And that number is, if anything, a conservative estimate, not taking
into account the flag officers running the U.S. air war, the admirals
helping wage the war from the sea, or their superiors back at the
Pentagon.
At
U.S. headquarters inside Baghdad’s fortified Green Zone, even majors and
colonels frequently find themselves saluting superiors at a pace that
outranks the Pentagon and certainly any normal military installation.
With about 5,000 troops deployed to Iraq and Syria ISIS war, that means
there’s a general for every 416 troops, give or take. To compare, there
are some captains in the U.S. Army in charge of that many people.
Earlier this week, the top US commander in Iraq Tweeted the following:
COL Steve Warren
And what of every singled US general?
As for the US,War Hawk and Pig At The Trough Hillary Clinton continues her battle with Senator Bernie Sanders for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination. The battle is noted in a series of Tweets below.
Skip Hatos
Hillary has been dead wrong on a lot of issues: predators, mass incarceration, private prisons, Monsanto, Iraq, big money #ApologizeForWhat
Not Hillary
I rather a future POTUS who mistakes endorsement's than one who votes for Iraq then calls it a mistake like Hillary!
-
#ApologizeForWhat: pitching Iraq as a "business opportunity"@davidsirota http://www.ibtimes.com/campaign-2016-hillary-clinton-pitched-iraq-business-opportunity-us-corporations-2121999 …
Taylor Hoefler
-
Hillary Clinton: Iraq is a 'Business Opportunity"
#Corporatism#WIPrimary#NYPrimary#FeelTheBern#ApologizeForWhat
TheNewDeal
-
#ApologizeForWhat Falling in line with George W and invading Iraq. We're still in this mess! https://youtu.be/DkS9y5t0tR0
Pete L Pusher
Jon Stall
Michael Oman-Reagan
In 2007 Obama said Hillary's vote for the Iraq War helped create "the biggest foreign policy disaster in our generation." @speechboy71
-
Hillary has never shown any regret or remorse for her vote to send our soldiers to die or be mutilated in Iraq.
I Want Real Change!
-
"We weren't supposed to go to Iraq." ~Rosario Dawson Reminder: Hillary voted for the War in Iraq
#BernieInTheBronx
Khaled Beydoun
-
"We weren't supposed to go to Iraq" Media sold us that = same media that's selling us Hillary
#BernieInTheBronx
Michael Ben
Cole Barrett
The Iraq War Cost Over $2 Trillion Dollars
4,000+ US Troops & 100,000+ Iraqi Civilians Died
Hillary Didn't Think That Was Too Expensive
Hillary Says Free Healthcare & College is Too Expensive
If Only She Felt That Way About the Iraq War & Wall Street Bailout
#FeelTheBern
