Wednesday, April 3, 2019

Zach Haller

Joe Biden has really ticked me off with his refusal to take accountability for his actions and his refusal to apologize to the women he groped.

Instead, I will focus on a positive.

Thanks everyone for the birthday wishes. So long, 25-34 age bracket, it’s been real. Here’s to another year transmitting conspiracy theories from my tinfoil hat to yours



Zach Haller probably does my favorite Twitter feed.  We used to be closer politically before the Democratic Party's presidential nomination was stolen from Senator Bernie Sanders last go round; however, regardless of his spot on the political spectrum, he remains a favorite writer of mine -- I love his articles -- and I check his Twitter feed at least once a day.

I hope he had a wonderful birthday and I hope he knows how much his work means to so many of us.

He is one of a kind.  Best wishes to him.

This is C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot" for today:


Wednesday, April 3, 2019.  As former Vice President Joe Biden prepares to announce his run for the presidency, two more women step forward.

And now there are four.  THE NEW YORK TIMES reported late yesterday that two more women have stepped forward to complain about Joe Biden groping them. Then 19-year-old Caitlyn Caruso was groped   Elaine offered an example of how the hideous Alyssa Milano might try to spin that:

Hagtress Alyssa Milano will, no doubt, show up to defend Joe Biden again.  Probably insist, "Yes, he touched Caitlyn's leg but he did so at 'an event about sexual assault' and we have to give him credit for attending the event!  That's the important thing!"



For years, we have had to endure the image of the wife standing next to the politician husband as he minimizes his actions.  Apparently, these days the Alyssa Milanos will rush forward to volunteer for the job.

The second woman is DJ Hill who explained that Joe's hands were slipping down her back when her husband stepped in to stop it.

RT CBSThisMorning: Four women are coming forward about former Vice President Joe Biden, saying he touched them in a way that made them feel uncomfortable.


5:30
323 views



Four women have now come forward and there are more women considering coming forward.  Applause for all four who have come forward.  This is not a conversation that America has ever wanted to have -- and judging by the offensive remarks of Alyssa Milano and others (Weight Gain McCain, for example), it's a conversation that the country will be forced to have.  Boys will be boys and Biden will be Biden appears to be the position so many of them are taking.

In contrast to the willfully stupid, Jessica Valenti (MEDIUM) observes:


Those who believe this is simply a matter of misunderstanding must then fundamentally not trust women. But women have been dealing with these interactions since, unfortunately, before puberty. We are the utmost experts in what they mean — what’s appropriate and what’s demeaning.
I also wonder how many men would be fine with a boss who rubbed their shoulders while deeply inhaling the back of their head. The truth is that if men had to deal with a fraction of the indignities women are expected to endure, they would revolt.
The effect of these seemingly minor infractions is one that women know all too well: Every shoulder rub and unwanted kiss tells us how little our personal space, privacy, and dignity really mean. Women are reminded of our place again and again and again. And then, when we’re told it’s all in our heads, we’re reminded one more time.




It’s telling that Biden has constructed his defense around the claim that he never had the “intention” of causing women discomfort. He’s placed the burden of reckoning on the recipients of his actions, the women who mistook his friendly gestures as invasive and unsettling. But good intentions that forge ahead, time after time, with no regard for the unique circumstances of each situation are no longer good—they’re careless. Any leader might occasionally offend women or step out of line in physical interactions with them. But he’d do so in spite of his sincere best efforts, not because he seemingly didn’t care enough to try. 



It's really clear and it's really basic -- unless you're an enabler like Alyssa Milano.  If you're an enabler, you Tweet crap like this.

4. Joe Biden’s response that he never meant to make anyone uncomfortable and that he'll listen and learn from anyone who says otherwise is exactly the leadership we need to build a culture where women are heard and are equal.




"Listen and learn''?  He and his wife both called the Carters to get Stephanie to write that piece she wrote which, yes, is dismissing Lucy Flores.  But more to the point, he's 76-years-old and has been doing this forever.  There have been articles about it, there was Samantha Bee's infamous 2015 skit about it on THE DAILY SHOW.  At what point do we stop saying, "Oh, if only the women involved had expressly told him . . ."  No, it's his behavior and it's always been inappropriate.  He's gotten away with it and he knows he has.  He's only 'addressing' it now -- hiding behind women's skirts -- because he wants to bury it before his big "I am announcing I will seek the Democratic Party's presidential nomination" moment later this month.

He has shown no leadership on this issue.  He has ignored it and only responded when forced to.

I guess Alyssa's 'busy' schedule of doing nothing doesn't allow her time to brush up on issues or information.  She's got that bit part in the NETFLIX series everyone hated, remember?  She's so busy.  She's trying to punish the Georgia film industry these days but if she was serious she could announce that she won't go to Georgia to film INSATIABLE anymore, couldn't she?  She could take a stand if she wanted to but she doesn't want to give up her bi part as the middle-aged side piece.  She knows her talent is minimal and her future job prospects even more so.


Link to headline article

Some just don't get it.  Like this one:

Stop this insanity. If Joe Biden or anyone else sexually assaulted you, by all means please file charges. No matter when it happened. But if someone, touching you, male or female, makes you "uncomfortable," say something... to them...at the time. Even your cheek pinching grandma.



Randi's all about the women -- provided they're men in dresses wearing dresses for laughs.  She didn't really write a part for Sally Field into MRS. DOUBTFIRE, did she?  Just a stereotypical nag.  Well there are always women who will hate themselves and write that into their work.  Congratulations, Randi, may you soon become the man you always wanted to be -- right after you kill Mommy -- that was the point of MRS. DOUBTFIRE, after all.  And THE TOOTH FAIRY.  Let's not forget that.  Or that her body of work is all about rebuking women.  Yet she thinks she can step up and we're all supposed to listen?  Write another bad 'comedy,' Randi, channel your rage over being a woman into that -- again.

In the real world, and in the stories being shared, women explain that they were being groped by the Vice President of the United States and didn't believe they had any power.

But worry no more!  Randi's busy writing SISSY'S BIG MOVE.  Vin Diesel, desperate to get his 'high strung' and 'distant' ex-wife back, learns that his wife was groped by the CEO of her company and didn't feel she could speak out.  So Vin dons a dress and becomes Sissy McMatthews -- a sassy and brassy new hire from the south who shows how a man -- posing as a woman -- would handle it and -- as in all of Randi's works -- saves the day because -- in Randi's works -- that's what men do.  And his ex-wife, she'll take him back and feel more kindly towards the kitchen -- it's a Randi script which means it writes itself!  Go, Randi, go! And take your violet and blue mornings with you.




Joe voted for the Iraq War.

I feel like really if you set aside all the charges about Joe Biden then you’re left with a guy who greenlit the Iraq War while chairing the foreign relations committee, has apologized for his earlier work chairing judiciary, and was known as a top ally for credit card companies.




The Iraq War continues.   The never-ending wars continue.  The Defense Dept budget is a sink hole and Americans have less and less to show for their way of life as a result.


From David DeGraw:
Google has once again pulled my new report from their search results. This is the second report on whistleblowers being silenced that they have censored. The first report eventually got relisted after making noise about it on social media. Let's see what happens with this one...

Please help spread the word on Twitter here and Facebook here.
Get the full 45-page report in PDF format here and as a MS Word doc here.

~*~

As you can see from these extensive reports, I have been working hard to uncover vital information on this critical National Security issue. All of this work is done independently and it is 100% reader-funded. If you appreciate my work and want to see more of it, now is the time to step up in support.
Very Grateful for all the much needed support,
~ David
Please forward this e-mail to friends >>
Social Media Links: Twitter | Facebook | Instagram
~*~
If you appreciate my work, please subscribe or make a one-time donation. Every dollar helps keep me reporting...
Here's a section of David's report:

Blow the whistle on fraud and the Defense Contract Audit Agency will accuse you of being a mentally ill terrorist.

When you look into Whistleblower cases, there are many reoccurring themes. To get a more in-depth understanding of what whistleblowers are up against, in one of the very rare cases when American taxpayers were able to get justice, Kirk McGill, who was a Senior Auditor for the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA), blew the whistle on a $433 million contract.
After spending over two years battling against many retaliation attacks, which led to his demotion, involuntary transfer, unpaid suspension, character assassination and eventual resignation, McGill summed up his nightmare in dealing with the DOD IG, the office that handles DOD whistleblower complaints, by saying:
  "A number of my colleagues and superiors told me that attempting to contact DOD IG as a whistleblower was futile, and they have been proven totally correct."
  "It is clear that DOD IG is either one of the most incompetent investigative agencies in the history of that profession, or is deliberately being obtuse."
  "As noted repeatedly, DOD IG was told in a disclosure that DCAA IRD [Internal Review Directorate] was compromised."
  "Yet, despite this fact, DOD IG continued to refer complaints to IRD as if nothing was wrong. In doing so, DOD IG handed the very people that were retaliating against me, related to the whistleblower disclosures, specific details of the allegations I was making against them."
  "Even Inspector Clouseau would recognize that something is wrong with this picture."
After the DOD IG referred McGill's case to the DCAA IRD, the DCAA IRD then engaged in a series of highly scandalous actions in attempts to discredit and silence McGill. They even falsely accused him of being a terrorist who wanted to blow up the Capitol Building, and they also made false accusations that he was mentally ill.
A Wikipedia page featuring information about McGill's case was vandalized and derogatory comments smearing his reputation were added to the website. The IP address that made those "edits" to the Wikipedia entry came from internal DCAA servers.
In addition to all of that, McGill's social media accounts were hacked.
Keep in mind, this all happened to a Senior DOD Auditor for the Defense Contract Audit Agency who was vindicated after multiple Congressional hearings.
As a military spending auditor, in this case alone, McGill saved American taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars, and this is how the DOD IG and Defense Contract Audit Agency, who oversee trillions of tax dollars, tried to silence him.
It took McGill over 10,000 hours of work, two trips to Washington D.C. and incredible personal costs — while under constant intimidation and retaliation attacks, which ultimately led to him resigning — to eventually get justice for American taxpayers.
How many people in the military have the time or money needed to pull that off?
McGill's heroic battle featured common obstacles that many DOD whistleblowers face. In a letter to Congress, McGill further highlighted the DOD IG's systemic failure to protect whistleblowers:
  "DOD IG closed this allegation without discussing the matter with me directly in any way. It then either closed or referred every complaint (with two exceptions) right back to DCAA-IRD.
  "I do not believe that any faith can be placed in DOD IG if it passes the buck to the very people accused of the misconduct in question, putting them on notice of exactly what they are accused of, and who did the accusing."
  "Frankly, DOD IG's conduct is, in and of itself, worthy of Congressional attention and possible action; no whistleblower with two brain cells to rub together would trust the DOD IG after this conduct, and that should seriously concern the Congress that relies on such whistleblowers to uncover Executive Branch misconduct."
Not surprisingly, with the DOD IG working in partnership with agencies and officials who are being accused of corruption and crimes, there are now a record number of whistleblowers who have been retaliated against and silenced.
~ This is an excerpt from my latest extensive report, which takes an in-depth look into critical systemic breakdowns throughout the whistleblowing process.
This excerpt was posted to Facebook here.

(Read Full Report Here)

~*~



Money for destruction but not to help people.


  1. We need a to take the trillions of dollars spent on regime change wars and the nuclear arms race and invest them to meet the needs of the American people. Otherwise, we can't even ensure our most vulnerable communities have clean water following a disaster.



In other developments . . .

The majority of Provincial Council members have voted for autonomy, head of the council revealed & adding that they also have sent an an official letter to PM Adil Abdul-Mahdi and the Independent High Electoral Commission for support.






The following sites updated:





  • Tuesday, April 2, 2019

    Time is up for Joe



    Former Vice President Joe Biden has now been accused by two women of making them uncomfortable with unwanted behavior, potentially creating a challenge for his 2020 campaign if he does make his widely anticipated entry into the presidential race. 
    Biden addressed the allegations in an interview on Sunday, saying that in his four decades as a politician he has "offered countless handshakes, hugs, expressions of affection, support and comfort" but that he doesn't think he ever "acted inappropriately."
    None of Biden's potential 2020 Democratic primary opponents have said the allegations should keep him out of the race but none of them have rushed to his defense either. But White House adviser Kellyanne Conway has already attacked him as "Creepy Uncle Joe" despite President Donald Trump's own history of alleged sexual misconduct. 

    Two more women have now come forward to share their groping stories bringing the total number to four -- thus far. 



    But all the above constitute a serious concern for Biden and his backers, because they highlight a fundamental vulnerability that will burden him if he makes another bid for the Oval Office.
    On the most obvious level, complaints of this kind renew the criticism of Biden's past performance on issues affecting women and people of color, the two constituencies likely to matter most in choosing the next Democratic nominee.
    But on a deeper level, these stories reinforce a perception of the 76-year-old Biden as an only partially reconstructed man of the last century – an embodiment of the attitudes of an earlier era. His basic vulnerability is being cast as a candidate of the past in a party selling itself as the party of the future.


    MEDIAITE notes that Tina Brown has stated, "There is a reason why this movement after #MeToo is called Time's Up.  There is a reason why he shouldn't run, really -- which is that it's not about this that he shouldn't run.  But it's because he's not nimlbe in the mores and the language of today.  And I think he's going to spend a lot of campaign apologizing for all kinds of things he did or didn't do."


    Like Tina Brown, I think time is up for Joe.


    This is C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"

     
    Tuesday, April 2, 2019.  Oh, Joe.  Another day of "Oh, Joe."  Can we really endure 19 months of "Oh, Joe" and still see Dems take back the White House?

    Yesterday, Neil Vigdor (HARTFORD COURANT) reported a second woman had come forward to state that former US Vice President Joe Biden had creeped her out with inappropriate behavior as well:

    A Connecticut woman says Joe Biden touched her inappropriately and rubbed noses with her during a 2009 political fundraiser in Greenwich when he was vice president, drawing further scrutiny to the Democrat and his history of unwanted contact with women as he ponders a presidential run

    "It wasn't sexual, but he did grab me by the head," Amy Lappos told The Courant Monday. "He put his hand around my neck and pulled me in to rub noses with me. When he was pulling me in, I thought he was going to kiss me on the mouth."
    Lappos posted about the alleged incident on the Facebook page of Connecticut Women in Politics Sunday in response to a similar account by former Nevada legislator Lucy Flores, which comes as Biden is considering a 2020 run for president. Flores accused Biden of kissing her on the back of her head in 2014, when she was a candidate for lieutenant governor.

    The response to Lucy Flores and Amy Lappos has been very telling.

    Meghan Weight Gain McCain wants you to know that Joe is wonderful, wonderful and nothing bad ever happened to her.  She reminds me a lot of Chastity Bono -- I'm talking the pre-Chaz days.  Chastity never did a damn thing but ride the family name -- just like Weight Gain McCain.  And Chastity also felt the need to weigh in, remember?  Mel Gibson was not homophobic, Chastity insisted even though everone knew Mel was homophobic.  How did Chastity know he wasn't?  Because he was never that way around her.

    In other words, while around the gay daughter of the legendary Cher, Mel Gibson was appropriate.  That proved only that he acknowledged some boundaries, not that he wasn't homophobic.

    Alyssa Milano, the ultimate fake ass, rushed forward to insist Joe never did anything to her.  Hey, Alyssa, Joe never did anything to me either.  Bob Filner never did anything inappropriate to me (though many other women can't say the same).  John Grabby Hands Edwards is the only one I can think of who did anything inappropriate to me -- politician wise, the most recent after him would be a TV star at the height of his TV fame who seemed to think he owned the world and anything -- or anyone -- in it.

    I've also seen some, no offense (well maybe a little offense intended), butt ugly women on Twitter -- especially a nurse -- who insist that Joe never did anything to him.  Joe's pattern, please remember, is attractive women.  If you're butt ugly, he didn't feel the need to nuzzle against you.

    Two women are sharing their truths.

    And the response?

    Well, there's Mika who flirted and f**ked her way to cohosting MORNING JOE who wants to know if she can discuss that one of the women supported Bernie Sanders in 2016?  Of course you can discuss that Mika and we can all discuss how you cheated on your husband to sleep with your equally married co-host and how trashy that was and remains.  We can also continue to discuss the betting pool on when you two split and how many other women Joe sleeps with in the meantime.

    I've seen some people on Twitter -- who I'm sure are well meaning (that's meant sincerely) -- who have wondered recently if Elizabeth Warren, as she pursues the party's presidential nomination will end up getting "the Hillary treatment."

    I'm sure they don't mean gushing press and Andrea Mitchell attempting to police her peers on the campaign.  That's 2016.

    I think the mean 2008.

    You can like Hillary Clinton personally or not but hopefully you can agree that what happened in 2008 should never have happened and never needs to happen to a woman again.  "Iron my shirts!"  She was heckled with that and people -- pundits and hosts on TV, especially MSNBC -- found that funny.  Nothing was too far for them to go.  They giggled over Hillary "nutcrackers."  They smeared her in every way possible.  They lied about her -- Bill Moyers, Jesse Jackson Jr. and Dr, Kathleen Hall Jamieson -- on PBS.  Click here for a 2008 look back at some of the sexism.  Grasp that while this took place, FAIR and its radio program COUNTERSPIN -- supposed media watchdogs -- ignored everything until Hillary was called a "bitch" on TV (on CNN) and then they quickly rushed over it not even identifying the person who had called her a bitch on air (here for Ava and I in real time).


    Again, you can like her or not, but hopefully you grasp that what was done to a woman in 2008 was unacceptable.  Some of us called it out in real time and that's why we always look puzzled when the 'brave' girls (girls, not women) emerged in 2016 to scream 'sexism!' at things that really weren't sexism and marveled over the fact that these middle-aged girls (Debra Messing, Patty Arquette, Alyssa, etc) didn't say s**t in 2008.

    Now two women are speaking and someone like Alyssa has the chance to make up for her hideous silence in 2008.  But she can't because she is hideous.  Remember, I supported Illeana Douglas when she told her story about Leslie Moonves.  Did you not notice that Alyssa never gave Illeana so much as a Tweet of support?  She never gave her any support.  Because Alyssa was trying to sell a show to a CBS property (THE CW) and she didn't think Leslie Moonves would be toppled so she was going to keep her mouth shut.  That passes for 'bravery' among the cowards.

    What's interesting is that the 'bros' -- men and women -- are back.  They're part of the laughable 'resistance.'  And they're trashing these two women who have come forward.  They were part of the trashing of Hillary in 2008.  They giggled over the attacks on Hillary and now they launch their own attacks.

    Two women say they were made uncomfortable by behavior that was clearly inappropriate.

    So they rush -- and Alyssa does this too -- to tell us that Joe meant no harm.

    I love Bob Filner.  When women came forward to talk about what he had done to them?  I didn't say, "Oh, he meant no harm!"  I didn't shove my nose into their conversation.  They had things they needed to air and they needed to discuss and they had every right to do so.

    Instead of letting the two women (and I think there will be a few more) discuss what happened to them and all of us addressing it on those terms, you've got the 'resistance' attacking them, laughing at them, mocking them.  I'm really bothered, for example, by a comedian who thinks he's sexy (he's really not) and thinks he can have an audience on the left while he mocks these women and makes light of what was done to them.

    No, it is not acceptable to go behind a woman, grab her and smell her hair.

    That's not professional and it's not acceptable.

    And women that Joe has done this too have every right to speak their truth and we long ago should have been addressing this.  Joe's intent doesn't matter.  And he did this as a high ranking US Senator and as the Vice President so, instead of mocking women, we should be discussing the power issues and how Joe's actions were seen publicly and ignored or made into jokes.

    It's inappropriate.

    One idiotic 'resistance' member hissed on Twitter that "no candidate will be perfect.''

    Joe's actions border on assault.  That's not an extreme read on it.  Women with less access to power were made uncomfortable by his refusal to honor accepted boundaries, by his invasion of their space and by his hands on their body.  That's assault, I'm sorry if the law wasn't taught at your community college.  For those of us who studied the law, however, it's very clear that what Joe did was assault.

    And wanting a candidate who didn't assault someone is very different from wanting someone who is "perfect."

    And if you're a Joe supporter, you should especially close your mouth right now.  You need to see if he has the strength to address this in such a way to silence it because, if he doesn't, it is going to be an issue later in any campaign.

    'Well Trump's a pig so it will be a battle between two pigs!'

    Well 2015 was The Year of the Ass and, in 2016, when voters were forced to choose between two asses, they went with Trump.

    Joe Biden needs to address his actions.

    He was perfectly comfortable doing what he did in public.  He should be able to talk about it.  And when one of his sons was publicly humiliated, I weighed in here (I know Joe and, yes, I like Joe) noting that we all fall down but the test is how we dust ourselves off and get back on our feet.  Joe later echoed that (which is fine, I'd said to him personally and not just posted it here).  Okay, Joe, put those words into practice.  Do what you said your son needed to.  And if you can't, you should not be running.

    I'm bothered by so much of the way this dialogue is taking place.  That includes trying to reduce this to a 'woman's issue.'  Oh, he groped but he did this for women so it's okay -- that seems to be a talking point.  No, it's not okay.  More to the point, this is a conversation about power.  And women often do not have the power so it's very easy to make this a gendered conversation.

    However, on two campuses yesterday discussing Iraq, this issue kept coming up.  It's not a gendered issue.  Not by the comments I heard.  It's an issue about the abuse of power and there are women and men who have experienced and/or observed that type of issue.


    Joe voted for the Iraq War.  He was also over Iraq for the administration when ISIS rose in that country.  Barack couldn't put Hillary in charge because she'd rightly called Nouri al-Maliki a "thug" in a public Senate hearing in April of 2008.  Nouri was a thug.  He was also prime minister of Iraq.  So, once he was elected, Barack couldn't put Hillary in charge of Iraq and instead went with Joe.  Joe's actions as vice president including selling the overthrow of the 2010 election (Nouri lost but Joe advocated for him to remain prime minister).  Joe supported the corrupt regime of Nouri al-Maliki, someone who terrorized the people of Iraq while stealing their money.  Corruption is epidemic in Iraq.

    Ammar Karim (AFP) explains:


    Nationwide horror over the March 21 capsizing of the overloaded riverboat in the northern city of Mosul, which claimed 100 lives, mostly of women and children, has given way to a clamour for provincial officials to be put on trial.
    Graft is endemic across Iraq, not only in the city the Islamic State group controlled for three years before their expulsion in July 2017.
    The country ranks among the world's worst offenders in Transparency International's annual Corruption Perceptions Index.
    Since 2004, a year after the US-led invasion that ousted Saddam Hussein, a total of $218 billion has vanished into the pockets of shady politicians and businessmen, according to parliament.
    That is more than Iraq's GDP.
    Few officials have been brought to account, and amnesties have allowed many to evade justice, only partially repaying the stolen funds.
    For the past week, the cry of "corruption is killing us" has been ringing across Mosul.

    & I seem 2 agree on many things re#Iraq.In his latest article on ferry, he writes in Arabic what may roughly translate to, "removing 1 or more officials frm power will yield zero change in the wider corruption network involving both militias and politicians"
     
     


    Fear of corruption disrupts the reconstruction of liberated cities, and influential investors take advantage of the opportunity, by
     
     


    Quotations : The occupation of Iraq produced a distorted political process, marked by corruption and sectarianism.
     
     


    ISIS is not gone in Iraq.  They have morphed and will continue to morph. Saturday, NPR's MORNING EDITION featured a conversation about Iraq:

    KORVA COLEMAN, HOST:
    Last week, President Trump and Syrian democratic forces claimed victory over Islamic State in Syria. But what exactly does that mean? Syria's neighbor, Iraq, may provide some answers. Victory over ISIS was declared there in 2017 after U.S.-backed forces regained control of Mosul. Mara Redlich Revkin, a fellow at Yale Law School's Center for Global Legal Challenges, has spent a lot of time there. She says life after ISIS involves a lot of criminal trials against people suspected of joining or aiding the group. She's witnessed some trials.
    Revkin told me about a man named Khaled. He worked at a slaughterhouse that ISIS took control of, leaving him with a choice - stay at the job and work for ISIS or leave and face retaliation.
    MARA REDLICH REVKIN: Khaled, like many residents of Mosul, decided that cooperation was the only way to survive. So he continued working in the slaughterhouse. He claimed that he was never trained. He never received combat training or used a weapon or participated in any military operations on behalf of the group. But nonetheless, three years later, when Iraqi security forces, supported by the international coalition, recaptured Mosul, he was 1 of more than 90,000 people who have been detained on suspicion of association with the group. And he was arrested solely on the basis of testimony from a secret informant who had apparently witnessed him pledging allegiance, even though Khaled insisted that this pledge was involuntary and coerced.
    So, you know, during the trial, I saw him explain that his work consisted only of feeding and caring for animals at the slaughterhouse. But nonetheless, he was sentenced to 15 years in prison after a trial that lasted less than 30 minutes. And the judges actually told him that he was lucky to receive such a lenient sentence because the crime for which he was convicted, which was membership in a terrorist group, generally brings capital punishment.
    COLEMAN: A lot of post-ISIS life is figuring out who was or who was not involved in ISIS and bringing the appropriate perpetrators to justice. This is done mostly through courts?
    REVKIN: Yes, it is. And it's happening both in federal Iraq and in the Kurdish region. The primary legal instrument for a prosecution is the 2005 anti-terrorism law which is very harsh and also very quite vaguely worded. So Article 4 requires the death penalty for anyone who has, quote, "committed, incited, planned, financed or assisted a terror act" - and a life sentence for anyone who covers up such an act or harbors those who perpetrated it. And the harboring language is particularly important because this has been used as justification to prosecute a lot of family members of alleged Islamic State affiliates.
    So if you are the wife or child or a mother or father of an Islamic State fighter and living in the same house as that person, does that mean harboring? I think a lot of courts and Iraqi judges I've talked to would say yes. Another element of this law is the definition of a terrorist under Article 2 as anyone who has organized, chaired or participated in an armed terrorist gang.
    And a word like participation is just so incredibly broad. And when you think about what that means in the context of a place like Mosul, where the Islamic State controlled the entire economy, had a monopoly on violence and then was also controlling borders and entry and exit, does it mean that anyone paying taxes there was participating? Or if you sold food to an Islamic State fighter, did that make you a participant and therefore a terrorist?

    Corruption and ISIS are linked.  It's one of the issues, corruption, that gave rise to ISIS in Iraq.  An unresponsive government attacks its own citizens and ISIS rises in Iraq.

    Barack may think his refusing to take Nouri's post-2012 election congratulatory phone call (he fobbed the call of on Joe Biden, refusing to speak to Nouri himself) was some sort of punishment but it wasn't.  His embrace of Nouri in 2010 set the stage for the rise of ISIS.  And that's something a candidate Joe Biden will have to answer for.



    New




    The following sites updated: