Tuesday, July 31, 2018

It's deep

  1. IF THIS TAPED 1963 PHONE CONVERSATION BETWEEN RFK AND LBJ DOESN'T CONVINCE YOU THAT THERE IS A DEEP STATE AND IT IS CENTURIES OLD, NOTHING WILL.
    0:35
    28K views


This is C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"

 
Monday, July 30, 2018.  Weeks later and still no government in Iraq.  What's the hold up?


is like Abadis pants, once the belt is broken there is no chance of holding it together.





As July turns into August this week, it's worth noting that Iraq has still not formed a new government.




May 12th, Iraq held national elections.  Ahead of the elections, there had been big hopes -- these hopes included a large turnout.   Ali Jawad (ANADOLU AGENCY) noted, "A total of 24 million Iraqis are eligible to cast their ballots to elect members of parliament, who will in turn elect the Iraqi president and prime minister."  RUDAW added, "Around 7,000 candidates have registered to stand in the May 12 poll, with 329 parliamentary seats up for grabs."  AFP explained that the nearly 7,000 candidates includes 2014 women.  THE SIASAT DAILY added, of the nearly 7,000 candidates, "According to the electoral commission, only 20 percent of the candidates are newcomers." Ali Abdul-Hassan and Sinan Salaheddin (AP) reported, "Iraqi women account for 57 percent of Iraq’s population of over 37 million, according to the U.N. Development Program, and despite government efforts to address gender inequality, the situation for Iraqi women has declined steadily since 2003.  According to the UNDP, one in every 10 Iraqi households is headed by a widow. In recent years, Iraqi women suffered further economic, social and political marginalization due to decades of wars, conflict, violence and sanctions." 


The other big hope?  For the US government, the biggest hope was that Hayder al-Abadi's bloc would come in first so that he would have a second term as prime minister.  It was not to be.  Mustapha Karkouti (GULF NEWS) identifies the key issues as follows, "Like in previous elections, the main concerns of ordinary Iraqis continue to be the lack of security and the rampant corruption."

As we noted the day of the election:

Corruption is a key issue and it was not a topic explored by candidates outside of Moqtada al-Sadr's coalition.  Empty lip service was offered.  Hayder al-Abadi, current prime minister, had been offering empty lip service for four years.  He did nothing.  Iraqis were supposed to think that, for example, Hayder's focus on ISIS in Mosul mattered.  All life was supposed to stop because of Mosul?  All expectations were to be ignored because of Mosul?

Arabic social media today and yesterday was full of comments about the lack of improvement in services.  It noted how the elections had not mattered before and, yes, how in 2010 the US government overturned the elections because they didn't like the outcome. 



So it was probably only surprising to the US government and their press hacks that Hayder wouldn't come in first.  But that was after the votes were counted.  On the day of the election, the big news was how so few were turning out to vote.  NPR reported, "With more than 90 percent of the votes in, Iraq's election commission announced voter turnout of 44.5 percent. The figure is down sharply from 60 percent of eligible voters who cast their ballots in the last elections in 2014." AP pointed out the obvious, "No election since 2003 saw turnout below 60 percent."  AFP broke it down even more clearly "More than half of the nearly 24.5 million voters did not show up at the ballot box in the parliamentary election, the highest abstention rate since the first multiparty elections in 2005 [. . .]."



Elections held May 12th.  August arrives this week but it comes in the door with no new government to welcome in Iraq yet.


Arrived in tonight for talks with PM Abadi and other leaders on our common fight against , protection of Iraq’s borders, and economic reforms supported by our Strategic Framework Agreement.





Really?  Is that what you're doing, Brett?  Because that's not what others are saying.  For example, MIDDLE EAST MONITOR quotes the outgoing Speaker of Parliament Salem al-Jubouri on the matter:


In remarks to the Anadolu Agency, Al-Jubouri’s adviser Abdul-Malik Al-Hosseini said: “The former parliament speaker met on Sunday in Baghdad with the US Special Presidential Envoy for the Global Coalition to Defeat [the Islamic State] and discussed the Iraqi parties’ efforts to form a new government and the importance of reaching a common vision among all political blocs.”
Al-Hosseini added that “the global coalition and the United States want the political blocs to accelerate resolving the issue of forming the new government in order to start dealing with the issues of stability and reconstruction.”


Brett, for those who have forgotten or never knew, was sent to Iraq by Barack Obama in the summer of 2010.  Why was that?  They'd held elections in March of 2010.  And thug Nouri al-Maliki had lost but refused to step down.  Instead of negotiating for Nouri to step aside, Brett oversaw the negotiations for The Erbil Agreement, the US contract that overturned the 2010 election results and gave Nouri a second term.   Human rights monster Samantha Power, among others in the administration, insisted that Nouri -- despite his thuggish ways and secret prisons and jails where torture was taking place -- had to have a second term.

Is that what Brett's again working on?  Overturning the votes of the Iraqi people?

In Iraq, protests continue.


On Saturday, Hayder al-Abadi attempted a cosmetic change by firing five election officials.  It was not addressing corruption.  So Sunday he made the following announcement:





PM orders the suspension of the Minister of Electricity due to poor performance of the sector. The is taking action to immediately improve the supply of electricity across Iraq


Suspended is not fired.  More to the point, the Cabinet is for the previous government.  There's no new Cabinet yet (still?).

Hundreds of protesters have been arrested, hundreds have been injured, at least 14 have been killed and at least one has been fired.


Introduction An economic bulletin in alIraqi channel was fired from the job because of its participation in the protests






RUDAW reports on Hannah Mahdi:

She added that the head of the news section had summoned her days before she was fired, asking her to back away from protests because there were infiltrators.

“But I said that wasn’t true. Throughout my participation in the protestors at Tahrir Square, I encountered no one but simple people demanding their legitimate demands,” Mahdi said.

She says she was told she would face consequences if she didn’t back down. Since, she has worked as a freelancer with the network.

She says her termination letter had been prepared, but was shredded as the network couldn’t deal with the pressure from her supporters. She adds she hasn’t been paid for previous work by the network.



Let's turn to the stupid.


OBAMA DID THIS : Repaired our crippled Economy , saved our car industry , Got OUR SOLDIERS OUT OF IRAQ , Got Osama Bin Laden , Got heath insurance for millions of people that didn't have it before , put in regulations to stop wall street from gambling with our money AGAIN . OBAMA




Donald Whittler is the village idiot of Jefferson City.  Our focus is Iraq so that's what we'll focus on.  Barack "Got OUR SOLIDERS OUT OF IRAQ"?

Really?



A 40-mm grenade explodes in a cave entrance during a joint operation to clear an ISIS safe haven in Iraq's Makhmour Mountains on July 16, 2018. (Photo by U.S. Army Sgt. 1st Class Russell Gilchrest.)





Looks like US soldiers in that US military photo that the STARS AND STRIPES reported Tweeted above.  Dropping back to Friday's snapshot:


Today, some say the Iraq War is over.  It's not.  Some fools claim Barack Obama ended it. Yeah, and he closed Guantanamo Bay too.  (He didn't -- Iraq and Gitmo, just two of his many broken promises.  And, spoiler, he didn't end veterans homelessness either despite promising to do so.)
Kevin E. Schmidt (QUAD CITY TIMES) reports:



Although victory over ISIS has been declared in Iraq, American involvement there will remain necessary for years to come, according to Sen. Joni Ernst, because the United States cannot win the peace for the Middle East nation on its own.
“This is going to take a long time,” the first-term Republican senator said. “We’ve been there 15 years. We have a long ways to go yet. The United States must remain a partner of choice for Iraq as it develops into a young democracy.”
So until the United States is confident in the capacity and ability of Iraqi security forces to defend their country, a U.S. military presence will remain necessary to protect American interests, the Iraq War veteran told the United States Institute of Peace on Thursday in Washington, D.C.


 Village idiot Donald believes no US troops are in Iraq.  Is his stupidity an educational failing or a media failing?

Let's note more stupidity:

Since the trump election: Number of times Trump has visited the troops in Iraq and Afghanistan: 0 Number of days spent at a Trump golf course: 177 and counting.





How many times did President Barack Obama visit Iraq?

Once.

Only once.

In two terms as president, eight years, he visited Iraq once.

You're not a Voice of Reason, you're a liar trying to deceive.  And you didn't give a damn how many rounds of golf Barack played so shut your lying mouth.  Shame on anyone who takes this sort of nonsense seriously.


Friday, July 27, 2018

Real issues versus the circus

I did not vote for Donald Trump.  I do feel sick to my stomach by what the media is doing.

  Retweeted
Media gaslight Americans about whether domestic spying on political opponents is normal, defensible, or appropriate. Yes, the facts are damaging for the "treasonous collusion" information operation they swallowed whole. But that's no excuse.



It is not fair.  We are taught that it is important to be fair.  If my boys said, "Mom, that's not fair!"  I would think about it and try to figure out if it was fair or how it was fair.  Now if they said, "Mom, why do I have to do that?" -- I would just say, "Because I said so and I am your mother."

But play the fair card and I will give it thought because it is important to be fair.

In the United States, we are told we have an equal playing field.

Now that is about as real as Santa Claus (I hope I did not upset anyone with that revelation about Santa).

But though we are far from fair in our land, in our courts, in our housing even, in everything, fair is what we are supposed to strive for.

And there is no fairness in the media running with one rumor after another and treating them all as fact even though they cannot be backed up.

If Abraham Lincoln went through this same treatment, I believe he would have been destroyed long before he decided to go see that unfortunate play.

I believe in fairness.

I call President Trump out for many things.  But these are things he did or things that he oversees.

These rumors and all this garbage?

It honestly ticks me off because I am trying to deal with real issues and instead conspiracy nuts in the corporate media are spreading lies that distract us from the real issues -- like wars, immigration, etc.

This is C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"



Friday, July 27, 2018.





My name is Penny Evans and I've just gone twenty-one
A young widow in the war that's being fought in Vietnam
And I have two infant daughters, I thank God I have no sons
Now they say the war is over but I think it's just begun




Today, some say the Iraq War is over.  It's not.  Some fools claim Barack Obama ended it. Yeah, and he closed Guantanamo Bay too.  (He didn't -- Iraq and Gitmo, just two of his many broken promises.  And, spoiler, he didn't end veterans homelessness either despite promising to do so.)

Kevin E. Schmidt (QUAD CITY TIMES) reports:


Although victory over ISIS has been declared in Iraq, American involvement there will remain necessary for years to come, according to Sen. Joni Ernst, because the United States cannot win the peace for the Middle East nation on its own.
“This is going to take a long time,” the first-term Republican senator said. “We’ve been there 15 years. We have a long ways to go yet. The United States must remain a partner of choice for Iraq as it develops into a young democracy.”
So until the United States is confident in the capacity and ability of Iraqi security forces to defend their country, a U.S. military presence will remain necessary to protect American interests, the Iraq War veteran told the United States Institute of Peace on Thursday in Washington, D.C.



And in a similar development, Tuesday Brigadier General Frederic Parisot held a press briefing in Baghdad and insisted "the Iraqi Security Forces continue to secure the country in order to prevent the resurgence of " ISIS.

They haven't done a very good job of that.  First, ISIS never left, it lost control of some cities but a terrorist organization doens't traditionally rule.  In terms of its primary goal (terrorism), ISIS has not been defeated and  has continued to terrorize Iraq.

Martin Jay (RT) observes:

After about three years of ISIS controlling almost a third of the country, Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi declared victory in December 2017 against the terrorist group, as well as declaring that the war was over. Analysts though, at the time, warned that many extremists had merely gone underground or had scattered, and would return. These warnings were not taken seriously, but in recent weeks, Western journalists in Iraq are reporting an alarming return to the battlefield, which is going to give Trump a number of sleepless nights, wrangling over a conundrum he alone is unlikely to resolve.
According to the Washington Post, the battle has shifted into a central zone of Iraq with ISIS now adopting more nefarious, if not theatrical, tactics, leaving many civilians saying that the declaration of victory was premature.
Over the past two months, dozens of people, including local government officials, tribal elders, and village chiefs, have been abducted and killed or ransomed by fighters claiming affiliation with the Islamic State,” the paper claimed recently. “Electricity infrastructure and oil pipelines have been blown up. Armed men dressed as security forces and manning fake checkpoints have hijacked trucks and robbed travellers, rendering the main Baghdad-Kirkuk highway unsafe for a period of weeks.
It’s a horrendous account of Iraq today, with ISIS adapting to new surroundings, and according to the Post, using more and more local people to help with their heinous work. The speed also is worrying some.


So the US leaves when?  According to Senator Ernst not for years.  According to Gen Parisot, not until ISIS is defeated.

The US war in Iraq continues.  Back to Parisot in Baghdad Tuesday:



Q:  Hi, sir.  Tara Copp, Military Times.

A few minutes ago you said whatever the price, you'll continue to fight until [ISIS] is defeated.  Could you define for us when will you know that ISIS is defeated?  What signs are you looking for to be able to then withdraw, stop providing the military support for this operation?

GEN. PARISOT:  Well, now we're still engaged in major combat operations.  And I won't -- I can't speculate, on when it's going to end.

We provide, you know, the best military advice for the political level, but basically, you know, as long as there is a military mission, I guess we are going to stay.



He can't speculate on when that's going to end.  He can't even say what signs would demonstrate success.
"This is going to take a long time."  John McCain was savaged in 2008 for such comments.  Today?  They probably won't even be reported or repeated by most.  "We have a long ways to go yet."

Why?

Because we won't allow the Iraqis to have self-rule.  We impose leaders on them.  They are an undeclared colony.  The US government and the Iranian government try to control Iraq.  Do you really think that, if Iraq had self-rule, they would repeatedly choose one person after another to be prime minister -- one person after another who fled Iraq and lived outside the country for decades?

Chickens who fled are suddenly going to make strong leaders?

Of course not, which is why the US keeps installing them.  Bully Boy Bush installed Nouri al-Maliki (based on the CIA profile that found Nouri to be extremely paranoid), in 2010 when Nouri lost re-election Barack Obama gave him a second term via The Erbil Agreement, 2014 is when Barack replaces him with Hayder al-Abadi.  Weak leaders who were chosen because they are weak.

And what do weak men do?  Lash out.  Thug Nouri made clear he was a thug in his first term.  It's been obvious that Hayder is a little thug himself though the western press has largely ignored it until Hayder's attacks on the protester this month.

Tom O'Connor (NEWSWEEK) reports: the US government admitted Thursday to killing at least 1,000 civilians in Iraq and Syria via bombings.  When US war planes are dropping bombs, reminder, that's a war.

And not only has ISIS not been defeated but it still holds territory in Iraq.  Despite Hayder al-Abadi claiming it was defeated -- even as he claimed that -- ISIS still held (and still holds) territory in Iraq.

Hayder al-Abadi wants a second term as prime minister.  The US government wants that too.

Will they get their way?

REUTERS reports:

Iraq's top Shiite cleric Grand Ayatollah Ali Al-Sistani called for a government to be formed as soon as possible to tackle corruption and poor basic services.
In a Friday sermon delivered by a representative, Al-Sistani also encouraged the incumbent government of Prime Minister Haider Al-Abadi to respond urgently to protesters' demands seeking better basic services and jobs.
"The current government must work hard urgently to implement citizens' demands to reduce their suffering and misery," Al-Sistani's representative said in the Shiite holy city of Kerbala.
Anger is mounting at a time when politicians are struggling to form a government after the May 12 election, which was marred by allegations of fraud that prompted a recount.




The elections were in May.  Next week July turns to August.  Still no prime minister-designate.  In 2010, Iraq went eight months before forming a government.  The way it is supposed to work is that elections are followed by the new Parliament meeting days after the ballots are counted and then they nominated a prime minister-designate (who then has 30 days to put together a cabinet or else the Parliament can name someone new).

Nothing is working in Iraq.  A lot of this dysfunction appears to have been designed by the US government.



If you are wondering why members of both parties just passed the largest defense budget since the height of the Iraq War, consider that much of it goes to defense contractors that spent $69 million lobbying Congress in 2017.





The dysfunction has been hugely profitable for many.  Planned dysfunction?



The following community sites updated: