FBI agents raided the Maryland home of John Bolton, the former national security advisor to President Donald Trump.
The
raid is part of a "national security investigation in search of
classified records," a person familiar with the matter told NBC News.
Bolton
has become a staunch critic of Trump, who called him "stupid" recently
after criticizing the president's meeting on the Ukraine war with
Russia's leader, Vladimir Putin.
This is appalling. And I am no fan of Mr. Bolton. Here are some comments on the NBC NEWS article:
jack 76
2 hours ago
We
need to pay attention, bit-by-bit, we are witnessing American justice
being destroyed. No question this was political. So, where is the proof
or even accusation that Bolton had classified files? Bolton has not been
a part of the government for over 7 years. This is Trump carrying out
his hit list of people who speak out against him.
john davis
2 hours ago
Trump ordering these unlawful raids is disturbing.
Bolton has been a stand-up TRUE patriot to our country & has served several presidents.
This abuse of POWER is rally becoming TREASON -AGAIN!!
N D
13 minutes ago
The
FBI knows exactly who stole and leaked our classified documents -
Donald Trump, as a private citizen as well as a sitting president, stole
and leaked classified documents to news media, our adversaries, his
employees, friends, family. He had enough puppets in the right places,
like judges, etc. that he could bribe to do his bidding so he wasn't
tried, convicted, imprisoned as he should have been.
The
people of the United States will have their revenge on Trump and his
puppets, just has he is wreaking revenge on his perceived enemies, in
due time. Karma, Karma, Karma
S. Mays
2 hours ago
Trump
accused Democrats of weaponizing the government with zero proof.
Meanwhile, he has weaponized the government. Every accusation is a
confession with this guy.
Scooter Macgrooter
12 minutes ago
It's
getting to the point where anyone who says anything bad about the
president gets tapped. I know someone who got hung up at the airport,
harassed and manhandled. Turns out he was posting 'anti-Trump" stuff on
line.
Donald Karl Walker
2 hours ago
Gee
and I thought Trump wasn't going to weaponize the DOJ or the FBI.
Someone explain to me how this is not Trump going after someone who
opposes or criticizes him?
gts
1 hour ago
If
he has any classified documents in his home, then this should be
happening. I'm all for "nobody is above the law." I'm just wondering
if Patel and Bondi had the same thoughts about Trump having classified
materials at Mar-a-Lago?
Phil Petree
2 hours ago
1) Bolton speaks out against Trump and says Trump is unprepared because Trump refuses to take the briefings.
2) FBI raids Bolton home.
3) FBI says they're looking for classified documents (you know, that very thing Trump railed against at Mara Lardo).
4) MAGA still can't see what's happening.
Laura Seifred
1 hour ago
Yes,
they raided his home because he wrote a book about the insanity and
chaos of the first Trump administration. It's laughable that this
administration is concerned about classified documents being housed in
an unsecured location, as Trump did the same with no repercussions.
Defense
attorney Joey Jackson, speaking on CNN at the time of the raid, said
the raid dredged up a number of disturbing questions considering the
retaliatory nature of President Donald Trump.
“This
is a person … that had a security clearance pulled [by the Trump
administration]. He had his security detail pulled. He's adverse to the
president. What world are we living in now again? Best case scenario,
this is the Department of Justice doing their job.”
But
Jackson said Trump is a vengeful president who likes to pull the levers
of government to hurt his perceived enemies, and Bolton — a former
Trump advisor — has criticized Trump on national television and in
writing.
“Worst case scenario: this is
political retribution,” said Jackson. “And if his attorney in front of
the cameras, I'm going to say so. Everybody who criticizes the
president, if you do it publicly, he's going to tweet about it, and then
you're going to get your house raided.”
Again,
I am really feeling what Mike wrote last night. It is enough. It is
more than enough. We have no grown ups in this administration. We
desperately need some.
No doubt that the raid on Mr. Bolton was an attempt to distract from the Epstein scandal. That will not work.
Friday, August 22, 2025. Chump's destruction of the economy
continues with attacks on tourism, groceries and US auto yet he still
manages to make time to also try to destroy veterans. He himself
continues to be destroyed by the Epstein scandal.
Earlier
this year, when President Donald Trump issued an executive order that
expelled transgender troops from the U.S. military, the administration
claimed—against all evidence—that bigotry against trans people was not
the reason behind the move. There’s no longer any plausible deniability,
though, as Trump’s Defense Department recently escalated its war on
trans service members by taking away some of those soldiers’ pensions
and benefits.
Transgender
troops began serving openly in 2016 under President Barack Obama. In
his first term, Trump announced by tweet that he would ban transgender
troops. A few months later, the Defense Department decided to bar them
from enlisting, but to retain those already in uniform, citing “its
solemn promise to these Service members, and the investment it has made
in them.” President Joe Biden again allowed transgender recruits to
join. But now Trump has decided to throw out all trans soldiers, even
though in the interim they have been serving honorably and successfully.
(If there were any evidence to the contrary the administration would
have produced it.)
Air Force Master Sgt. Logan
Ireland has served for 15 years, including overseas tours to
Afghanistan, the United Arab Emirates, and South Korea. After the
Supreme Court decided to allow the Trump administration to enforce its
ban, Ireland agreed to apply for early retirement; he was told that if
he didn’t, he would lose half of his separation pay. His application was
approved.
But then the Air
Force’s acting personnel chief decided to rescind the approval for
Ireland and more than a dozen others who have between 14 and 18 years of
Air Force service. Instead of normal retirement benefits, they are now
offered lump-sum payments worth hundreds of thousands of dollars less.
There was no explanation.
“The first feeling I
felt was betrayal,” Ireland said. “I’ve given my life to the service. I
was promised this. I had my retirement orders in hand. I’ve been
starting to process what life looks like outside of uniform, and now we
don’t know what that looks like.”
The Veterans
Administration’s declared mission is “to fulfill President Lincoln’s
promise to care for those who have served in our nation’s military and
for their families, caregivers, and survivors.” But now earnings from
years of service are yanked away at the whim of a bureaucrat.
This
is outrageous and would only come from a coward who, while his country
was at war, refused to serve. Now I am not rah-rah war. I support war
resisters. But Chump did not do that. He didn't protest the war. He
didn't do a damn thing but claim he couldn't serve because of bone
spurs. Those bone spurs have not prevented from golfing every weekend
of this year, have they? He lied. He has no respect for those who
serve. Transgender troops above, but it's really all the troops that he
hates and disrespects. If you doubt that reality, read this press
release that the Center for Constitutional Rights issued at the start of this month:
Today, the Department of Veteran’s Affairs (VA) announced plans to no longer allow
veterans to access abortion care or counseling through the VA health
system, specifically including in instances of rape, incest, or to save
the health of the pregnant person. While veterans were previously
allowed to access abortion care in specific circumstances, this policy
eliminates those exceptions apart from a narrow exception to save the
life of a pregnant veteran. These kinds of exceptions to save a person’s
life often don’t work in reality.
This proposed rule change will apply to veterans receiving care through the VA living in all 50 states, including the 14 states
with constitutional protections for abortion rights. This new policy
would be one of the strictest abortion bans in the country, and for
veterans living in the 12 states that ban abortion, it would further close off what may be their only opportunity to access urgently needed abortion care.
As a proposed rule, the policy will be open for public comment for 30
days, after which the administration will finalize the rule. Throughout
this next month, the public — including health experts and veterans —
can provide feedback on how this policy will endanger the health and
lives of veterans.
“After veterans put their lives on the line to protect our freedoms,
the Trump administration is trying to rob them of their own freedoms and
putting their health at risk,” said Nancy Northup, President and CEO at the Center for Reproductive Rights.
“This administration is sending a clear message to veterans—that their
health and dignity aren’t worth defending. To devalue veterans in this
way and take away life-changing health care would be unconscionable.
This shows you just how extreme this administration’s anti-abortion
stance is—they would rather a veteran suffer severely than receive an
abortion.”
This rule change was ushered through by the White House Office of Management & Budget Director Russell Vought and Secretary of Veterans Affairs Doug Collins—both adamantly anti-abortion—with Vought even opposing abortion
if it is needed to save the life of a pregnant person. This marks the
first major regulatory action by this administration to proactively take
away abortion rights from a group of people nationwide, and a
foreboding encroachment into states where abortion rights are protected.
Women are currently the fastest growing population of veterans, and
removing these exceptions to the VA’s strict abortion ban will be
devastating for pregnant veterans who need access to this care. More
than two million women veterans live in the U.S. today, and more than 400,000 women veterans
are estimated to live in states with total abortion bans or severe
restrictions, meaning they may not be able to access abortion care—in
case of emergency care or otherwise—at all. There are also thousands of transgender men as well as non-binary veterans who might need abortion care. Additionally, over 700,000 family members of veterans get their care from the VA.
The removal of the health, rape, and incest exceptions are
particularly dangerous given the high rates of sexual assault in the
military. One in three
women veterans experienced military sexual trauma (MST), including
sexual assault, during their military service, and research indicates
that nearly 40% of homeless women veterans experienced MST while in the service. Many veterans also experience severe post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD),
including from experiences related to sexual assault, and an unplanned
pregnancy may exacerbate their PTSD and require abortion access to
preserve their health or life. Last year, enrollment of women veterans
in VA health care increased in every state,
and four of the six most concentrated states were Texas, Florida,
Georgia, and North Carolina—all states with severe abortion bans.
In 2022, immediately after the Dobbs decision overturned federal abortion protections under Roe v. Wade,
the Biden-Harris Administration carved out exceptions to the VA’s
complete abortion ban in certain situations. That rule also allowed VA
clinicians to discuss abortion options or referrals with patients for
the first time, a conversation that will be prohibited if the rule is
finalized.
Pregnancy complications are not uncommon and it’s critical that
everyone, regardless of pregnancy intentions or circumstances, be able
to access the full range of reproductive health care services including
abortion. Each year in the United States, about 700 people die during
pregnancy or in the year after, and another 50,000 people each year have
unexpected outcomes of labor and delivery with serious short- or
long-term health consequences.
Bone spurs claimed this week to be a war hero -- see Marcia's "Chump should be charged with stolen valor"
-- he's not. He never served. So he lies to promote himself and build
himself up but the reality is he has no respect for those who have
served in the military.
When you make a promise, you
honor that promise. I've said this over and over here every year that
we've been online -- almost 21 years now -- you don't screw around with
veterans benefits. You have made a promise to them and you damn well
better honor it.
Donald doesn't believe that. He not
only kicked out trans members, he wants to destroy their pensions.
That's what he's doing. He's telling women that they don't have
reproductive care -- Translations, "Go fight for freedom but grasp that
you don't have reproductive freedom." His horrendous DOGE has destroyed
jobs for so many veterans. There is no veterans issue you can point to
where he hasn't harmed them. How about the VA? MSNBC from a little
over a week ago.
The
government made promises and it is failing to deliver because of Donald
Chump. This isn't an accident, it is planned. He has planned to
betray veterans and he has done so.
He is a failure and
a liar. And he has broken one of the core promises our government has
with our veterans. There is no excuse for that.
We
have repeatedly called out various politicians (Wig hatted Corrine
Brown, Jim Webb, go down the list -- and the two named are both
Democrats) over the years for their betrayals of veterans but I don't
think anyone we've ever called out has done as much damage -- and
intentionally done as much damage -- as Donald Chump.
Canadian
tourism to the United States is collapsing in the wake of President
Donald Trump’s return to the White House, according to a new report, a
find that comes after the U.S. president has imposed tariffs on and
threatened to annex America’s northern neighbor.
The
report, published by Statistics Canada, a government office, shows that
Canadians made 1.7 million return trips by motor vehicle back into
their country from the U.S. in July. That amounts to a 37% drop from
July 2024.
[. . .]
The
decline in travel translates to a loss of billions of dollars in
tourism-related revenue. With 20.4 million visits to the United States
in 2024, Canadian tourism accounted for $20.5 billion in revenue and
helped to support approximately 140,000 U.S. jobs, the U.S. Travel
Association said in February.
The association,
at the time, noted that a 10% decrease in Canadian travel “could mean
2.0 million fewer visits, $2.1 billion in lost spending and 14,000 job
losses.”
We've noted the hit that
Chump was causing the economy as a result of his repugnant personality
and policies. People don't want to come to a country where they might be
arrested and sent off to El Salvador or Guantanamo. People don't want
to come to a country run by a hate monger. Danielle Antosz (MONEY WISE) reported this week:
While tourism is booming in many countries, the U.S. is falling behind. A recent report by the World Travel & Tourism Council
(WTTC) found that the U.S. is the only country forecasted to see a
decline in international visitor spending in 2025. In March,
international travel to the U.S. fell 14% compared with the same period
last year, according to the U.S. Travel Association.
Tourism
from Canada has had the sharpest decline — Canadian visits in May
decreased by 38% by car and 24% by air compared to the same month in
2024, according to the U.S. National Travel and Tourism Office (NTTO).
Travel from Western Europe is also declining, falling nearly 5% in 2025.
“While
other nations are rolling out the welcome mat, the U.S. government is
putting up the ‘closed’ sign,” said Julia Simpson, president and CEO of
WTTC.
And the price tag is staggering. In total, this decrease in tourism
could cost the United States an estimated $29 billion, and experts warn
that number could grow if policies don’t change.
In addition to the travel aspect, Gabriela León reports more damage that Chump has done:
In
June, a significant shift occurred in the North American auto market:
for the first time since the early 1990s, Canada imported more vehicles
from Mexico than from the United States. According to Statistics Canada
data reported by Bloomberg, this development marks a dramatic change in a
market where Canada has traditionally been the top customer for
American automakers. The shift underscores the impact of trade policies
on longstanding economic relationships.
The
primary catalyst for this historic change is the 25% tariff on foreign
vehicles imposed by President Donald Trump. This policy aimed to boost
domestic production within the US but inadvertently disrupted the
intricate balance of North American auto trade. The tariffs have made
American vehicles less competitive in Canada, prompting a reevaluation
of trade dynamics in the region.
In
response to Trump's tariffs, Ottawa implemented a reciprocal tariff on
US-made vehicles. However, the Canadian government introduced a
significant caveat: tax relief for manufacturers that continue to invest
in local production. This strategic move has softened the impact on
companies like Stellantis and General Motors, which have substantial
operations in Canada.
Data from Bloomberg
highlights the extent of this shift. In June alone, Canada imported
vehicles worth 1.080 billion Canadian dollars from Mexico, equivalent to
approximately 784 million US dollars. In contrast, imports from the US
amounted to 950 million Canadian dollars. This trend reflects a growing
preference for Mexican-assembled vehicles, driven by competitive pricing
and favorable trade terms.
Mexico
has capitalized on its role within the United States-Mexico-Canada
Agreement (USMCA), which partially mitigates the impact of tariffs. This
agreement has enhanced the competitiveness of vehicles assembled south
of the Rio Grande, offering an attractive alternative to Canadian
consumers and businesses.
The shift in trade
patterns poses challenges for Detroit's automotive giants. Ford, for
instance, traditionally supplies Canada with US-made vehicles. Although
its Oakville, Ontario plant is not yet producing high-volume models,
Ford has announced plans to begin manufacturing F-Series Super Duty
pickups there by 2026. This move reflects a strategic adaptation to the
evolving trade landscape.
Food represents a large and visible share of household spending, and
high grocery bills influence public perceptions of the economy and the
administration's performance.
A mid-2025 poll
from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research found
that a majority of Americans reported stress over grocery costs, and
retailers have reported shoppers shifting purchases toward cheaper
brands and smaller sizes. Roughly 53 percent of respondents said grocery
costs were a "major" stressor.
Trump campaigned on promises of lowering grocery costs, but federal
forecasts and private trackers showed only modest easing overall and
price gains in several food staples.
The USDA Economic Research
Service reported that the all-food Consumer Price Index (CPI) rose 0.3
percent from May to June and was 3 percent higher than June 2024.
It also projected overall food prices would rise 2.9 percent this year and 2.7 percent in 2026.
Zoom in: A
38.9% increase in prices for fresh and dry vegetables from June to July
was the major driver of a higher index for "final demand goods" (things
that are done and ready to be sold to a consumer, as opposed to things
that go into a later production process).
That was the biggest month-on-month increase for fresh vegetables since March 2022.
Stunning stat: Per Bureau of Labor Statistics data, it's also the largest monthly increase ever recorded in a summer month (June-August), in figures that go back to 1947.
Let's note this MSNBC video.
We
noted two snapshots ago. When we noted it, we noted that it had nearly
half a million streams. It's now at 1.1 million. Here's a report Ari
did yesterday.
And here's a discussion on the expected release (later today) of some Epstein files.
However,
the issue is not going away, regardless of efforts. Earlier this
summer, Republican speaker Mike Johnson literally sent home members of
Congress early to avoid a vote on the release of files containing
information about Epstein. Back in their constituencies, politicians
learned that getting to the bottom of the matter remains a pressing
issue for many of the people who voted for them.
When
they do return, they may be unable to escape a vote, or at least
addressing the issue. Before they left Washington DC, Democrat Ro Khanna
of California, and Republican Thomas Massie of Kentucky, filed a motion
that allows any member of the chamber to force a vote if a majority
signs on. This means many Republicans will be forced to do as their
constituents want and vote for the release of all files, or risk
angering Trump who wants nothing more than this issue to go away for
ever. Democratic Senator Ruben Gallego told reporters: “We’re going to
keep the pressure up – 100 per cent.” He added: “As often as we can,
until we know exactly what happened, why it happened.”
U.S.
Representative Robert Garcia (D-CA), who is a member of the House
Oversight Committee, said this week on MSNBC: “These Epstein files are
only coming to the Oversight Committee because Democrats forced a vote
to subpoena them. If Republicans refuse to subpoena Alex Acosta, the
person who put together Epstein’s sweetheart deal, we will force another
vote to bring him in.”
Prior
to becoming President Trump’s Secretary of Labor during his first term
in the White House, Acosta was the U.S. Attorney for the Southern
District of Florida who approved a plea deal that allowed Epstein to
plead guilty to one state charge of solicitation, in exchange for a
federal non-prosecution agreement in 2008. After Epstein’s arrest in
2019 on sex trafficking charges, Acosta resigned from his cabinet
position.
In March, Acosta joined the board of directors of Newsmax.
Donald
Chump can't shake the Epstein scandal. For years, he was friends with
Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell -- convicted pedophiles and sex
traffickers. Epstein died in prison under Chump's watch. Maxwell got
moved to a cushy Club "Fed." By Chump. That move did not happen
without his okay. That was needed. I know that for a fact. I worked
forever on getting someone out of federal prison under an earlier
president. I know exactly what it takes and the Justice Dept by itself
cannot move Maxwell to a facility that does not accept prisoners
convicted of sex offenses. That requires the president of the United
States' approval. The story is not going away. Chris Hatler (ESQUIRE) notes:
“You
have to be on another planet if you don’t know anything about Epstein,”
Julie K. Brown tells me over the phone. Maybe I shouldn’t have played
dumb. The award-winning investigative reporter exposed Jeffrey Esptein’s
sex-trafficking activities for the Miami Herald, after all. But with
the Epstein files littering news feeds, including a House Oversight
Committee plan to release documents this Friday, I thought we needed a
primer for our conversation.
“There
were probably hundreds of underage girls and young women who were
sexually abused by this very powerful man over three decades. Then, he
essentially walked away with little or no punishment for the crimes,
even though the case was in the hands of the Justice Department,” Brown
says.
Epstein was arrested and jailed in 2019.
That August, he died by suicide in his cell. Since then, there have been
calls from across the political spectrum to release the Epstein files, a
collection of documents and investigative materials gathered by law
enforcement about Epstein and his victims and associates. He had friends
in high places, some of whom likely don’t want any additional
information uncovered.
“Even if you weren’t
involved in any of his crimes, just being linked to him now is a bad
thing,” Brown says. “Just being friends with him, you could get
blackballed.”
Brown
wrote an entire book on what she learned from her reporting, Perversion
of Justice, which was published in 2020. But even someone as informed
as she is wonders who knew Epstein and whether or not he died by his own
hand. Here are five questions to which she wants answers—whether or not
documents drop Friday.
Did Attorney General Pam Bondi know Epstein?
During
our conversation, Brown seems particularly curious about who knew
Epstein and the nature of their relationship. One name comes up before
the others: Pam Bondi.
Bondi was elected
attorney general of Florida—where Epstein owned a home and committed
crimes—in 2010 and assumed the position in 2011. She wasn’t in office
during Epstein’s first prosecution, which began in 2007, after which he
received a lenient sentence. Until he was arrested in 2019, Epstein
continued to traffic young women and girls, which occurred during
Bondi’s tenure. Brown wants those dots to connect.
“Did
anyone ask Bondi if she knew Epstein? She was involved in Florida.
Epstein was in Florida. Epstein was adept at getting dirt on people.
That’s what he liked to do. So do we know whether Bondi ever had any
kind of contact with Epstein or his lawyers?”
Let's wind down with this from Senator Sheldon Whitehouse's office:
Nonpartisan CBO releases new letter at request of
Whitehouse, Wyden, Merkley, Boyle showing GOP megabill triggers
mandatory $45 billion cut to Medicare and $120 billion cut to
non-Medicare programs in 2026
Big, Beautiful-for-Billionaires Law explodes deficit to fund tax cuts for the ultrawealthy and giant corporations
Washington, D.C. – The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office released a letter yesterday
at the request of Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), Ranking Member of
the Senate Finance Committee Ron Wyden (D-OR), Ranking Member of the
Senate Budget Committee Jeff Merkley (D-OR), and Ranking Member of the
House Budget Committee Brendan F. Boyle (D-PA) confirming that by
exploding the deficit, President Trump’s Big, Beautiful-for-Billionaires
Law will automatically trigger the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act, which
will impose a $45 billion cut to Medicare in 2026, and $536 billion in
automatic cuts to Medicare over nine years.
“We all know that Trump’s Big, Beautiful-for-Billionaires Law
explodes the deficit with tax breaks for the ultra-rich and giant
corporations, while slashing Medicaid and eliminating programs to feed
hungry families. But Republicans are playing a shell game by hiding the
sneak attack on Medicare that they tucked into their law,” said Whitehouse.
“CBO has now confirmed it: Trump’s Big, Beautiful-for-Billionaires Law
triggers sequestration next year, resulting in massive, mandatory cuts
to Medicare and other treasured programs. No Republican who voted for
this bill can credibly say that they want to protect Medicare.”
“If Republicans were serious about protecting Medicare from cuts,
they wouldn’t have passed a bill that triggers half a trillion dollars
in cuts to Medicare,” Wyden said. “The reality is,
Trump said he wouldn’t cut Medicaid, and then he turned around and
passed the biggest Medicaid cut in history. He said he wouldn’t hurt
Social Security, and then he gutted its staff and set DOGE loose on the
program like a pack of wild dogs. Trump and Republicans cannot be
trusted with Medicare, and whatever promises they make about protecting
the program are worthless.”
“Congressional Republicans’ dangerous Big, Betrayal Law not only
guts
programs like Medicaid, the Affordable Care Act, and food assistance,
but today we’re reminded that it also forces cuts to Medicare and many
other critical programs. Because Republicans were so hell bent on
passing a law that gives tax cuts to billionaires – that adds trillions
to the national debt – their reckless actions have now triggered
automatic spending cuts – meaning that without future Congressional
action, seniors and people with disabilities will pay the price and have
less access to care,” said Senate Budget Committee Ranking Member Jeff
Merkley. “This is just more of the Republicans’ families lose,
billionaires win agenda and the American people won’t stand for it.”
“For months now, I have been sounding the alarm on the devastating
Medicare cuts caused by Trump’s Big Ugly Law,” said House Budget
Committee Ranking Member Brendan F. Boyle.
“Republicans knew their tax breaks for billionaires would force over
half a trillion dollars in Medicare cuts — and they did it anyway.
American families simply cannot afford Donald Trump’s attacks on
Medicare, Medicaid, and Obamacare.”
In early July, President Trump and Congressional Republicans jammed
through their Big, Beautiful-for-Billionaires Bill, which cuts almost a
trillion dollars from Medicaid and raises health insurance costs, all to
bankroll tax breaks for billionaires and big corporations.
The CBO letter explains that the Republicans’ Big,
Beautiful-for-Billionaires Law will increase deficits relative to the
January 2025 baseline by $2.1 trillion through 2029 and by $3.4 trillion
through 2034. The law’s addition to the deficit triggers the
sequestration process under the Statutory Pay‑As‑You‑Go (PAYGO) Act of
2010. CBO estimates that the White House Office of Management and
Budget will be required to issue a sequestration order to reduce
spending by $415 billion in fiscal year 2026. Republicans could pass
legislation waiving the PAYGO requirements, but did not include such a
provision in the Big, Beautiful-for-Billionaires Law.
CBO estimates that OMB would be required to issue a 4% sequestration
cut to Medicare, which is expected to cut $45 billion in 2026 and total
$536 billion over nine years. Sequestration cuts to other non-Medicare
programs are expected to total $120 billion in 2026.
You might think that serving as president of the United
States was a time consuming job but you would apparently be wrong. The
Convicted Felon made time for a late night rant last night. Ewan Palmer (DAILY BEAST) notes that Mr. Chump was attacking MSNBC at length last night:
Trump,
no stranger to attacking media outlets he doesn’t like, went after
MSNBC when one of its star anchors, Lawrence O’Donnell, mocked him for
shielding his swollen ankles, a symptom of the medical condition chronic
venous insufficiency.
During a monologue on
The Last Word, O’Donnell noted that Trump took the almost unheard-of
step of sitting behind the Resolute Desk during a meeting with European
leaders in the Oval Office on Monday, rather than the usual spot in
front of the fireplace.
O’Donnell said Trump made
the move to ensure that “no one was going to compare his ankles to a
French president’s ankles or a German chancellor’s or a British prime
minister’s.”
Trump wasn’t so lucky when he met Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday, with the two seated in chairs out in the open.
O’Donnell
quipped that the Russian president’s “72-year-old ankles showed none of
the mileage” of Trump’s, whose swollen cankles were on full display.
The
White House also appears to be working to hide Trump’s bloating issues,
going so far as to release an official photo of his meeting with
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in which a model of Air Force One
is conveniently positioned to block the Republican’s ankles.
The Convicted Felon has too much free time. Here is the video of Lawrence O'Donnell's commentary that upset Mr. Chump so much.
President
Donald Trump reportedly inquired of the Nobel Peace Prize during a
conversation with Norway’s finance minister. The call, which also
includes discussions on trade tariffs, has since drawn international
attention. Pakistan and Cambodia have expressed support for Trump's
Nobel Peace Prize nomination, citing his diplomatic efforts. Republican
lawmakers and several global leaders have also backed his nomination.
The
White House stated, "As president, he has brokered peace between
Azerbaijan and Armenia, Cambodia and Thailand, Israel and Iran, Rwanda
and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, India and Pakistan, Egypt and
Ethiopia, Serbia and Kosovo, and with the Abraham Accords."
Newspaper
Dagens Naeringsliv reported, "Out of the blue, while Stoltenberg was
walking down the street in Oslo, Donald Trump called." The paper added,
“He wanted the Nobel Prize – and to discuss tariffs.”
There
has never, in all of history, been a U.S. president less deserving of a
Nobel Peace Prize than Mr. Chump. His vanity knows no bounds. And
instead of working to improve the lives of the American people, the
dying man is off trying to buy awards. Thom Hartmann explains Mr. Chump's war on mail-in voting:
This
is not just a partisan maneuver. It’s an open assault on the
Constitution, a grotesque power grab, and a direct threat to the
foundation of democracy itself. And it’s happening in real time, in
broad daylight, with a criminally compliant Republican Party cheering
him on.
Republicans hate mail-in voting for multiple reasons.
First,
for people who’re paid by the hour, mail-in voting increases
participation because they can fill out their ballots at the kitchen
table after work. Republicans don’t want people to vote, and have
introduced more than 400 pieces of legislation in the past three years
nationwide to make voting more difficult.
Second,
mail-in voting makes voters better informed and less vulnerable to
sound-byte TV ads because, while perusing that ballot at the kitchen
table, they can look up candidates on their laptops and get more detail
and information. Republicans hate informed voters and rely heavily on
often-dishonest advertisements to swing voters.
Third,
mail-in ballots — because they arrive in the mail weeks before the
election — give voters an early chance to discover if they’ve been the
victim of Republican voter-roll purges, one of their favorite tactics to
pre-rig elections.
Fourth,
mail-in ballots end the GOP trick of understaffing and under-resourcing
polling places in minority neighborhoods, leading to hours-long lines.
Hispanic voters generally wait 150 percent longer than white voters, and
Black voters must endure a 200 percent longer wait; mail-in ballots put
an end to this favorite of the GOP’s voter suppression efforts.
Trump,
knowing all this, couldn’t help himself yesterday, finally blurting out
his real reason for wanting to end mail-in voting in America:
“We
got to stop mail-in voting, and the Republicans have to lead the
charge. The Democrats want it because they have horrible policy. If you
[don’t] have mail-in voting, you’re not gonna have many Democrats get
elected. That’s bigger than anything having to do with redistricting,
believe me.”
U.S.
District Judge Stephanie Gallagher has blocked Trump administration
directives regarding diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs in
education. Opponents argued the measures have unlawfully chilled lawful
practices, while Trump officials maintained that they are enforcing
anti-discrimination law. Gallagher directly struck down the Education
Department’s memos and a “Dear Colleague” letter, marking a significant
ruling against federal overreach in schools.
Gallagher
found the directives violated the Administrative Procedure Act and
raised constitutional concerns. She stated, “It initiated a sea change
in how the Department of Education (ED) regulates educational practices
and classroom conduct, causing millions of educators to reasonably fear
that their lawful, and even beneficial, speech might cause them or their
schools to be punished.”
Gallagher wrote,
“Plaintiffs have shown that neither challenged agency action was
promulgated in accordance with the procedural requirements of the APA,
and that both actions run afoul of important constitutional rights.”
The
ED was ordered to rescind guidance that threatened funding over alleged
DEI policy violations. The directives told K-12 districts to certify no
DEI practices and warned universities to end “illegal” DEI efforts or
risk losing federal funds.
Good.
I remember when the best thing about America was its willing to look at
its past, admit mistakes, and grow. Now we're (mis)led by a man who
cannot admit to ever making a mistake even once in his life.
Thursday, August 21, 2025. Chump and his national security stooges
are giving us new grounds for impeachment, Chump's fading in the polls, a
judge rebukes Chump for his efforts to distract from his failure to
release the Epstein files, Chump continues his war on immigrants, and
much more.
We have a lot to cover regarding Chump's war on immigrants but let's start with polling. Alex Henderson reports:
Trump,
according to the Miami Herald, won 32 percent of Hispanic voters in
2020; in 2024, that number increased to 46 percent — much to the
frustration of Democratic strategists.
But according to the Herald's Brendan Rascius, polls are showing his approval among Latinos falling.
In an article published on August 19, Rascius cites polling data from Reuters/Ipsos poll,
The Hill and Gallup and explains, "Conducted over six days in August,
the (Reuters/Ipsos) poll found 40 percent of respondents approve of
Trump's job performance so far. This figure, while the lowest recorded
since Trump's inauguration, is unchanged from July. But it is down 7
points from January, when a record-high 47 percent of Americans approved
of Trump."
Trump's inroads among Latinos, Rascius
notes, helped him win the 2024 election. But now, according to Rascius,
"About one-third of Hispanic respondents, 32 percent, said they approved
of Trump's job performance, on par with a previous low recorded this
year. By comparison, the president's approval rating among Hispanic
adults stood at 34 percent in April and 37 percent in January, marking a
5-point decline, according to The Hill."
On the same day a new poll by The Economist/YouGov showed Donald Trump’s disapproval rating hitting a new high,
the president took time to post this on social media: “The Smithsonian
is OUT OF CONTROL, where everything discussed is how horrible our
Country is, how bad Slavery was, and how unaccomplished the downtrodden
have been.”
How bad slavery
was? I’m not quite sure what that implies, but suffice it to say the new
poll didn’t find “See less about how slavery was bad” to be a priority
for American voters watching the costs of beef and vegetables skyrocket.
And a Pew Research Center survey released Aug. 14
showed that just 38% of Americans approve of Trump's performance as
president, with significant majorities disapproving of his signature
"One Big Beautiful Bill," his approach to tariffs and changes he has
made to the federal government.
Americans
dislike just about everything Trump brags about. And the more he touts
what he sees as major accomplishments, the less America likes them – and
him.
Journalist
Tara Pameri said Tuesday President Donald Trump and his administration
are "pushing deadlines back" when it comes to the documents related to
convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, only giving out "small pieces to
appease their base."
During an appearance on
CNN Tuesday, Palmeri, who has been reporting on the Epstein controversy,
said, "I would think that these documents are going to be very limited.
I obviously would love to see all of the gigabytes that they’re holding
on to: The evidence, the surveillance, the photos that I’ve been told
of from senior law enforcement sources that they are holding on to."
She
continued: "But, as you have heard and see from your own reporters and
reporting, they are kicking this down — they’re kicking the can down the
road. They’re pushing deadlines back. They’re releasing limited amounts
of files, and we just know that this is —this is happening in private."
She
added that these should be public hearings where everyone is called on
to speak, including FBI director Kash Patel, Attorney General Pam Bondi,
and even Trump.
"If they’re calling the former
president, Bill Clinton — they should be calling him [Trump] as well,
since he’s also in the files. So I just think, this just seems like
they’re giving out small pieces to appease their base, but really, they
need to come clean right now," Palmeri said.
She added that former labor secretary Alex Acosta’s deputy, Marie Villafana, would be "an excellent person to call."
They
should call Villafana but, please note, they won't even Alex Acosta and
he's the one who gave Epstein the sweetheart deal -- the one that
Ghislaine Maxwell's new deal is starting to look a lot like -- and Chump
gave Maxwell her sweetheart deal. Matthew Chapman notes:
House
Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-KY) has moved forward with a
plan to partially release information from the Jeffrey Epstein sex
trafficking case — but House Democrats, including ranking member Robert
Garcia (D-CA), are not satisfied with this limited production.
And
furthermore, Garcia told MSNBC's "The Weeknight" panel on Tuesday,
they've left out a massively important witness from all this: President
Donald Trump's former Secretary of Labor Alex Acosta, who as a former
federal prosecutor, helped Epstein escape justice in the first place.
"James
Comer's spokesperson, responded today to you," said anchor Eugene
Daniels. "They said, you're trying to invent a crisis where none exists.
And at the end, they said former Attorney General Bill Barr testified
that he never saw any evidence suggesting President Trump committed a
crime. Now, they have been very specific about committing a crime, but
are they lying in that statement based on what you heard?"
"Without
actually commenting on exactly that statement, I will say that's a very
— that's a very creative crafting of a statement," said Garcia. "And I
think that if they have nothing to hide, they should release the
complete transcript or video of the Bill Barr deposition. So let's do
that and let's let the American public make their own judgments."
Letting
the American people make their own judgment? Donald Chump would rather
do some actual work than let that happen. And, as Lawrence O'Donnell
noted last night, Chump does not like to work.
Especially not on a day when a court exposes him as a liar.
As
Lawrence noted, the moment Chump was in hot water over not releasing
the Epstein files as he'd promised to do, suddenly Chump tried to
distract by calling for the Grand Jury transcripts to be released.
Lawrence called that out immediately noting that it was a kick-the-can
tactic because Grand Jury testimony does not get released. Chump was
hoping his announcement would make the Epstein story go away and that
when verdicts emerged on releasing the testimony, everyone would be
focused on something else. Chump did manage to delay but public
attention has not waned. Yesterday the third verdict on this from a
judge came out.
Each judge cited longstanding grand jury secrecy rules and concluded
that the government did not meet any of the extraordinary exceptions
under federal law that could justify making them public.
They also
noted that the Justice Department has voluminous records related to
Epstein that aren't covered by grand jury secrecy rules. Berman wrote
that the scant information contained in around 70 pages of Epstein grand
jury transcripts "pales in comparison to the Epstein investigative
information and materials in the hands of the Department of Justice,"
which he said totals around 100,000 pages.
"The Government is the
logical party to make comprehensive disclosure to the public of the
Epstein Files," Berman wrote in an apparent reference to the Justice
Department's refusal to release additional records. He said the request
to release grand jury records "appears to be a 'diversion' from the
breadth and scope of the Epstein files in the Government's possession."
The Justice Department had informed Berman that the only witness to
testify before the Epstein grand jury was an FBI agent who, the judge
noted, "had no direct knowledge of the facts of the case and whose
testimony was mostly hearsay." The rest of the grand jury presentation
consisted of a PowerPoint slideshow and a call log.
Berman noted that
the Justice Department's files on Epstein dwarf those stemming from the
grand jury. Proceedings before grand juries are typically kept secret.
"A
significant and compelling reason to reject the Government's position
in this litigation is that the Government has already undertaken a
comprehensive investigation into the Epstein case and, not surprisingly,
has assembled a 'trove' of Epstein documents, interviews, and exhibits.
And, the Government committed that it would share its Epstein
investigation materials with the public," Berman wrote.
"The Government is the logical party to make comprehensive disclosure
to the public of the Epstein Files. By comparison, the instant grand
jury motion appears to be a 'diversion' from the breadth and scope of
the Epstein files in the Government's possession," Berman wrote, quoting
a decision by another judge in New York who denied the government's move
to unseal material in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's
co-conspirator who is serving a 20-year sentence on sex-trafficking
charges.
"The information contained in the Epstein grand jury
transcripts pales in comparison to the Epstein investigation information
and materials in the hands of the Department of Justice," he concluded.
For more on this, you can stream Nicole Wallace's report . . .
. . . and Ari Mebler's report.
As
the judge noted, this was a distraction. And Chump's efforts to change
the topic have not gone unnoticed by the people nor is this story going
away.
Shame on Gov. Mike DeWine for sending
our Ohio National Guard to Washington, D.C. at the whim of our
president, who has conjured up another "emergency" in our country.
President Donald Trump has accomplished one thing by doing this. No one is mentioning the Epstein files.
Gov. DeWine, don't be complicit. Bring the Guard home.
Prosecutors
[led by then-U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta and then-Palm Beach County State
Attorney Barry Krischer] intentionally kept the victims and their
lawyers in the dark because they knew these young women would never
allow such a sweetheart deal to stand.
Let’s
be clear — this was not just negligence. It was a betrayal. By cutting
this backroom deal in secrecy, the government told these girls their
pain didn’t matter, their voices didn’t matter, and their futures didn’t
matter.
They were victimized once by Epstein and Maxwell, and then victimized again by their own government. Enough with the excuses.
The
victims deserve better, and the public deserves the truth. Release the
files, expose the liars, and the truth for the world to see what
actually happened.
A
six-year-old girl and her mother, who were seeking asylum in the United
States, have been deported to Ecuador after being arrested in New York
City and held in immigration detention for a week.
The
second-grade student went to an Immigration and Customs Enforcement
check-in appointment with her mother and older brother in lower
Manhattan on August 12 when they were detained by federal agents.
New
York officials confirmed that the young girl and her mother, who had
been living in Queens, were deported on Tuesday morning. The girl’s
19-year-old brother is still locked up in an immigration detention
center in New Jersey.
The case of another New
York City public school student being targeted has drawn renewed
scrutiny and outrage over the practice of arresting immigrants at
routine check-in appointments and court hearings.
The
child’s arrest appears to be the first known ICE arrest of a New Yorker
under the age of 18 during Donald Trump’s administration.
New
York City schools saw increased enrollment driven, in part, by families
who had sought asylum during the Biden administration. New York Gov.
Kathy Hochul weighed in on the family’s behalf, and school officials are
working to assure students that schools will remain a welcoming place.
“She
had no power to decide which country she would be living,” said Astrid
Avedissian, a lawyer for one of the student's siblings, who is 16. "She
had no power to decide which border she would be crossing."
[. . .]
On
Aug. 19, New York City Councilmember Shekar Krishnan and state
Assemblymember Catalina Cruz, both representatives in Queens, confirmed
the student and her mother were deported. ICE records show her brother,
Manuel, 19, is still in custody.
"Deporting a
6-year-old child two weeks before she is supposed to start school,
separating her and her mother from their family, is cruel," Krishnan and
Cruz said in a joint statement. "It is a shameful stain on our
country's history and conscience."
A
Colombian man seeking asylum was arrested by federal agents while
attending a routine immigration appointment in Tennessee, his girlfriend
told Newsweek.
Morgan Bowser, 28, said
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents detained her partner,
John Ever Pineda Calderón, 35, a hotel renovation worker seeking asylum,
inside the Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP) Office in
Memphis.
Bowser said she was waiting in the parking lot as the arrest unfolded on August 7 around 10 a.m.
An
ISAP appointment is a scheduled check-in that immigrants are required
to attend while their immigration cases are being processed.
Bowser,
who described waiting for hours without knowing what had happened to
Calderón, said she was left heartbroken after receiving a call from him
confirming he had been detained and transferred.
These are horrible stories. They go against democracy, they go against what we're supposed to value in the United States. David Kurtz (TPM) notes:
I
usually cast President Trump’s anti-immigrant mass deportation agenda
as a rule of law story. But it is of course so much more than that. It
is fundamentally a story about racism, xenophobia, and othering. It’s
about preying on our fears, differences, and prejudices to create a
villainous foe whom he can easily vanquish in repeated set-pieces. It’s
about letting loose the worst of our impulses to heighten and sustain
divisions among us.
The mass
deportation agenda is just one part of a larger agenda in which white
Americans are fronted as the real America and everyone else is
second-class, unless they individually demonstrate in lavish ways a high
enough degree of fealty to Donald Trump.
It’s
against this backdrop that much of this week’s news is taking place:
Trump’s minimizing of chattel slavery; the federalization of D.C. police
and the deployment of red state national guards to a plurality Black
city; the phasing out of support for non-native English speakers in
school; new hoops for legal immigrants to jump through; and a gauntlet
of other indignities and slights that preference white citizens.
[. . .]
The
mass deportation agenda is just one part of a larger agenda in which
white Americans are fronted as the real America and everyone else is
second-class, unless they individually demonstrate in lavish ways a high
enough degree of fealty to Donald Trump.
It’s
against this backdrop that much of this week’s news is taking place:
Trump’s minimizing of chattel slavery; the federalization of D.C. police
and the deployment of red state national guards to a plurality Black
city; the phasing out of support for non-native English speakers in
school; new hoops for legal immigrants to jump through; and a gauntlet
of other indignities and slights that preference white citizens.
Students
are attacked -- college students and children -- and mothers are
attacked -- even nursing mothers have been separated from their
children, the elderly are attacked, an immigrant who was a police
officer gets attacked, the list is endless. It's not about
immigration. Dan Gooding (NEWSWEEK) reports:
A
Los Angeles teacher whose student was detained by federal agents while
he walked his dog has told Newsweek that she believes mistaken bounty
hunters plucked him off the street.
Lizette
Becerra, who works within the Los Angeles Unified School District
(LAUSD), visited Benjamin Marcelo Guerrero-Cruz, 18, in Immigration and
Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention on Sunday.
"For
about seven days, he could not change, he was in his pajama shorts and
slippers. He couldn't bathe. He couldn't brush his teeth. He was
sleeping next to a toilet where he had to wake up every time someone
went so that he wouldn't get urinated on," Becerra said.
"It
wasn't until Saturday morning that he was finally able to shower and
was issued clothes," she said, adding that he told her he lost weight,
as well.
[. . .]
Guerrero-Cruz
is currently being held in the Adelanto Detention Facility, on the edge
of Victorville outside of L.A. Before that, Becerra said, he had been
moved between two other facilities in the city itself since his arrest
around two weeks ago.
"He says about 15 men,
plain clothes with vests that said: 'Immigration Police' on them, in
three SUVs, came up to him and just grabbed him and started calling him
by another name," Becerra said, adding that the teen tried to tell the
men he was not the person they were looking for.
ICE
has carried out their thug tactics with no real oversight. Chump has
given them powers they've never had before and these are thugs. They're
the worst of the worst. Most probably couldn't get into the military
(or, in some cases, back into the military) without a conduct waiver. Melissa Gira Grant (THE NEW REPUBLIC) notes:
The beatdown in broad daylight in Washington, D.C., on Saturday was caught on video.
Two masked men in tactical vests grappled with a delivery worker. One
tased him, and he fell to the ground. A third man piled on, and then a
fourth, a fifth, and a sixth, all in similar vests with faces covered.
Pinning the worker face down on the pavement, agents tased him again and
punched him repeatedly in the head. “Get the f**k out of this city!” a
bystander’s voice yelled out at the masked men. “Why are you guys here?”
The masked men’s vests only identified them as “police,” as is often the
case with Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, and later, their
arrest—in the upscale Logan Circle neighborhood—was confirmed by the Department of Homeland Security. It was part of the escalation in the federal law enforcement occupation ordered
by Trump, with multiple agencies patrolling neighborhoods, stopping
residents at checkpoints, and making arrests. Throughout, these federal
agents have met opposition from countless bystanders and witnesses, who record them, jeer at them, and demand they leave their city.
In that sense, nothing about the assault on Saturday stood out so
much as it captured all these dynamics in the span of three minutes. It
laid bare too how this takeover of an American city—the nation’s
capital, no less—has been brewing in the far-right imagination for a
long time. “You guys are ruining the country,” said
one of the bystanders to the masked agents, and one of them responded,
“Liberals already ruined it.” Once, it was far-right groups who flooded
cities in the summertime, in masks and tactical vests, looking for a
fight; now, those groups have no need to be in the streets, with ICE and
other federal agents carrying out their mission for them. As one Proud
Boy organizer said
at a Portland, Oregon, rally in 2018, “For all the illegals trying to
jump over our border, we should be smashing their heads into the
concrete.”
What we are seeing now flows from those dramatic street
confrontations, brought on by groups such as Patriot Prayer and the
Proud Boys nearly a decade ago, when they made Portland their target and
Patriot Prayer leader Joey Gibson pledged,
“The stench-covered and liberal-occupied streets of Portland will be
CLEANSED.” Gibson was running as a Republican for the Washington state
Senate at the time, and the Portland Police Bureau was in close contact
with Patriot Prayer organizers, as reporting by Willamette Weekexposed. The police regarded them as “much more mainstream” than leftist counterprotesters, arresting more of the latter than Proud Boys or Patriot Prayer members—even as the far-right groups were advocating the murder of immigrants and leftists.
[. . .]
Seeing how ICE in particular have conducted themselves over the last few
months, some people have feared that the masked agents Trump has
unleashed might be the same people he pardoned for their involvement in
the January 6 insurrection. Had they now infiltrated or been secretly hired into ICE and other agencies? A former assistant ICE director told
Slate in July that he was “very worried” that “Proud Boys and other
insurrectionists and hoodlums” would be hired at ICE, because, “What
self-respecting person who wants a meaningful career in law enforcement
would go to work [for Enforcement and Removal Operations] right now?
Union
del Barrio, a migrant advocacy organization with offices throughout
Southern California and New York City, says it has trained hundreds of
teachers on how to intervene and interact with federal immigration
agents who might be trying to detain a student or parent near a school.
On
Tuesday morning, some members of Union del Barrio, some of whom are
also teachers from across San Diego County, staged an educational
campaign outside Lincoln High School, handing out flyers to parents as
they dropped off their children.
“What this is
really about is showing solidarity to the familias, to the students, to
ensure they feel there’s a community behind them, that they are welcomed
here and they should be coming to school in spite of with this threat
of ICE coming to schools and drop-offs,” said Erendira Ramirez, educator
and member of Union del Barrio.
A
Sheraton hotel in Louisiana has been used by immigration officials to
hold people who are being deported, in what appears to be a
contradiction of a position Sheraton’s parent company, Marriott, took in
2019 when it said its properties would not be used in cooperation with
Ice.
The Intercept first reported
that the hotel, located on MacArthur Drive in Alexandria, Louisiana,
near a major deportation hub and airport used by Ice, had been used by
immigration officials earlier this month to hold a father and his
teenage son for four days after their arrest in New York. They were then
deported to Ecuador. The Intercept cited phone-tracking evidence that
had been shared with the publication and was later seen by the Guardian.
The
evidence corroborates the account of a source with knowledge of hotel
operations in Alexandria, who told the Guardian that they believed the
venue had been used to detain immigrant families and unaccompanied
children since it was renovated in late 2023. The source observed Ice
contractors known to assist in the transfer of unaccompanied minors
operating at the Sheraton as recently as June of this year.
The source added that other hotels in the area have also been used to hold immigrant families.
It
is not clear whether Marriott has a formal contract with Ice or what
the company knows about Ice’s use of the Sheraton in Alexandria. In one case that emerged last year,
Marriott sued a New York-based franchise after the hotel entered a
partnership with the city for it to be used as an immigrant shelter,
saying it had done so without Marriott’s consent.
Marriott needs to immediately clarify what took place. And we need to support those who refuse to let ICE rip them off. Jacob Gardenswartz (SCRIPP NEWS) informs:
A
growing number of U.S. corporations and pop culture artists are
publicly distancing themselves from the Department of Homeland Security
and criticizing the agency for utilizing their content in posts and
branding aimed at immigration enforcement activities and new officer
recruitment.
In
recent weeks, companies including INDYCAR, Penske Truck Rental and Ford
Motor Company have all said that their content was used by DHS without
permission or in violation of company policies. Popular bands and
artists including Semisonic, Black Rebel Motorcycle Club (BRMC), Jess
Glynne, Thomas Kinkade and Morgan Weistling have similarly asked DHS to
stop using their work or take down posts.
Reached
by Scripps News, a DHS spokesperson declined to answer questions about
the process by which DHS identifies and clears intellectual property,
nor would the official state how the agency is responding to the
companies’ criticisms. The agency said in a statement only that, “DHS
will continue using every tool at its disposal to keep the American
people informed as our agents work to Make America Safe Again.”
There are thousands of horror stories about ICE attacking people. But? Some horror stories prompt no tears from many of us. Billal Rahman (NEWSWEEK) reports on someone whining when they got what they deserved:
A
United States combat veteran and Trump voter has told Newsweek his wife
was detained by federal immigration agents at the Nogales port of entry
while attempting to renew her in-country travel permit.
Eddie
J. Rosa, 43, a USPS electronics technician and veteran of the U.S.
Marine Corps, U.S. Army Reserves, and the Ohio National Guard, said his
wife, Mireya Alexandra Blancarte Marquez, was arrested on August 11.
Rosa goes on to whine:
Rosa,
who served in Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom,
described his wife being handcuffed, perp-walked, and paraded in front
of the public "like a common criminal."
"My
wife has absolutely no criminal record of any kind in this country or
Mexico. As a fervent believer in our constitutional republic, I felt
violated and disrespected," Rosa told Newsweek in a statement.
You got what you deserved, stop whining you little cry baby.
Please
note, if he was decrying his vote now and calling Chump out? Okay, he
made a mistake in voting for Chump and realizes that. Live and learn,
let's work together. But that's not the case. He says he doesn't
regret his vote for Chump. So he'd vote for him again. This is the
signature policy Chump's second administration will be remembered for.
If you support Chump now -- even though your wife's been taken into
custody and you've been humiliated -- you got what you deserve. If FAFO
doesn't bring you to your senses, do the country a favor and STFU
because you're too stupid for a conversation in the public square.
We were talking about conduct
waivers earlier and that makes me wonder if Loose Lips Hegseth is still
using weight wavers? People who are not physically fit getting into the
US military on a waiver for their weight. (They're called medical
waivers, but I'm referring to the ones granted specifically to
candidates who should not qualify due to their weight.) Hegseth's in the
news. He and all the security post holders should be in the news.
Trashy Garbage (Trina's name for Tulsi Gabbard) is not qualified for her
post as the head of DNI. That post was created post-9/11 to protect
Americans. It's a highly important job and she's not qualified. We've
noted from the day after Hegseth was nominated to be Secretary of
Defense that he wasn't qualified. No one holding a post that's supposed
to protect Americans is qualified. And that's a serious issue.
Let's do Tulsi and we'll then go onto Pete. Callum Sutherland (TIME) reports, "The
Trump Administration has revoked the security clearances of 37 current
and former U.S. government officials. Director of National Intelligence
Tulsi Gabbard publicly shared a memo confirming the revocation and the
reasoning behind it, stating that it was carried out under the direction
of President Donald Trump." This being the unqualified Tulsi, things
were, of course, a bit more complicated. Ewan Palmer (DAILY BEAST) explains:
Tulsi
Gabbard may have broken the law by publicly identifying dozens of
current and former officials while revoking their security clearances,
according to a national security lawyer.
Gabbard
revealed that 37 people have been targeted in the clearance purge
ordered by President Trump, accusing them without evidence of
“politicizing and manipulating intelligence, leaking classified
intelligence without authorization, and/or committing intentional
egregious violations of tradecraft standards.”
Gabbard
made the announcement—which comes after Trump stripped the security
clearance of his political opponents—by posting a memo from her office
on X. The list of 37 individuals targeted includes intelligence
officials who concluded that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential
election, as well as those accused by far-right activist Laura Loomer of
lacking loyalty to Trump, according to Axios.
Mark
Zaid, an attorney who represents intelligence officers and who is suing
the Trump administration to have his own stripped security clearance
restored, suggested Gabbard may have landed herself in legal trouble by
making the memo public.
Oh,
Trashy Garbage, couldn't you even get that right? Seriously. And is
this really the time -- when Chump has staffed his administration with
so many inept people in security positions -- for them to be purging
experienced officials? Doesn't that put us even more at risk? Another
9/11 could happen. If happens under Chump's watch, we'll all have to
face the reality of just how unqualified he and his appointees were.
Defense
Secretary Pete Hegseth’s security requirements are so extensive that it
is placing a strain on the U.S. Army’s Criminal Investigation Division,
according to a report.
The Washington Post
reports that the CID, which is responsible for protecting top Pentagon
officials as well as serving as the Army’s law enforcment arm, has been
forced to draft agents who would otherwise be investigating criminal
offenses concerning members of the Armed Forces to help watch over
Hegseth’s family and their properties in D.C., Minnesota and Tennessee.
“I’ve never seen this many security teams for one guy,” one official told the newspaper. “Nobody has.”
The CID reportedly maintains around 1,500 agents in total, around 150 of whom are typically assigned to VIP security details.
But
since Hegseth took office in January, the number shifted over into
personal protection roles has risen to between 400 and 500, according to
two differing estimates the paper received.
One
CID official quoted by the Post expressed their frustration with the
situation by saying agents were being prevented from “doing what we are
supposed to be doing” in order to “sit on luggage” or “sit in the cars
on the driveway.”
Others complained of having to shepherd the secretary’s children to school or patrol the perimeter of his properties.
“It
is literally taking away from [CID’s] law enforcement mission,” they
said. “You are taking hundreds of people out of the field to provide
this level of protection.”
Are
we surprised that the little coward who hid behind his Mommy during his
confirmation process would turn out to be the biggest coward in the
administration and demand multiple guards to protect him? The
candy asses of the administration need extra protection. And planes!
Don't forget they all seem to need their own personal plane. Yeah, we're talking Kristi Noem. In addition, Kelly Rissman (INDEPENDENT) reports:
Homeland
Security Secretary Kristi Noem blamed the media for her decision to
move to a rent-free military home, a space usually reserved for the top
Coast Guard official.
Speaking on Fox News’
Hannity on Monday evening, Noem argued that she had to leave her
apartment in the Navy Yard neighborhood of Washington, D.C. because of
the threats she’d received after news organizations published details
about her two-bedroom condo.
The Daily
Mail first reported she was living at a Navy Yard condo in April and
published photos outside the building. Last week, the Washington Post
revealed that the Homeland Security secretary pays no rent at her new
living arrangement: Quarters 1 at the Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling in
D.C., used to house the Coast Guard Commandant.
What
a bunch of wasteful, corrupt, idiotic so-called public servants. If a
terrorist attack takes place on US soil, we should all remember how
security officals were doing everything but their jobs and draining our
intelligence resources. We should especially remember this reported by AP yesterday:
The
Office of the Director of National Intelligence will dramatically
reduce its workforce and cut its budget by more than $700 million
annually, the Trump administration announced Wednesday.
Director
of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said in a statement, “Over the
last 20 years, ODNI has become bloated and inefficient, and the
intelligence community is rife with abuse of power, unauthorized leaks
of classified intelligence, and politicized weaponization of
intelligence.”
Again, an attack
on US soil could take place during Chump's administration -- especially
the way he antagonizes so many other countries. If it does, the first
points we all need to remember is that (a) unqualified people are
serving in security posts in this administration, (b) they have diverted
needed resources for their own comfort and (c) they've cut our
intelligence budget and our intelligence workforce. There is no excuse
for this. Second set of points should include that these three steps
are high crimes and misdemeanors and grounds to impeach Chump.
Let's wind down with this from Senator Alex Padilla's office:
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, U.S. Senator Alex Padilla
(D-Calif.), Ranking Member of the Senate Rules and Administration
Committee and California’s former Secretary of State, issued the
following statement after President Trump attacked mail-in voting and
America’s election systems:
“Donald Trump is now taking advice on voter suppression from a
murderous dictator who rigs elections, jails political opponents, and
persecutes dissent. Trump knows the MAGA agenda is unpopular: raising
your grocery prices and hiking up your health care premiums, all while
handing out tax breaks to billionaires. So he’s resorting to desperate
schemes to cling to power.
“Even his preferred news outlets, Newsmax and Fox News, have
been forced to answer for pushing conspiracies about voting machines.
They admitted what Trump won’t — he lost the 2020 election, and mail-in
voting is secure. Fortunately, Trump doesn’t have the power to
unilaterally end mail-in voting. But Congress must stand up for free and
fair elections as he continues his assault on our democracy.”